Rollup merge of #124418 - compiler-errors:better-cause, r=lcnr
Use a proof tree visitor to refine the `Obligation` for error reporting in new solver With the magic of `ProofTreeVisitor`, we can close the gap that we have on `ObligationCause`s being not as descriptive in the new trait solver. r? lcnr Needs some work and obviously documentation.
This commit is contained in:
commit
e3bf0a13cf
39 changed files with 474 additions and 102 deletions
|
@ -58,15 +58,15 @@ pub(super) trait GoalKind<'tcx>:
|
|||
/// goal by equating it with the assumption.
|
||||
fn probe_and_consider_implied_clause(
|
||||
ecx: &mut EvalCtxt<'_, 'tcx>,
|
||||
source: CandidateSource,
|
||||
parent_source: CandidateSource,
|
||||
goal: Goal<'tcx, Self>,
|
||||
assumption: ty::Clause<'tcx>,
|
||||
requirements: impl IntoIterator<Item = Goal<'tcx, ty::Predicate<'tcx>>>,
|
||||
requirements: impl IntoIterator<Item = (GoalSource, Goal<'tcx, ty::Predicate<'tcx>>)>,
|
||||
) -> Result<Candidate<'tcx>, NoSolution> {
|
||||
Self::probe_and_match_goal_against_assumption(ecx, source, goal, assumption, |ecx| {
|
||||
// FIXME(-Znext-solver=coinductive): check whether this should be
|
||||
// `GoalSource::ImplWhereBound` for any caller.
|
||||
ecx.add_goals(GoalSource::Misc, requirements);
|
||||
Self::probe_and_match_goal_against_assumption(ecx, parent_source, goal, assumption, |ecx| {
|
||||
for (nested_source, goal) in requirements {
|
||||
ecx.add_goal(nested_source, goal);
|
||||
}
|
||||
ecx.evaluate_added_goals_and_make_canonical_response(Certainty::Yes)
|
||||
})
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -85,9 +85,8 @@ pub(super) trait GoalKind<'tcx>:
|
|||
let ty::Dynamic(bounds, _, _) = *goal.predicate.self_ty().kind() else {
|
||||
bug!("expected object type in `probe_and_consider_object_bound_candidate`");
|
||||
};
|
||||
// FIXME(-Znext-solver=coinductive): Should this be `GoalSource::ImplWhereBound`?
|
||||
ecx.add_goals(
|
||||
GoalSource::Misc,
|
||||
GoalSource::ImplWhereBound,
|
||||
structural_traits::predicates_for_object_candidate(
|
||||
ecx,
|
||||
goal.param_env,
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -90,6 +90,8 @@ impl<'tcx> EvalCtxt<'_, 'tcx> {
|
|||
&mut self,
|
||||
certainty: Certainty,
|
||||
) -> QueryResult<'tcx> {
|
||||
self.inspect.make_canonical_response(certainty);
|
||||
|
||||
let goals_certainty = self.try_evaluate_added_goals()?;
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
self.tainted,
|
||||
|
@ -98,8 +100,6 @@ impl<'tcx> EvalCtxt<'_, 'tcx> {
|
|||
previous call to `try_evaluate_added_goals!`"
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
self.inspect.make_canonical_response(certainty);
|
||||
|
||||
// When normalizing, we've replaced the expected term with an unconstrained
|
||||
// inference variable. This means that we dropped information which could
|
||||
// have been important. We handle this by instead returning the nested goals
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -454,7 +454,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> EvalCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
|
|||
} else {
|
||||
self.infcx.enter_forall(kind, |kind| {
|
||||
let goal = goal.with(self.tcx(), ty::Binder::dummy(kind));
|
||||
self.add_goal(GoalSource::Misc, goal);
|
||||
self.add_goal(GoalSource::InstantiateHigherRanked, goal);
|
||||
self.evaluate_added_goals_and_make_canonical_response(Certainty::Yes)
|
||||
})
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -1,15 +1,19 @@
|
|||
use std::mem;
|
||||
use std::ops::ControlFlow;
|
||||
|
||||
use rustc_infer::infer::InferCtxt;
|
||||
use rustc_infer::traits::solve::MaybeCause;
|
||||
use rustc_infer::traits::query::NoSolution;
|
||||
use rustc_infer::traits::solve::inspect::ProbeKind;
|
||||
use rustc_infer::traits::solve::{CandidateSource, GoalSource, MaybeCause};
|
||||
use rustc_infer::traits::{
|
||||
query::NoSolution, FulfillmentError, FulfillmentErrorCode, MismatchedProjectionTypes,
|
||||
PredicateObligation, SelectionError, TraitEngine,
|
||||
self, FulfillmentError, FulfillmentErrorCode, MismatchedProjectionTypes, Obligation,
|
||||
ObligationCause, PredicateObligation, SelectionError, TraitEngine,
|
||||
};
|
||||
use rustc_middle::ty;
|
||||
use rustc_middle::ty::error::{ExpectedFound, TypeError};
|
||||
use rustc_middle::ty::{self, TyCtxt};
|
||||
|
||||
use super::eval_ctxt::GenerateProofTree;
|
||||
use super::inspect::{ProofTreeInferCtxtExt, ProofTreeVisitor};
|
||||
use super::{Certainty, InferCtxtEvalExt};
|
||||
|
||||
/// A trait engine using the new trait solver.
|
||||
|
@ -133,9 +137,9 @@ impl<'tcx> TraitEngine<'tcx> for FulfillmentCtxt<'tcx> {
|
|||
.collect();
|
||||
|
||||
errors.extend(self.obligations.overflowed.drain(..).map(|obligation| FulfillmentError {
|
||||
root_obligation: obligation.clone(),
|
||||
obligation: find_best_leaf_obligation(infcx, &obligation),
|
||||
code: FulfillmentErrorCode::Ambiguity { overflow: Some(true) },
|
||||
obligation,
|
||||
root_obligation: obligation,
|
||||
}));
|
||||
|
||||
errors
|
||||
|
@ -192,8 +196,10 @@ impl<'tcx> TraitEngine<'tcx> for FulfillmentCtxt<'tcx> {
|
|||
|
||||
fn fulfillment_error_for_no_solution<'tcx>(
|
||||
infcx: &InferCtxt<'tcx>,
|
||||
obligation: PredicateObligation<'tcx>,
|
||||
root_obligation: PredicateObligation<'tcx>,
|
||||
) -> FulfillmentError<'tcx> {
|
||||
let obligation = find_best_leaf_obligation(infcx, &root_obligation);
|
||||
|
||||
let code = match obligation.predicate.kind().skip_binder() {
|
||||
ty::PredicateKind::Clause(ty::ClauseKind::Projection(_)) => {
|
||||
FulfillmentErrorCode::ProjectionError(
|
||||
|
@ -234,7 +240,8 @@ fn fulfillment_error_for_no_solution<'tcx>(
|
|||
bug!("unexpected goal: {obligation:?}")
|
||||
}
|
||||
};
|
||||
FulfillmentError { root_obligation: obligation.clone(), code, obligation }
|
||||
|
||||
FulfillmentError { obligation, code, root_obligation }
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn fulfillment_error_for_stalled<'tcx>(
|
||||
|
@ -258,5 +265,136 @@ fn fulfillment_error_for_stalled<'tcx>(
|
|||
}
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
FulfillmentError { obligation: obligation.clone(), code, root_obligation: obligation }
|
||||
FulfillmentError {
|
||||
obligation: find_best_leaf_obligation(infcx, &obligation),
|
||||
code,
|
||||
root_obligation: obligation,
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn find_best_leaf_obligation<'tcx>(
|
||||
infcx: &InferCtxt<'tcx>,
|
||||
obligation: &PredicateObligation<'tcx>,
|
||||
) -> PredicateObligation<'tcx> {
|
||||
let obligation = infcx.resolve_vars_if_possible(obligation.clone());
|
||||
infcx
|
||||
.visit_proof_tree(
|
||||
obligation.clone().into(),
|
||||
&mut BestObligation { obligation: obligation.clone() },
|
||||
)
|
||||
.break_value()
|
||||
.unwrap_or(obligation)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
struct BestObligation<'tcx> {
|
||||
obligation: PredicateObligation<'tcx>,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl<'tcx> BestObligation<'tcx> {
|
||||
fn with_derived_obligation(
|
||||
&mut self,
|
||||
derived_obligation: PredicateObligation<'tcx>,
|
||||
and_then: impl FnOnce(&mut Self) -> <Self as ProofTreeVisitor<'tcx>>::Result,
|
||||
) -> <Self as ProofTreeVisitor<'tcx>>::Result {
|
||||
let old_obligation = std::mem::replace(&mut self.obligation, derived_obligation);
|
||||
let res = and_then(self);
|
||||
self.obligation = old_obligation;
|
||||
res
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl<'tcx> ProofTreeVisitor<'tcx> for BestObligation<'tcx> {
|
||||
type Result = ControlFlow<PredicateObligation<'tcx>>;
|
||||
|
||||
fn span(&self) -> rustc_span::Span {
|
||||
self.obligation.cause.span
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn visit_goal(&mut self, goal: &super::inspect::InspectGoal<'_, 'tcx>) -> Self::Result {
|
||||
// FIXME: Throw out candidates that have no failing WC and >0 failing misc goal.
|
||||
// This most likely means that the goal just didn't unify at all, e.g. a param
|
||||
// candidate with an alias in it.
|
||||
let candidates = goal.candidates();
|
||||
|
||||
let [candidate] = candidates.as_slice() else {
|
||||
return ControlFlow::Break(self.obligation.clone());
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
// FIXME: Could we extract a trait ref from a projection here too?
|
||||
// FIXME: Also, what about considering >1 layer up the stack? May be necessary
|
||||
// for normalizes-to.
|
||||
let Some(parent_trait_pred) = goal.goal().predicate.to_opt_poly_trait_pred() else {
|
||||
return ControlFlow::Break(self.obligation.clone());
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
let tcx = goal.infcx().tcx;
|
||||
let mut impl_where_bound_count = 0;
|
||||
for nested_goal in candidate.instantiate_nested_goals(self.span()) {
|
||||
let obligation;
|
||||
match nested_goal.source() {
|
||||
GoalSource::Misc => {
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
GoalSource::ImplWhereBound => {
|
||||
obligation = Obligation {
|
||||
cause: derive_cause(
|
||||
tcx,
|
||||
candidate.kind(),
|
||||
self.obligation.cause.clone(),
|
||||
impl_where_bound_count,
|
||||
parent_trait_pred,
|
||||
),
|
||||
param_env: nested_goal.goal().param_env,
|
||||
predicate: nested_goal.goal().predicate,
|
||||
recursion_depth: self.obligation.recursion_depth + 1,
|
||||
};
|
||||
impl_where_bound_count += 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
GoalSource::InstantiateHigherRanked => {
|
||||
obligation = self.obligation.clone();
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Skip nested goals that hold.
|
||||
//FIXME: We should change the max allowed certainty based on if we're
|
||||
// visiting an ambiguity or error obligation.
|
||||
if matches!(nested_goal.result(), Ok(Certainty::Yes)) {
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
self.with_derived_obligation(obligation, |this| nested_goal.visit_with(this))?;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
ControlFlow::Break(self.obligation.clone())
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn derive_cause<'tcx>(
|
||||
tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>,
|
||||
candidate_kind: ProbeKind<'tcx>,
|
||||
mut cause: ObligationCause<'tcx>,
|
||||
idx: usize,
|
||||
parent_trait_pred: ty::PolyTraitPredicate<'tcx>,
|
||||
) -> ObligationCause<'tcx> {
|
||||
match candidate_kind {
|
||||
ProbeKind::TraitCandidate { source: CandidateSource::Impl(impl_def_id), result: _ } => {
|
||||
if let Some((_, span)) =
|
||||
tcx.predicates_of(impl_def_id).instantiate_identity(tcx).iter().nth(idx)
|
||||
{
|
||||
cause = cause.derived_cause(parent_trait_pred, |derived| {
|
||||
traits::ImplDerivedObligation(Box::new(traits::ImplDerivedObligationCause {
|
||||
derived,
|
||||
impl_or_alias_def_id: impl_def_id,
|
||||
impl_def_predicate_index: Some(idx),
|
||||
span,
|
||||
}))
|
||||
})
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
ProbeKind::TraitCandidate { source: CandidateSource::BuiltinImpl(..), result: _ } => {
|
||||
cause = cause.derived_cause(parent_trait_pred, traits::BuiltinDerivedObligation);
|
||||
}
|
||||
_ => {}
|
||||
};
|
||||
cause
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ pub struct InspectGoal<'a, 'tcx> {
|
|||
result: Result<Certainty, NoSolution>,
|
||||
evaluation_kind: inspect::CanonicalGoalEvaluationKind<'tcx>,
|
||||
normalizes_to_term_hack: Option<NormalizesToTermHack<'tcx>>,
|
||||
source: GoalSource,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// The expected term of a `NormalizesTo` goal gets replaced
|
||||
|
@ -90,7 +91,7 @@ impl<'tcx> NormalizesToTermHack<'tcx> {
|
|||
pub struct InspectCandidate<'a, 'tcx> {
|
||||
goal: &'a InspectGoal<'a, 'tcx>,
|
||||
kind: inspect::ProbeKind<'tcx>,
|
||||
nested_goals: Vec<inspect::CanonicalState<'tcx, Goal<'tcx, ty::Predicate<'tcx>>>>,
|
||||
nested_goals: Vec<(GoalSource, inspect::CanonicalState<'tcx, Goal<'tcx, ty::Predicate<'tcx>>>)>,
|
||||
final_state: inspect::CanonicalState<'tcx, ()>,
|
||||
result: QueryResult<'tcx>,
|
||||
shallow_certainty: Certainty,
|
||||
|
@ -125,10 +126,8 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> InspectCandidate<'a, 'tcx> {
|
|||
/// back their inference constraints. This function modifies
|
||||
/// the state of the `infcx`.
|
||||
pub fn visit_nested_no_probe<V: ProofTreeVisitor<'tcx>>(&self, visitor: &mut V) -> V::Result {
|
||||
if self.goal.depth < visitor.config().max_depth {
|
||||
for goal in self.instantiate_nested_goals(visitor.span()) {
|
||||
try_visit!(visitor.visit_goal(&goal));
|
||||
}
|
||||
for goal in self.instantiate_nested_goals(visitor.span()) {
|
||||
try_visit!(goal.visit_with(visitor));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
V::Result::output()
|
||||
|
@ -143,13 +142,16 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> InspectCandidate<'a, 'tcx> {
|
|||
let instantiated_goals: Vec<_> = self
|
||||
.nested_goals
|
||||
.iter()
|
||||
.map(|goal| {
|
||||
canonical::instantiate_canonical_state(
|
||||
infcx,
|
||||
span,
|
||||
param_env,
|
||||
&mut orig_values,
|
||||
*goal,
|
||||
.map(|(source, goal)| {
|
||||
(
|
||||
*source,
|
||||
canonical::instantiate_canonical_state(
|
||||
infcx,
|
||||
span,
|
||||
param_env,
|
||||
&mut orig_values,
|
||||
*goal,
|
||||
),
|
||||
)
|
||||
})
|
||||
.collect();
|
||||
|
@ -171,7 +173,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> InspectCandidate<'a, 'tcx> {
|
|||
|
||||
instantiated_goals
|
||||
.into_iter()
|
||||
.map(|goal| match goal.predicate.kind().no_bound_vars() {
|
||||
.map(|(source, goal)| match goal.predicate.kind().no_bound_vars() {
|
||||
Some(ty::PredicateKind::NormalizesTo(ty::NormalizesTo { alias, term })) => {
|
||||
let unconstrained_term = match term.unpack() {
|
||||
ty::TermKind::Ty(_) => infcx
|
||||
|
@ -195,6 +197,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> InspectCandidate<'a, 'tcx> {
|
|||
self.goal.depth + 1,
|
||||
proof_tree.unwrap(),
|
||||
Some(NormalizesToTermHack { term, unconstrained_term }),
|
||||
source,
|
||||
)
|
||||
}
|
||||
_ => InspectGoal::new(
|
||||
|
@ -202,6 +205,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> InspectCandidate<'a, 'tcx> {
|
|||
self.goal.depth + 1,
|
||||
infcx.evaluate_root_goal(goal, GenerateProofTree::Yes).1.unwrap(),
|
||||
None,
|
||||
source,
|
||||
),
|
||||
})
|
||||
.collect()
|
||||
|
@ -227,16 +231,23 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> InspectGoal<'a, 'tcx> {
|
|||
self.result
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pub fn source(&self) -> GoalSource {
|
||||
self.source
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn candidates_recur(
|
||||
&'a self,
|
||||
candidates: &mut Vec<InspectCandidate<'a, 'tcx>>,
|
||||
nested_goals: &mut Vec<inspect::CanonicalState<'tcx, Goal<'tcx, ty::Predicate<'tcx>>>>,
|
||||
nested_goals: &mut Vec<(
|
||||
GoalSource,
|
||||
inspect::CanonicalState<'tcx, Goal<'tcx, ty::Predicate<'tcx>>>,
|
||||
)>,
|
||||
probe: &inspect::Probe<'tcx>,
|
||||
) {
|
||||
let mut shallow_certainty = None;
|
||||
for step in &probe.steps {
|
||||
match step {
|
||||
&inspect::ProbeStep::AddGoal(_source, goal) => nested_goals.push(goal),
|
||||
&inspect::ProbeStep::AddGoal(source, goal) => nested_goals.push((source, goal)),
|
||||
inspect::ProbeStep::NestedProbe(ref probe) => {
|
||||
// Nested probes have to prove goals added in their parent
|
||||
// but do not leak them, so we truncate the added goals
|
||||
|
@ -319,6 +330,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> InspectGoal<'a, 'tcx> {
|
|||
depth: usize,
|
||||
root: inspect::GoalEvaluation<'tcx>,
|
||||
normalizes_to_term_hack: Option<NormalizesToTermHack<'tcx>>,
|
||||
source: GoalSource,
|
||||
) -> Self {
|
||||
let inspect::GoalEvaluation { uncanonicalized_goal, kind, evaluation } = root;
|
||||
let inspect::GoalEvaluationKind::Root { orig_values } = kind else { unreachable!() };
|
||||
|
@ -341,8 +353,17 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> InspectGoal<'a, 'tcx> {
|
|||
result,
|
||||
evaluation_kind: evaluation.kind,
|
||||
normalizes_to_term_hack,
|
||||
source,
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pub(crate) fn visit_with<V: ProofTreeVisitor<'tcx>>(&self, visitor: &mut V) -> V::Result {
|
||||
if self.depth < visitor.config().max_depth {
|
||||
try_visit!(visitor.visit_goal(self));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
V::Result::output()
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// The public API to interact with proof trees.
|
||||
|
@ -367,6 +388,6 @@ impl<'tcx> InferCtxt<'tcx> {
|
|||
) -> V::Result {
|
||||
let (_, proof_tree) = self.evaluate_root_goal(goal, GenerateProofTree::Yes);
|
||||
let proof_tree = proof_tree.unwrap();
|
||||
visitor.visit_goal(&InspectGoal::new(self, 0, proof_tree, None))
|
||||
visitor.visit_goal(&InspectGoal::new(self, 0, proof_tree, None, GoalSource::Misc))
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ impl<'tcx> assembly::GoalKind<'tcx> for NormalizesTo<'tcx> {
|
|||
CandidateSource::BuiltinImpl(BuiltinImplSource::Misc),
|
||||
goal,
|
||||
pred,
|
||||
[goal.with(tcx, output_is_sized_pred)],
|
||||
[(GoalSource::ImplWhereBound, goal.with(tcx, output_is_sized_pred))],
|
||||
)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -473,7 +473,8 @@ impl<'tcx> assembly::GoalKind<'tcx> for NormalizesTo<'tcx> {
|
|||
pred,
|
||||
[goal.with(tcx, output_is_sized_pred)]
|
||||
.into_iter()
|
||||
.chain(nested_preds.into_iter().map(|pred| goal.with(tcx, pred))),
|
||||
.chain(nested_preds.into_iter().map(|pred| goal.with(tcx, pred)))
|
||||
.map(|goal| (GoalSource::ImplWhereBound, goal)),
|
||||
)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -321,7 +321,7 @@ impl<'tcx> assembly::GoalKind<'tcx> for TraitPredicate<'tcx> {
|
|||
CandidateSource::BuiltinImpl(BuiltinImplSource::Misc),
|
||||
goal,
|
||||
pred,
|
||||
[goal.with(tcx, output_is_sized_pred)],
|
||||
[(GoalSource::ImplWhereBound, goal.with(tcx, output_is_sized_pred))],
|
||||
)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -367,7 +367,8 @@ impl<'tcx> assembly::GoalKind<'tcx> for TraitPredicate<'tcx> {
|
|||
pred,
|
||||
[goal.with(tcx, output_is_sized_pred)]
|
||||
.into_iter()
|
||||
.chain(nested_preds.into_iter().map(|pred| goal.with(tcx, pred))),
|
||||
.chain(nested_preds.into_iter().map(|pred| goal.with(tcx, pred)))
|
||||
.map(|goal| (GoalSource::ImplWhereBound, goal)),
|
||||
)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue