bjoernager/rust
bjoernager/rust
1
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Activity

replace usage of evaluate_goal with a new add_goal

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Boxy 2023-03-16 14:58:26 +00:00
parent 7ac4b82ddd
commit ed63201224
8 changed files with 334 additions and 252 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

45
compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/solve/assembly.rs
View file

@ -224,7 +224,9 @@ impl<'tcx> EvalCtxt<'_, 'tcx> {
if goal.predicate.self_ty().is_ty_var() {
return vec![Candidate {
source: CandidateSource::BuiltinImpl,
result: self.make_canonical_response(Certainty::AMBIGUOUS).unwrap(),
result: self
.evaluate_added_goals_and_make_canonical_response(Certainty::AMBIGUOUS)
.unwrap(),
}];
}
@ -261,8 +263,9 @@ impl<'tcx> EvalCtxt<'_, 'tcx> {
let &ty::Alias(ty::Projection, projection_ty) = goal.predicate.self_ty().kind() else {
return
};
self.probe(|this| {
let normalized_ty = this.next_ty_infer();
self.probe(|ecx| {
let normalized_ty = ecx.next_ty_infer();
let normalizes_to_goal = goal.with(
tcx,
ty::Binder::dummy(ty::ProjectionPredicate {
@ -270,28 +273,16 @@ impl<'tcx> EvalCtxt<'_, 'tcx> {
term: normalized_ty.into(),
}),
);
let normalization_certainty = match this.evaluate_goal(normalizes_to_goal) {
Ok((_, certainty)) => certainty,
Err(NoSolution) => return,
};
let normalized_ty = this.resolve_vars_if_possible(normalized_ty);
ecx.add_goal(normalizes_to_goal);
if let Ok(_) = ecx.try_evaluate_added_goals() {
let normalized_ty = ecx.resolve_vars_if_possible(normalized_ty);
// NOTE: Alternatively we could call `evaluate_goal` here and only have a `Normalized` candidate.
// This doesn't work as long as we use `CandidateSource` in winnowing.
let goal = goal.with(tcx, goal.predicate.with_self_ty(tcx, normalized_ty));
let normalized_candidates = this.assemble_and_evaluate_candidates(goal);
for mut normalized_candidate in normalized_candidates {
normalized_candidate.result =
normalized_candidate.result.unchecked_map(|mut response| {
// FIXME: This currently hides overflow in the normalization step of the self type
// which is probably wrong. Maybe `unify_and` should actually keep overflow as
// we treat it as non-fatal anyways.
response.certainty = response.certainty.unify_and(normalization_certainty);
response
});
candidates.push(normalized_candidate);
// NOTE: Alternatively we could call `evaluate_goal` here and only have a `Normalized` candidate.
// This doesn't work as long as we use `CandidateSource` in winnowing.
let goal = goal.with(tcx, goal.predicate.with_self_ty(tcx, normalized_ty));
candidates.extend(ecx.assemble_and_evaluate_candidates(goal));
}
})
});
}
fn assemble_impl_candidates<G: GoalKind<'tcx>>(
@ -516,7 +507,7 @@ impl<'tcx> EvalCtxt<'_, 'tcx> {
} else {
Certainty::AMBIGUOUS
};
return self.make_canonical_response(certainty);
return self.evaluate_added_goals_and_make_canonical_response(certainty);
}
}
@ -538,14 +529,16 @@ impl<'tcx> EvalCtxt<'_, 'tcx> {
}
}
fn discard_reservation_impl(&self, mut candidate: Candidate<'tcx>) -> Candidate<'tcx> {
fn discard_reservation_impl(&mut self, mut candidate: Candidate<'tcx>) -> Candidate<'tcx> {
if let CandidateSource::Impl(def_id) = candidate.source {
if let ty::ImplPolarity::Reservation = self.tcx().impl_polarity(def_id) {
debug!("Selected reservation impl");
// We assemble all candidates inside of a probe so by
// making a new canonical response here our result will
// have no constraints.
candidate.result = self.make_canonical_response(Certainty::AMBIGUOUS).unwrap();
candidate.result = self
.evaluate_added_goals_and_make_canonical_response(Certainty::AMBIGUOUS)
.unwrap();
}
}