don't ignore sign for ABI check
This commit is contained in:
parent
3e66914fc8
commit
fd92d956c8
1 changed files with 1 additions and 7 deletions
|
@ -1,7 +1,5 @@
|
|||
#![feature(portable_simd)]
|
||||
use std::mem;
|
||||
use std::num;
|
||||
use std::simd;
|
||||
|
||||
#[derive(Copy, Clone)]
|
||||
struct Zst;
|
||||
|
@ -56,8 +54,7 @@ fn test_abi_newtype<T: Copy>(t: T) {
|
|||
|
||||
fn main() {
|
||||
// Here we check:
|
||||
// - unsigned vs signed integer is allowed
|
||||
// - u32/i32 vs char is allowed
|
||||
// - u32 vs char is allowed
|
||||
// - u32 vs NonZeroU32/Option<NonZeroU32> is allowed
|
||||
// - reference vs raw pointer is allowed
|
||||
// - references to things of the same size and alignment are allowed
|
||||
|
@ -65,10 +62,7 @@ fn main() {
|
|||
// these would be stably guaranteed. Code that relies on this is equivalent to code that relies
|
||||
// on the layout of `repr(Rust)` types. They are also fragile: the same mismatches in the fields
|
||||
// of a struct (even with `repr(C)`) will not always be accepted by Miri.
|
||||
test_abi_compat(0u32, 0i32);
|
||||
test_abi_compat(simd::u32x8::splat(1), simd::i32x8::splat(1));
|
||||
test_abi_compat(0u32, 'x');
|
||||
test_abi_compat(0i32, 'x');
|
||||
test_abi_compat(42u32, num::NonZeroU32::new(1).unwrap());
|
||||
test_abi_compat(0u32, Some(num::NonZeroU32::new(1).unwrap()));
|
||||
test_abi_compat(&0u32, &0u32 as *const u32);
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue