bjoernager/rust
bjoernager/rust
1
Fork 0
Code Activity

Fix inaccurate function name in rustc_const_eval docs

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
pierwill 2022-03-24 13:37:18 -05:00
parent e209e85e39
commit f1f0734718
2 changed files with 3 additions and 3 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

4
compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/interpret/operand.rs
View file

@ -520,8 +520,8 @@ impl<'mir, 'tcx: 'mir, M: Machine<'mir, 'tcx>> InterpCx<'mir, 'tcx, M> {
Ok(OpTy { op, layout: place.layout }) Ok(OpTy { op, layout: place.layout })
} }
// Evaluate a place with the goal of reading from it. This lets us sometimes /// Evaluate a place with the goal of reading from it. This lets us sometimes
// avoid allocations. /// avoid allocations.
pub fn eval_place_to_op( pub fn eval_place_to_op(
&self, &self,
place: mir::Place<'tcx>, place: mir::Place<'tcx>,

2
compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/interpret/place.rs
View file

@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ where
} }
/// Computes a place. You should only use this if you intend to write into this /// Computes a place. You should only use this if you intend to write into this
/// place; for reading, a more efficient alternative is `eval_place_for_read`. /// place; for reading, a more efficient alternative is `eval_place_to_op`.
#[instrument(skip(self), level = "debug")] #[instrument(skip(self), level = "debug")]
pub fn eval_place( pub fn eval_place(
&mut self, &mut self,