bjoernager/rust
bjoernager/rust
1
Fork 0
Code Activity

move lint documentation into macro invocations

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Andy Russell 2019-03-05 11:50:33 -05:00
parent a8f61e70a8
commit fe96ffeac9
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: BE2221033EDBC374
132 changed files with 5405 additions and 5390 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

128
clippy_lints/src/literal_representation.rs
View file

@ -9,95 +9,95 @@ use rustc_errors::Applicability;
use syntax::ast::*;
use syntax_pos;
/// **What it does:** Warns if a long integral or floating-point constant does
/// not contain underscores.
///
/// **Why is this bad?** Reading long numbers is difficult without separators.
///
/// **Known problems:** None.
///
/// **Example:**
///
/// ```rust
/// 61864918973511
/// ```
declare_clippy_lint! {
/// **What it does:** Warns if a long integral or floating-point constant does
/// not contain underscores.
///
/// **Why is this bad?** Reading long numbers is difficult without separators.
///
/// **Known problems:** None.
///
/// **Example:**
///
/// ```rust
/// 61864918973511
/// ```
pub UNREADABLE_LITERAL,
style,
"long integer literal without underscores"
}
/// **What it does:** Warns for mistyped suffix in literals
///
/// **Why is this bad?** This is most probably a typo
///
/// **Known problems:**
/// - Recommends a signed suffix, even though the number might be too big and an unsigned
/// suffix is required
/// - Does not match on `_128` since that is a valid grouping for decimal and octal numbers
///
/// **Example:**
///
/// ```rust
/// 2_32
/// ```
declare_clippy_lint! {
/// **What it does:** Warns for mistyped suffix in literals
///
/// **Why is this bad?** This is most probably a typo
///
/// **Known problems:**
/// - Recommends a signed suffix, even though the number might be too big and an unsigned
/// suffix is required
/// - Does not match on `_128` since that is a valid grouping for decimal and octal numbers
///
/// **Example:**
///
/// ```rust
/// 2_32
/// ```
pub MISTYPED_LITERAL_SUFFIXES,
correctness,
"mistyped literal suffix"
}
/// **What it does:** Warns if an integral or floating-point constant is
/// grouped inconsistently with underscores.
///
/// **Why is this bad?** Readers may incorrectly interpret inconsistently
/// grouped digits.
///
/// **Known problems:** None.
///
/// **Example:**
///
/// ```rust
/// 618_64_9189_73_511
/// ```
declare_clippy_lint! {
/// **What it does:** Warns if an integral or floating-point constant is
/// grouped inconsistently with underscores.
///
/// **Why is this bad?** Readers may incorrectly interpret inconsistently
/// grouped digits.
///
/// **Known problems:** None.
///
/// **Example:**
///
/// ```rust
/// 618_64_9189_73_511
/// ```
pub INCONSISTENT_DIGIT_GROUPING,
style,
"integer literals with digits grouped inconsistently"
}
/// **What it does:** Warns if the digits of an integral or floating-point
/// constant are grouped into groups that
/// are too large.
///
/// **Why is this bad?** Negatively impacts readability.
///
/// **Known problems:** None.
///
/// **Example:**
///
/// ```rust
/// 6186491_8973511
/// ```
declare_clippy_lint! {
/// **What it does:** Warns if the digits of an integral or floating-point
/// constant are grouped into groups that
/// are too large.
///
/// **Why is this bad?** Negatively impacts readability.
///
/// **Known problems:** None.
///
/// **Example:**
///
/// ```rust
/// 6186491_8973511
/// ```
pub LARGE_DIGIT_GROUPS,
pedantic,
"grouping digits into groups that are too large"
}
/// **What it does:** Warns if there is a better representation for a numeric literal.
///
/// **Why is this bad?** Especially for big powers of 2 a hexadecimal representation is more
/// readable than a decimal representation.
///
/// **Known problems:** None.
///
/// **Example:**
///
/// `255` => `0xFF`
/// `65_535` => `0xFFFF`
/// `4_042_322_160` => `0xF0F0_F0F0`
declare_clippy_lint! {
/// **What it does:** Warns if there is a better representation for a numeric literal.
///
/// **Why is this bad?** Especially for big powers of 2 a hexadecimal representation is more
/// readable than a decimal representation.
///
/// **Known problems:** None.
///
/// **Example:**
///
/// `255` => `0xFF`
/// `65_535` => `0xFFFF`
/// `4_042_322_160` => `0xF0F0_F0F0`
pub DECIMAL_LITERAL_REPRESENTATION,
restriction,
"using decimal representation when hexadecimal would be better"