bjoernager/rust
bjoernager/rust
1
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Activity

Auto merge of #134794 - RalfJung:abi-required-target-features, r=workingjubilee

Browse source 
Add a notion of "some ABIs require certain target features"

I think I finally found the right shape for the data and checks that I recently added in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/133099, https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/133417, https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/134337: we have a notion of "this ABI requires the following list of target features, and it is incompatible with the following list of target features". Both `-Ctarget-feature` and `#[target_feature]` are updated to ensure we follow the rules of the ABI.  This removes all the "toggleability" stuff introduced before, though we do keep the notion of a fully "forbidden" target feature -- this is needed to deal with target features that are actual ABI switches, and hence are needed to even compute the list of required target features.

We always explicitly (un)set all required and in-conflict features, just to avoid potential trouble caused by the default features of whatever the base CPU is. We do this *before* applying `-Ctarget-feature` to maintain backward compatibility; this poses a slight risk of missing some implicit feature dependencies in LLVM but has the advantage of not breaking users that deliberately toggle ABI-relevant target features. They get a warning but the feature does get toggled the way they requested.

For now, our logic supports x86, ARM, and RISC-V (just like the previous logic did). Unsurprisingly, RISC-V is the nicest. ;)

As a side-effect this also (unstably) allows *enabling* `x87` when that is harmless. I used the opportunity to mark SSE2 as required on x86-64, to better match the actual logic in LLVM and because all x86-64 chips do have SSE2. This infrastructure also prepares us for requiring SSE on x86-32 when we want to use that for our ABI (and for float semantics sanity), see https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/133611, but no such change is happening in this PR.

r? `@workingjubilee`
This commit is contained in:
bors 2025-01-05 23:21:06 +00:00
commit feb32c6546
25 changed files with 837 additions and 793 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

1
compiler/rustc_codegen_gcc/src/errors.rs
View file

@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ pub(crate) struct UnstableCTargetFeature<'a> {
#[diag(codegen_gcc_forbidden_ctarget_feature)]
pub(crate) struct ForbiddenCTargetFeature<'a> {
pub feature: &'a str,
pub enabled: &'a str,
pub reason: &'a str,
}

207
compiler/rustc_codegen_gcc/src/gcc_util.rs
View file

@ -1,9 +1,11 @@
use std::iter::FromIterator;
#[cfg(feature = "master")]
use gccjit::Context;
use rustc_codegen_ssa::codegen_attrs::check_tied_features;
use rustc_codegen_ssa::errors::TargetFeatureDisableOrEnable;
use rustc_data_structures::fx::FxHashMap;
use rustc_middle::bug;
use rustc_data_structures::fx::{FxHashMap, FxHashSet};
use rustc_data_structures::unord::UnordSet;
use rustc_session::Session;
use rustc_target::target_features::RUSTC_SPECIFIC_FEATURES;
use smallvec::{SmallVec, smallvec};
@ -37,82 +39,137 @@ pub(crate) fn global_gcc_features(sess: &Session, diagnostics: bool) -> Vec<Stri
let mut features = vec![];
// Features implied by an implicit or explicit `--target`.
features.extend(
sess.target
.features
.split(',')
.filter(|v| !v.is_empty() && backend_feature_name(v).is_some())
.map(String::from),
);
features.extend(sess.target.features.split(',').filter(|v| !v.is_empty()).map(String::from));
// -Ctarget-features
let known_features = sess.target.rust_target_features();
let mut featsmap = FxHashMap::default();
let feats = sess
.opts
.cg
.target_feature
.split(',')
.filter_map(|s| {
let enable_disable = match s.chars().next() {
None => return None,
Some(c @ ('+' | '-')) => c,
Some(_) => {
if diagnostics {
sess.dcx().emit_warn(UnknownCTargetFeaturePrefix { feature: s });
}
return None;
}
};
// Get the backend feature name, if any.
// This excludes rustc-specific features, that do not get passed down to GCC.
let feature = backend_feature_name(s)?;
// Warn against use of GCC specific feature names on the CLI.
// Ensure that all ABI-required features are enabled, and the ABI-forbidden ones
// are disabled.
let abi_feature_constraints = sess.target.abi_required_features();
let abi_incompatible_set =
FxHashSet::from_iter(abi_feature_constraints.incompatible.iter().copied());
// Compute implied features
let mut all_rust_features = vec![];
for feature in sess.opts.cg.target_feature.split(',') {
if let Some(feature) = feature.strip_prefix('+') {
all_rust_features.extend(
UnordSet::from(sess.target.implied_target_features(std::iter::once(feature)))
.to_sorted_stable_ord()
.iter()
.map(|&&s| (true, s)),
)
} else if let Some(feature) = feature.strip_prefix('-') {
// FIXME: Why do we not remove implied features on "-" here?
// We do the equivalent above in `target_features_cfg`.
// See <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/134792>.
all_rust_features.push((false, feature));
} else if !feature.is_empty() {
if diagnostics {
let feature_state = known_features.iter().find(|&&(v, _, _)| v == feature);
match feature_state {
None => {
let rust_feature =
known_features.iter().find_map(|&(rust_feature, _, _)| {
let gcc_features = to_gcc_features(sess, rust_feature);
if gcc_features.contains(&feature)
&& !gcc_features.contains(&rust_feature)
{
Some(rust_feature)
} else {
None
}
});
let unknown_feature = if let Some(rust_feature) = rust_feature {
UnknownCTargetFeature {
feature,
rust_feature: PossibleFeature::Some { rust_feature },
}
} else {
UnknownCTargetFeature { feature, rust_feature: PossibleFeature::None }
};
sess.dcx().emit_warn(unknown_feature);
}
Some((_, stability, _)) => {
if let Err(reason) =
stability.toggle_allowed(&sess.target, enable_disable == '+')
sess.dcx().emit_warn(UnknownCTargetFeaturePrefix { feature });
}
}
}
// Remove features that are meant for rustc, not codegen.
all_rust_features.retain(|(_, feature)| {
// Retain if it is not a rustc feature
!RUSTC_SPECIFIC_FEATURES.contains(feature)
});
// Check feature validity.
if diagnostics {
for &(enable, feature) in &all_rust_features {
let feature_state = known_features.iter().find(|&&(v, _, _)| v == feature);
match feature_state {
None => {
let rust_feature = known_features.iter().find_map(|&(rust_feature, _, _)| {
let gcc_features = to_gcc_features(sess, rust_feature);
if gcc_features.contains(&feature) && !gcc_features.contains(&rust_feature)
{
sess.dcx().emit_warn(ForbiddenCTargetFeature { feature, reason });
} else if stability.requires_nightly().is_some() {
// An unstable feature. Warn about using it. (It makes little sense
// to hard-error here since we just warn about fully unknown
// features above).
sess.dcx().emit_warn(UnstableCTargetFeature { feature });
Some(rust_feature)
} else {
None
}
});
let unknown_feature = if let Some(rust_feature) = rust_feature {
UnknownCTargetFeature {
feature,
rust_feature: PossibleFeature::Some { rust_feature },
}
} else {
UnknownCTargetFeature { feature, rust_feature: PossibleFeature::None }
};
sess.dcx().emit_warn(unknown_feature);
}
Some((_, stability, _)) => {
if let Err(reason) = stability.toggle_allowed() {
sess.dcx().emit_warn(ForbiddenCTargetFeature {
feature,
enabled: if enable { "enabled" } else { "disabled" },
reason,
});
} else if stability.requires_nightly().is_some() {
// An unstable feature. Warn about using it. (It makes little sense
// to hard-error here since we just warn about fully unknown
// features above).
sess.dcx().emit_warn(UnstableCTargetFeature { feature });
}
}
// FIXME(nagisa): figure out how to not allocate a full hashset here.
featsmap.insert(feature, enable_disable == '+');
}
// ... otherwise though we run through `to_gcc_features` when
// Ensure that the features we enable/disable are compatible with the ABI.
if enable {
if abi_incompatible_set.contains(feature) {
sess.dcx().emit_warn(ForbiddenCTargetFeature {
feature,
enabled: "enabled",
reason: "this feature is incompatible with the target ABI",
});
}
} else {
// FIXME: we have to request implied features here since
// negative features do not handle implied features above.
for &required in abi_feature_constraints.required.iter() {
let implied = sess.target.implied_target_features(std::iter::once(required));
if implied.contains(feature) {
sess.dcx().emit_warn(ForbiddenCTargetFeature {
feature,
enabled: "disabled",
reason: "this feature is required by the target ABI",
});
}
}
}
// FIXME(nagisa): figure out how to not allocate a full hashset here.
featsmap.insert(feature, enable);
}
}
// To be sure the ABI-relevant features are all in the right state, we explicitly
// (un)set them here. This means if the target spec sets those features wrong,
// we will silently correct them rather than silently producing wrong code.
// (The target sanity check tries to catch this, but we can't know which features are
// enabled in GCC by default so we can't be fully sure about that check.)
// We add these at the beginning of the list so that `-Ctarget-features` can
// still override it... that's unsound, but more compatible with past behavior.
all_rust_features.splice(
0..0,
abi_feature_constraints
.required
.iter()
.map(|&f| (true, f))
.chain(abi_feature_constraints.incompatible.iter().map(|&f| (false, f))),
);
// Translate this into GCC features.
let feats = all_rust_features
.iter()
.filter_map(|&(enable, feature)| {
let enable_disable = if enable { '+' } else { '-' };
// We run through `to_gcc_features` when
// passing requests down to GCC. This means that all in-language
// features also work on the command line instead of having two
// different names when the GCC name and the Rust name differ.
@ -146,26 +203,12 @@ pub(crate) fn global_gcc_features(sess: &Session, diagnostics: bool) -> Vec<Stri
features
}
/// Returns a feature name for the given `+feature` or `-feature` string.
///
/// Only allows features that are backend specific (i.e. not [`RUSTC_SPECIFIC_FEATURES`].)
fn backend_feature_name(s: &str) -> Option<&str> {
// features must start with a `+` or `-`.
let feature = s.strip_prefix(&['+', '-'][..]).unwrap_or_else(|| {
bug!("target feature `{}` must begin with a `+` or `-`", s);
});
// Rustc-specific feature requests like `+crt-static` or `-crt-static`
// are not passed down to GCC.
if RUSTC_SPECIFIC_FEATURES.contains(&feature) {
return None;
}
Some(feature)
}
// To find a list of GCC's names, check https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Function-Attributes.html
pub fn to_gcc_features<'a>(sess: &Session, s: &'a str) -> SmallVec<[&'a str; 2]> {
let arch = if sess.target.arch == "x86_64" { "x86" } else { &*sess.target.arch };
match (arch, s) {
// FIXME: seems like x87 does not exist?
("x86", "x87") => smallvec![],
("x86", "sse4.2") => smallvec!["sse4.2", "crc32"],
("x86", "pclmulqdq") => smallvec!["pclmul"],
("x86", "rdrand") => smallvec!["rdrnd"],