MCP636: Add simpler and more explicit syntax to check-cfg

This add a new form and deprecated the other ones:
 - cfg(name1, ..., nameN, values("value1", "value2", ... "valueN"))
 - cfg(name1, ..., nameN) or cfg(name1, ..., nameN, values())
 - cfg(any())

It also changes the default exhaustiveness to be enable-by-default in
the presence of any --check-cfg arguments.
This commit is contained in:
Urgau 2023-05-01 14:17:56 +02:00
parent a4a10bdf29
commit e5e95eba45
4 changed files with 311 additions and 135 deletions

View file

@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
#![feature(internal_output_capture)]
#![feature(thread_spawn_unchecked)]
#![feature(lazy_cell)]
#![feature(let_chains)]
#![feature(try_blocks)]
#![recursion_limit = "256"]
#![allow(rustc::potential_query_instability)]