Rollup merge of #138639 - spencer3035:clean-ui-tests-2-of-n, r=jieyouxu
Clean UI tests 2 of n Modified 4 tests in tests/ui. Cleaned 3 and deleted one. I have a final commit changing the values in `src/tools/tidy/src/ui_tests.rs`. I wasn't sure if it was best practice to change this value as you go along or once at the end. I can rebase to something that incrementally changes the value in the "cleaned" commits if that is preferred. Related Issues: #73494 #133895 r? jieyouxu
This commit is contained in:
commit
f01d0960e9
8 changed files with 65 additions and 78 deletions
|
@ -2000,7 +2000,6 @@ ui/issues/issue-28586.rs
|
|||
ui/issues/issue-28600.rs
|
||||
ui/issues/issue-28625.rs
|
||||
ui/issues/issue-28776.rs
|
||||
ui/issues/issue-28777.rs
|
||||
ui/issues/issue-28828.rs
|
||||
ui/issues/issue-28839.rs
|
||||
ui/issues/issue-28936.rs
|
||||
|
@ -2063,7 +2062,6 @@ ui/issues/issue-3091.rs
|
|||
ui/issues/issue-31011.rs
|
||||
ui/issues/issue-3109.rs
|
||||
ui/issues/issue-3121.rs
|
||||
ui/issues/issue-31260.rs
|
||||
ui/issues/issue-31267-additional.rs
|
||||
ui/issues/issue-31267.rs
|
||||
ui/issues/issue-31299.rs
|
||||
|
@ -2608,7 +2606,6 @@ ui/issues/issue-9243.rs
|
|||
ui/issues/issue-9249.rs
|
||||
ui/issues/issue-9259.rs
|
||||
ui/issues/issue-92741.rs
|
||||
ui/issues/issue-9382.rs
|
||||
ui/issues/issue-9446.rs
|
||||
ui/issues/issue-9719.rs
|
||||
ui/issues/issue-9725.rs
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ use ignore::Walk;
|
|||
const ENTRY_LIMIT: u32 = 901;
|
||||
// FIXME: The following limits should be reduced eventually.
|
||||
|
||||
const ISSUES_ENTRY_LIMIT: u32 = 1634;
|
||||
const ISSUES_ENTRY_LIMIT: u32 = 1631;
|
||||
|
||||
const EXPECTED_TEST_FILE_EXTENSIONS: &[&str] = &[
|
||||
"rs", // test source files
|
||||
|
|
20
tests/ui/coercion/struct-coerce-vec-to-slice.rs
Normal file
20
tests/ui/coercion/struct-coerce-vec-to-slice.rs
Normal file
|
@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
|
|||
//! Regression test that ensures struct field literals can be coerced into slice and `Box` types
|
||||
|
||||
//@ check-pass
|
||||
|
||||
struct Thing1<'a> {
|
||||
baz: &'a [Box<isize>],
|
||||
bar: Box<u64>,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
struct Thing2<'a> {
|
||||
baz: &'a [Box<isize>],
|
||||
bar: u64,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pub fn main() {
|
||||
let _a = Thing1 { baz: &[], bar: Box::new(32) };
|
||||
let _b = Thing1 { baz: &Vec::new(), bar: Box::new(32) };
|
||||
let _c = Thing2 { baz: &[], bar: 32 };
|
||||
let _d = Thing2 { baz: &Vec::new(), bar: 32 };
|
||||
}
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
|
|||
//! Regression test to check that literal expressions in a struct field can be coerced to the
|
||||
//! expected field type, including block expressions.
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! Issue: <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/31260>
|
||||
|
||||
//@ check-pass
|
||||
|
||||
pub struct Struct<K: 'static> {
|
||||
pub field: K,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static STRUCT: Struct<&'static [u8]> = Struct { field: { &[1] } };
|
||||
|
||||
static STRUCT2: Struct<&'static [u8]> = Struct { field: &[1] };
|
||||
|
||||
fn main() {}
|
|
@ -1,22 +0,0 @@
|
|||
//@ run-pass
|
||||
#![allow(unused_braces)]
|
||||
fn main() {
|
||||
let v1 = { 1 + {2} * {3} };
|
||||
let v2 = 1 + {2} * {3} ;
|
||||
|
||||
assert_eq!(7, v1);
|
||||
assert_eq!(7, v2);
|
||||
|
||||
let v3;
|
||||
v3 = { 1 + {2} * {3} };
|
||||
let v4;
|
||||
v4 = 1 + {2} * {3};
|
||||
assert_eq!(7, v3);
|
||||
assert_eq!(7, v4);
|
||||
|
||||
let v5 = { 1 + {2} * 3 };
|
||||
assert_eq!(7, v5);
|
||||
|
||||
let v9 = { 1 + if 1 > 2 {1} else {2} * {3} };
|
||||
assert_eq!(7, v9);
|
||||
}
|
|
@ -1,15 +0,0 @@
|
|||
//@ check-pass
|
||||
#![allow(dead_code)]
|
||||
pub struct Struct<K: 'static> {
|
||||
pub field: K,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static STRUCT: Struct<&'static [u8]> = Struct {
|
||||
field: {&[1]}
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
static STRUCT2: Struct<&'static [u8]> = Struct {
|
||||
field: &[1]
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
fn main() {}
|
|
@ -1,37 +0,0 @@
|
|||
//@ run-pass
|
||||
#![allow(dead_code)]
|
||||
|
||||
// Tests for a previous bug that occurred due to an interaction
|
||||
// between struct field initialization and the auto-coercion
|
||||
// from a vector to a slice. The drop glue was being invoked on
|
||||
// the temporary slice with a wrong type, triggering an LLVM assert.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
struct Thing1<'a> {
|
||||
baz: &'a [Box<isize>],
|
||||
bar: Box<u64>,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
struct Thing2<'a> {
|
||||
baz: &'a [Box<isize>],
|
||||
bar: u64,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pub fn main() {
|
||||
let _t1_fixed = Thing1 {
|
||||
baz: &[],
|
||||
bar: Box::new(32),
|
||||
};
|
||||
Thing1 {
|
||||
baz: &Vec::new(),
|
||||
bar: Box::new(32),
|
||||
};
|
||||
let _t2_fixed = Thing2 {
|
||||
baz: &[],
|
||||
bar: 32,
|
||||
};
|
||||
Thing2 {
|
||||
baz: &Vec::new(),
|
||||
bar: 32,
|
||||
};
|
||||
}
|
28
tests/ui/parser/operator-precedence-braces-exprs.rs
Normal file
28
tests/ui/parser/operator-precedence-braces-exprs.rs
Normal file
|
@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
|
|||
//! Regression test for ensuring that operator precedence is correctly handled in the presence of
|
||||
//! braces
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! Issue: <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/28777>
|
||||
|
||||
//@ run-pass
|
||||
|
||||
#[allow(unused_braces)]
|
||||
fn main() {
|
||||
let v1 = { 1 + { 2 } * { 3 } };
|
||||
let v2 = 1 + { 2 } * { 3 };
|
||||
|
||||
assert_eq!(7, v1);
|
||||
assert_eq!(7, v2);
|
||||
|
||||
let v3;
|
||||
v3 = { 1 + { 2 } * { 3 } };
|
||||
let v4;
|
||||
v4 = 1 + { 2 } * { 3 };
|
||||
assert_eq!(7, v3);
|
||||
assert_eq!(7, v4);
|
||||
|
||||
let v5 = { 1 + { 2 } * 3 };
|
||||
assert_eq!(7, v5);
|
||||
|
||||
let v9 = { 1 + if 1 > 2 { 1 } else { 2 } * { 3 } };
|
||||
assert_eq!(7, v9);
|
||||
}
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue