bjoernager/rust
bjoernager/rust
1
Fork 0
Code Activity

refactor(rustc_middle): Substs -> GenericArg

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Mahdi Dibaiee 2023-07-11 22:35:29 +01:00
parent df5c2cf9bc
commit e55583c4b8
466 changed files with 4574 additions and 4604 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

6
compiler/rustc_codegen_gcc/src/callee.rs
View file

@ -17,8 +17,8 @@ use crate::context::CodegenCx;
pub fn get_fn<'gcc, 'tcx>(cx: &CodegenCx<'gcc, 'tcx>, instance: Instance<'tcx>) -> Function<'gcc> {
let tcx = cx.tcx();
assert!(!instance.substs.has_infer());
assert!(!instance.substs.has_escaping_bound_vars());
assert!(!instance.args.has_infer());
assert!(!instance.args.has_escaping_bound_vars());
let sym = tcx.symbol_name(instance).name;
@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ pub fn get_fn<'gcc, 'tcx>(cx: &CodegenCx<'gcc, 'tcx>, instance: Instance<'tcx>)
// whether we are sharing generics or not. The important thing here is
// that the visibility we apply to the declaration is the same one that
// has been applied to the definition (wherever that definition may be).
let is_generic = instance.substs.non_erasable_generics().next().is_some();
let is_generic = instance.args.non_erasable_generics().next().is_some();
if is_generic {
// This is a monomorphization. Its expected visibility depends