Auto merge of #102618 - aliemjay:simplify-closure-promote, r=compiler-errors
rework applying closure requirements in borrowck Previously the promoted closure constraints were registered under the category `ConstraintCategory::ClosureBounds` in `type_check::prove_closure_bounds()` and then mapped back their original category in `regions_infer::best_blame_constraint` using the complicated map `closure_bounds_mapping`. Now we're registering promoted constraints under their original category and span earlier in `type_check::prove_closure_bounds`. See commit messages. Fixes #99245
This commit is contained in:
commit
e30fb6a26f
26 changed files with 173 additions and 349 deletions
|
@ -163,6 +163,7 @@ impl<'s, 'tcx, D: ConstraintGraphDirecton> Iterator for Edges<'s, 'tcx, D> {
|
|||
span: DUMMY_SP,
|
||||
category: ConstraintCategory::Internal,
|
||||
variance_info: VarianceDiagInfo::default(),
|
||||
from_closure: false,
|
||||
})
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
None
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -96,6 +96,9 @@ pub struct OutlivesConstraint<'tcx> {
|
|||
|
||||
/// Variance diagnostic information
|
||||
pub variance_info: VarianceDiagInfo<'tcx>,
|
||||
|
||||
/// If this constraint is promoted from closure requirements.
|
||||
pub from_closure: bool,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl<'tcx> fmt::Debug for OutlivesConstraint<'tcx> {
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -181,7 +181,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> MirBorrowckCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
|
|||
// Try to convert the lower-bound region into something named we can print for the user.
|
||||
let lower_bound_region = self.to_error_region(type_test.lower_bound);
|
||||
|
||||
let type_test_span = type_test.locations.span(&self.body);
|
||||
let type_test_span = type_test.span;
|
||||
|
||||
if let Some(lower_bound_region) = lower_bound_region {
|
||||
let generic_ty = type_test.generic_kind.to_ty(self.infcx.tcx);
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -242,7 +242,6 @@ pub(crate) fn compute_regions<'cx, 'tcx>(
|
|||
mut liveness_constraints,
|
||||
outlives_constraints,
|
||||
member_constraints,
|
||||
closure_bounds_mapping,
|
||||
universe_causes,
|
||||
type_tests,
|
||||
} = constraints;
|
||||
|
@ -264,7 +263,6 @@ pub(crate) fn compute_regions<'cx, 'tcx>(
|
|||
universal_region_relations,
|
||||
outlives_constraints,
|
||||
member_constraints,
|
||||
closure_bounds_mapping,
|
||||
universe_causes,
|
||||
type_tests,
|
||||
liveness_constraints,
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -74,8 +74,7 @@ impl<'tcx> RegionInferenceContext<'tcx> {
|
|||
let mut constraints: Vec<_> = self.constraints.outlives().iter().collect();
|
||||
constraints.sort_by_key(|c| (c.sup, c.sub));
|
||||
for constraint in &constraints {
|
||||
let OutlivesConstraint { sup, sub, locations, category, span, variance_info: _ } =
|
||||
constraint;
|
||||
let OutlivesConstraint { sup, sub, locations, category, span, .. } = constraint;
|
||||
let (name, arg) = match locations {
|
||||
Locations::All(span) => {
|
||||
("All", tcx.sess.source_map().span_to_embeddable_string(*span))
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -6,10 +6,9 @@ use rustc_data_structures::frozen::Frozen;
|
|||
use rustc_data_structures::fx::{FxHashMap, FxHashSet};
|
||||
use rustc_data_structures::graph::scc::Sccs;
|
||||
use rustc_errors::Diagnostic;
|
||||
use rustc_hir::def_id::{DefId, CRATE_DEF_ID};
|
||||
use rustc_hir::def_id::CRATE_DEF_ID;
|
||||
use rustc_hir::CRATE_HIR_ID;
|
||||
use rustc_index::vec::IndexVec;
|
||||
use rustc_infer::infer::canonical::QueryOutlivesConstraint;
|
||||
use rustc_infer::infer::outlives::test_type_match;
|
||||
use rustc_infer::infer::region_constraints::{GenericKind, VarInfos, VerifyBound, VerifyIfEq};
|
||||
use rustc_infer::infer::{InferCtxt, NllRegionVariableOrigin, RegionVariableOrigin};
|
||||
|
@ -19,9 +18,7 @@ use rustc_middle::mir::{
|
|||
};
|
||||
use rustc_middle::traits::ObligationCause;
|
||||
use rustc_middle::traits::ObligationCauseCode;
|
||||
use rustc_middle::ty::{
|
||||
self, subst::SubstsRef, RegionVid, Ty, TyCtxt, TypeFoldable, TypeVisitable,
|
||||
};
|
||||
use rustc_middle::ty::{self, RegionVid, Ty, TyCtxt, TypeFoldable, TypeVisitable};
|
||||
use rustc_span::Span;
|
||||
|
||||
use crate::{
|
||||
|
@ -89,10 +86,6 @@ pub struct RegionInferenceContext<'tcx> {
|
|||
/// `member_region_scc`.
|
||||
member_constraints_applied: Vec<AppliedMemberConstraint>,
|
||||
|
||||
/// Map closure bounds to a `Span` that should be used for error reporting.
|
||||
closure_bounds_mapping:
|
||||
FxHashMap<Location, FxHashMap<(RegionVid, RegionVid), (ConstraintCategory<'tcx>, Span)>>,
|
||||
|
||||
/// Map universe indexes to information on why we created it.
|
||||
universe_causes: FxHashMap<ty::UniverseIndex, UniverseInfo<'tcx>>,
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -221,8 +214,8 @@ pub struct TypeTest<'tcx> {
|
|||
/// The region `'x` that the type must outlive.
|
||||
pub lower_bound: RegionVid,
|
||||
|
||||
/// Where did this constraint arise and why?
|
||||
pub locations: Locations,
|
||||
/// The span to blame.
|
||||
pub span: Span,
|
||||
|
||||
/// A test which, if met by the region `'x`, proves that this type
|
||||
/// constraint is satisfied.
|
||||
|
@ -265,10 +258,6 @@ impl<'tcx> RegionInferenceContext<'tcx> {
|
|||
universal_region_relations: Frozen<UniversalRegionRelations<'tcx>>,
|
||||
outlives_constraints: OutlivesConstraintSet<'tcx>,
|
||||
member_constraints_in: MemberConstraintSet<'tcx, RegionVid>,
|
||||
closure_bounds_mapping: FxHashMap<
|
||||
Location,
|
||||
FxHashMap<(RegionVid, RegionVid), (ConstraintCategory<'tcx>, Span)>,
|
||||
>,
|
||||
universe_causes: FxHashMap<ty::UniverseIndex, UniverseInfo<'tcx>>,
|
||||
type_tests: Vec<TypeTest<'tcx>>,
|
||||
liveness_constraints: LivenessValues<RegionVid>,
|
||||
|
@ -310,7 +299,6 @@ impl<'tcx> RegionInferenceContext<'tcx> {
|
|||
rev_scc_graph: None,
|
||||
member_constraints,
|
||||
member_constraints_applied: Vec::new(),
|
||||
closure_bounds_mapping,
|
||||
universe_causes,
|
||||
scc_universes,
|
||||
scc_representatives,
|
||||
|
@ -882,13 +870,13 @@ impl<'tcx> RegionInferenceContext<'tcx> {
|
|||
if deduplicate_errors.insert((
|
||||
erased_generic_kind,
|
||||
type_test.lower_bound,
|
||||
type_test.locations,
|
||||
type_test.span,
|
||||
)) {
|
||||
debug!(
|
||||
"check_type_test: reporting error for erased_generic_kind={:?}, \
|
||||
lower_bound_region={:?}, \
|
||||
type_test.locations={:?}",
|
||||
erased_generic_kind, type_test.lower_bound, type_test.locations,
|
||||
type_test.span={:?}",
|
||||
erased_generic_kind, type_test.lower_bound, type_test.span,
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
errors_buffer.push(RegionErrorKind::TypeTestError { type_test: type_test.clone() });
|
||||
|
@ -931,7 +919,7 @@ impl<'tcx> RegionInferenceContext<'tcx> {
|
|||
) -> bool {
|
||||
let tcx = infcx.tcx;
|
||||
|
||||
let TypeTest { generic_kind, lower_bound, locations, verify_bound: _ } = type_test;
|
||||
let TypeTest { generic_kind, lower_bound, span: _, verify_bound: _ } = type_test;
|
||||
|
||||
let generic_ty = generic_kind.to_ty(tcx);
|
||||
let Some(subject) = self.try_promote_type_test_subject(infcx, generic_ty) else {
|
||||
|
@ -959,7 +947,7 @@ impl<'tcx> RegionInferenceContext<'tcx> {
|
|||
propagated_outlives_requirements.push(ClosureOutlivesRequirement {
|
||||
subject,
|
||||
outlived_free_region: static_r,
|
||||
blame_span: locations.span(body),
|
||||
blame_span: type_test.span,
|
||||
category: ConstraintCategory::Boring,
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -1011,7 +999,7 @@ impl<'tcx> RegionInferenceContext<'tcx> {
|
|||
let requirement = ClosureOutlivesRequirement {
|
||||
subject,
|
||||
outlived_free_region: upper_bound,
|
||||
blame_span: locations.span(body),
|
||||
blame_span: type_test.span,
|
||||
category: ConstraintCategory::Boring,
|
||||
};
|
||||
debug!("try_promote_type_test: pushing {:#?}", requirement);
|
||||
|
@ -1804,18 +1792,6 @@ impl<'tcx> RegionInferenceContext<'tcx> {
|
|||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pub(crate) fn retrieve_closure_constraint_info(
|
||||
&self,
|
||||
constraint: OutlivesConstraint<'tcx>,
|
||||
) -> Option<(ConstraintCategory<'tcx>, Span)> {
|
||||
match constraint.locations {
|
||||
Locations::All(_) => None,
|
||||
Locations::Single(loc) => {
|
||||
self.closure_bounds_mapping[&loc].get(&(constraint.sup, constraint.sub)).copied()
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Finds a good `ObligationCause` to blame for the fact that `fr1` outlives `fr2`.
|
||||
pub(crate) fn find_outlives_blame_span(
|
||||
&self,
|
||||
|
@ -1921,6 +1897,7 @@ impl<'tcx> RegionInferenceContext<'tcx> {
|
|||
span: p_c.definition_span,
|
||||
category: ConstraintCategory::OpaqueType,
|
||||
variance_info: ty::VarianceDiagInfo::default(),
|
||||
from_closure: false,
|
||||
};
|
||||
handle_constraint(constraint);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -2066,31 +2043,12 @@ impl<'tcx> RegionInferenceContext<'tcx> {
|
|||
// Classify each of the constraints along the path.
|
||||
let mut categorized_path: Vec<BlameConstraint<'tcx>> = path
|
||||
.iter()
|
||||
.map(|constraint| {
|
||||
let (category, span, from_closure, cause_code) =
|
||||
if constraint.category == ConstraintCategory::ClosureBounds {
|
||||
if let Some((category, span)) =
|
||||
self.retrieve_closure_constraint_info(*constraint)
|
||||
{
|
||||
(category, span, true, ObligationCauseCode::MiscObligation)
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
(
|
||||
constraint.category,
|
||||
constraint.span,
|
||||
false,
|
||||
ObligationCauseCode::MiscObligation,
|
||||
)
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
(constraint.category, constraint.span, false, cause_code.clone())
|
||||
};
|
||||
BlameConstraint {
|
||||
category,
|
||||
from_closure,
|
||||
cause: ObligationCause::new(span, CRATE_HIR_ID, cause_code),
|
||||
variance_info: constraint.variance_info,
|
||||
outlives_constraint: *constraint,
|
||||
}
|
||||
.map(|constraint| BlameConstraint {
|
||||
category: constraint.category,
|
||||
from_closure: constraint.from_closure,
|
||||
cause: ObligationCause::new(constraint.span, CRATE_HIR_ID, cause_code.clone()),
|
||||
variance_info: constraint.variance_info,
|
||||
outlives_constraint: *constraint,
|
||||
})
|
||||
.collect();
|
||||
debug!("categorized_path={:#?}", categorized_path);
|
||||
|
@ -2274,92 +2232,6 @@ impl<'tcx> RegionDefinition<'tcx> {
|
|||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pub trait ClosureRegionRequirementsExt<'tcx> {
|
||||
fn apply_requirements(
|
||||
&self,
|
||||
tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>,
|
||||
closure_def_id: DefId,
|
||||
closure_substs: SubstsRef<'tcx>,
|
||||
) -> Vec<QueryOutlivesConstraint<'tcx>>;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl<'tcx> ClosureRegionRequirementsExt<'tcx> for ClosureRegionRequirements<'tcx> {
|
||||
/// Given an instance T of the closure type, this method
|
||||
/// instantiates the "extra" requirements that we computed for the
|
||||
/// closure into the inference context. This has the effect of
|
||||
/// adding new outlives obligations to existing variables.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// As described on `ClosureRegionRequirements`, the extra
|
||||
/// requirements are expressed in terms of regionvids that index
|
||||
/// into the free regions that appear on the closure type. So, to
|
||||
/// do this, we first copy those regions out from the type T into
|
||||
/// a vector. Then we can just index into that vector to extract
|
||||
/// out the corresponding region from T and apply the
|
||||
/// requirements.
|
||||
fn apply_requirements(
|
||||
&self,
|
||||
tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>,
|
||||
closure_def_id: DefId,
|
||||
closure_substs: SubstsRef<'tcx>,
|
||||
) -> Vec<QueryOutlivesConstraint<'tcx>> {
|
||||
debug!(
|
||||
"apply_requirements(closure_def_id={:?}, closure_substs={:?})",
|
||||
closure_def_id, closure_substs
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
// Extract the values of the free regions in `closure_substs`
|
||||
// into a vector. These are the regions that we will be
|
||||
// relating to one another.
|
||||
let closure_mapping = &UniversalRegions::closure_mapping(
|
||||
tcx,
|
||||
closure_substs,
|
||||
self.num_external_vids,
|
||||
closure_def_id.expect_local(),
|
||||
);
|
||||
debug!("apply_requirements: closure_mapping={:?}", closure_mapping);
|
||||
|
||||
// Create the predicates.
|
||||
self.outlives_requirements
|
||||
.iter()
|
||||
.map(|outlives_requirement| {
|
||||
let outlived_region = closure_mapping[outlives_requirement.outlived_free_region];
|
||||
|
||||
match outlives_requirement.subject {
|
||||
ClosureOutlivesSubject::Region(region) => {
|
||||
let region = closure_mapping[region];
|
||||
debug!(
|
||||
"apply_requirements: region={:?} \
|
||||
outlived_region={:?} \
|
||||
outlives_requirement={:?}",
|
||||
region, outlived_region, outlives_requirement,
|
||||
);
|
||||
(
|
||||
ty::Binder::dummy(ty::OutlivesPredicate(
|
||||
region.into(),
|
||||
outlived_region,
|
||||
)),
|
||||
ConstraintCategory::BoringNoLocation,
|
||||
)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
ClosureOutlivesSubject::Ty(ty) => {
|
||||
debug!(
|
||||
"apply_requirements: ty={:?} \
|
||||
outlived_region={:?} \
|
||||
outlives_requirement={:?}",
|
||||
ty, outlived_region, outlives_requirement,
|
||||
);
|
||||
(
|
||||
ty::Binder::dummy(ty::OutlivesPredicate(ty.into(), outlived_region)),
|
||||
ConstraintCategory::BoringNoLocation,
|
||||
)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
})
|
||||
.collect()
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[derive(Clone, Debug)]
|
||||
pub struct BlameConstraint<'tcx> {
|
||||
pub category: ConstraintCategory<'tcx>,
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -1,10 +1,10 @@
|
|||
use rustc_infer::infer::canonical::QueryOutlivesConstraint;
|
||||
use rustc_hir::def_id::DefId;
|
||||
use rustc_infer::infer::canonical::QueryRegionConstraints;
|
||||
use rustc_infer::infer::outlives::env::RegionBoundPairs;
|
||||
use rustc_infer::infer::outlives::obligations::{TypeOutlives, TypeOutlivesDelegate};
|
||||
use rustc_infer::infer::region_constraints::{GenericKind, VerifyBound};
|
||||
use rustc_infer::infer::{self, InferCtxt, SubregionOrigin};
|
||||
use rustc_middle::mir::ConstraintCategory;
|
||||
use rustc_middle::mir::{ClosureOutlivesSubject, ClosureRegionRequirements, ConstraintCategory};
|
||||
use rustc_middle::ty::subst::GenericArgKind;
|
||||
use rustc_middle::ty::TypeFoldable;
|
||||
use rustc_middle::ty::{self, TyCtxt};
|
||||
|
@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ pub(crate) struct ConstraintConversion<'a, 'tcx> {
|
|||
locations: Locations,
|
||||
span: Span,
|
||||
category: ConstraintCategory<'tcx>,
|
||||
from_closure: bool,
|
||||
constraints: &'a mut MirTypeckRegionConstraints<'tcx>,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -64,6 +65,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> ConstraintConversion<'a, 'tcx> {
|
|||
span,
|
||||
category,
|
||||
constraints,
|
||||
from_closure: false,
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -81,12 +83,62 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> ConstraintConversion<'a, 'tcx> {
|
|||
}
|
||||
self.constraints.member_constraints = tmp;
|
||||
|
||||
for query_constraint in outlives {
|
||||
self.convert(query_constraint);
|
||||
for (predicate, constraint_category) in outlives {
|
||||
// At the moment, we never generate any "higher-ranked"
|
||||
// region constraints like `for<'a> 'a: 'b`. At some point
|
||||
// when we move to universes, we will, and this assertion
|
||||
// will start to fail.
|
||||
let predicate = predicate.no_bound_vars().unwrap_or_else(|| {
|
||||
bug!("query_constraint {:?} contained bound vars", predicate,);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
self.convert(predicate, *constraint_category);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn convert(&mut self, query_constraint: &QueryOutlivesConstraint<'tcx>) {
|
||||
/// Given an instance of the closure type, this method instantiates the "extra" requirements
|
||||
/// that we computed for the closure. This has the effect of adding new outlives obligations
|
||||
/// to existing region variables in `closure_substs`.
|
||||
#[instrument(skip(self), level = "debug")]
|
||||
pub fn apply_closure_requirements(
|
||||
&mut self,
|
||||
closure_requirements: &ClosureRegionRequirements<'tcx>,
|
||||
closure_def_id: DefId,
|
||||
closure_substs: ty::SubstsRef<'tcx>,
|
||||
) {
|
||||
// Extract the values of the free regions in `closure_substs`
|
||||
// into a vector. These are the regions that we will be
|
||||
// relating to one another.
|
||||
let closure_mapping = &UniversalRegions::closure_mapping(
|
||||
self.tcx,
|
||||
closure_substs,
|
||||
closure_requirements.num_external_vids,
|
||||
closure_def_id.expect_local(),
|
||||
);
|
||||
debug!(?closure_mapping);
|
||||
|
||||
// Create the predicates.
|
||||
let backup = (self.category, self.span, self.from_closure);
|
||||
self.from_closure = true;
|
||||
for outlives_requirement in &closure_requirements.outlives_requirements {
|
||||
let outlived_region = closure_mapping[outlives_requirement.outlived_free_region];
|
||||
let subject = match outlives_requirement.subject {
|
||||
ClosureOutlivesSubject::Region(re) => closure_mapping[re].into(),
|
||||
ClosureOutlivesSubject::Ty(ty) => ty.into(),
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
self.category = outlives_requirement.category;
|
||||
self.span = outlives_requirement.blame_span;
|
||||
self.convert(ty::OutlivesPredicate(subject, outlived_region), self.category);
|
||||
}
|
||||
(self.category, self.span, self.from_closure) = backup;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn convert(
|
||||
&mut self,
|
||||
predicate: ty::OutlivesPredicate<ty::GenericArg<'tcx>, ty::Region<'tcx>>,
|
||||
constraint_category: ConstraintCategory<'tcx>,
|
||||
) {
|
||||
debug!("generate: constraints at: {:#?}", self.locations);
|
||||
|
||||
// Extract out various useful fields we'll need below.
|
||||
|
@ -94,17 +146,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> ConstraintConversion<'a, 'tcx> {
|
|||
tcx, region_bound_pairs, implicit_region_bound, param_env, ..
|
||||
} = *self;
|
||||
|
||||
// At the moment, we never generate any "higher-ranked"
|
||||
// region constraints like `for<'a> 'a: 'b`. At some point
|
||||
// when we move to universes, we will, and this assertion
|
||||
// will start to fail.
|
||||
let ty::OutlivesPredicate(k1, r2) =
|
||||
query_constraint.0.no_bound_vars().unwrap_or_else(|| {
|
||||
bug!("query_constraint {:?} contained bound vars", query_constraint,);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
let constraint_category = query_constraint.1;
|
||||
|
||||
let ty::OutlivesPredicate(k1, r2) = predicate;
|
||||
match k1.unpack() {
|
||||
GenericArgKind::Lifetime(r1) => {
|
||||
let r1_vid = self.to_region_vid(r1);
|
||||
|
@ -127,10 +169,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> ConstraintConversion<'a, 'tcx> {
|
|||
.type_must_outlive(origin, t1, r2, constraint_category);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
GenericArgKind::Const(_) => {
|
||||
// Consts cannot outlive one another, so we
|
||||
// don't need to handle any relations here.
|
||||
}
|
||||
GenericArgKind::Const(_) => unreachable!(),
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -160,7 +199,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> ConstraintConversion<'a, 'tcx> {
|
|||
verify_bound: VerifyBound<'tcx>,
|
||||
) -> TypeTest<'tcx> {
|
||||
let lower_bound = self.to_region_vid(region);
|
||||
TypeTest { generic_kind, lower_bound, locations: self.locations, verify_bound }
|
||||
TypeTest { generic_kind, lower_bound, span: self.span, verify_bound }
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn to_region_vid(&mut self, r: ty::Region<'tcx>) -> ty::RegionVid {
|
||||
|
@ -188,6 +227,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> ConstraintConversion<'a, 'tcx> {
|
|||
sub,
|
||||
sup,
|
||||
variance_info: ty::VarianceDiagInfo::default(),
|
||||
from_closure: self.from_closure,
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ use rustc_middle::mir::AssertKind;
|
|||
use rustc_middle::mir::*;
|
||||
use rustc_middle::ty::adjustment::PointerCast;
|
||||
use rustc_middle::ty::cast::CastTy;
|
||||
use rustc_middle::ty::subst::{GenericArgKind, SubstsRef, UserSubsts};
|
||||
use rustc_middle::ty::subst::{SubstsRef, UserSubsts};
|
||||
use rustc_middle::ty::visit::TypeVisitable;
|
||||
use rustc_middle::ty::{
|
||||
self, Binder, CanonicalUserTypeAnnotation, CanonicalUserTypeAnnotations, Dynamic,
|
||||
|
@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ use crate::{
|
|||
region_infer::values::{
|
||||
LivenessValues, PlaceholderIndex, PlaceholderIndices, RegionValueElements,
|
||||
},
|
||||
region_infer::{ClosureRegionRequirementsExt, TypeTest},
|
||||
region_infer::TypeTest,
|
||||
type_check::free_region_relations::{CreateResult, UniversalRegionRelations},
|
||||
universal_regions::{DefiningTy, UniversalRegions},
|
||||
Upvar,
|
||||
|
@ -144,7 +144,6 @@ pub(crate) fn type_check<'mir, 'tcx>(
|
|||
liveness_constraints: LivenessValues::new(elements.clone()),
|
||||
outlives_constraints: OutlivesConstraintSet::default(),
|
||||
member_constraints: MemberConstraintSet::default(),
|
||||
closure_bounds_mapping: Default::default(),
|
||||
type_tests: Vec::default(),
|
||||
universe_causes: FxHashMap::default(),
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
@ -584,8 +583,6 @@ impl<'a, 'b, 'tcx> TypeVerifier<'a, 'b, 'tcx> {
|
|||
// modify their locations.
|
||||
let all_facts = &mut None;
|
||||
let mut constraints = Default::default();
|
||||
let mut type_tests = Default::default();
|
||||
let mut closure_bounds = Default::default();
|
||||
let mut liveness_constraints =
|
||||
LivenessValues::new(Rc::new(RegionValueElements::new(&promoted_body)));
|
||||
// Don't try to add borrow_region facts for the promoted MIR
|
||||
|
@ -596,11 +593,6 @@ impl<'a, 'b, 'tcx> TypeVerifier<'a, 'b, 'tcx> {
|
|||
&mut this.cx.borrowck_context.constraints.outlives_constraints,
|
||||
&mut constraints,
|
||||
);
|
||||
mem::swap(&mut this.cx.borrowck_context.constraints.type_tests, &mut type_tests);
|
||||
mem::swap(
|
||||
&mut this.cx.borrowck_context.constraints.closure_bounds_mapping,
|
||||
&mut closure_bounds,
|
||||
);
|
||||
mem::swap(
|
||||
&mut this.cx.borrowck_context.constraints.liveness_constraints,
|
||||
&mut liveness_constraints,
|
||||
|
@ -621,13 +613,6 @@ impl<'a, 'b, 'tcx> TypeVerifier<'a, 'b, 'tcx> {
|
|||
swap_constraints(self);
|
||||
|
||||
let locations = location.to_locations();
|
||||
|
||||
// Use location of promoted const in collected constraints
|
||||
for type_test in type_tests.iter() {
|
||||
let mut type_test = type_test.clone();
|
||||
type_test.locations = locations;
|
||||
self.cx.borrowck_context.constraints.type_tests.push(type_test)
|
||||
}
|
||||
for constraint in constraints.outlives().iter() {
|
||||
let mut constraint = constraint.clone();
|
||||
constraint.locations = locations;
|
||||
|
@ -653,18 +638,6 @@ impl<'a, 'b, 'tcx> TypeVerifier<'a, 'b, 'tcx> {
|
|||
.add_element(region, location);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if !closure_bounds.is_empty() {
|
||||
let combined_bounds_mapping =
|
||||
closure_bounds.into_iter().flat_map(|(_, value)| value).collect();
|
||||
let existing = self
|
||||
.cx
|
||||
.borrowck_context
|
||||
.constraints
|
||||
.closure_bounds_mapping
|
||||
.insert(location, combined_bounds_mapping);
|
||||
assert!(existing.is_none(), "Multiple promoteds/closures at the same location.");
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn sanitize_projection(
|
||||
|
@ -941,9 +914,6 @@ pub(crate) struct MirTypeckRegionConstraints<'tcx> {
|
|||
|
||||
pub(crate) member_constraints: MemberConstraintSet<'tcx, RegionVid>,
|
||||
|
||||
pub(crate) closure_bounds_mapping:
|
||||
FxHashMap<Location, FxHashMap<(RegionVid, RegionVid), (ConstraintCategory<'tcx>, Span)>>,
|
||||
|
||||
pub(crate) universe_causes: FxHashMap<ty::UniverseIndex, UniverseInfo<'tcx>>,
|
||||
|
||||
pub(crate) type_tests: Vec<TypeTest<'tcx>>,
|
||||
|
@ -2562,6 +2532,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> TypeChecker<'a, 'tcx> {
|
|||
span: location.to_locations().span(body),
|
||||
category,
|
||||
variance_info: ty::VarianceDiagInfo::default(),
|
||||
from_closure: false,
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
match mutbl {
|
||||
|
@ -2679,62 +2650,22 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> TypeChecker<'a, 'tcx> {
|
|||
substs: SubstsRef<'tcx>,
|
||||
location: Location,
|
||||
) -> ty::InstantiatedPredicates<'tcx> {
|
||||
if let Some(ref closure_region_requirements) = tcx.mir_borrowck(def_id).closure_requirements
|
||||
{
|
||||
let closure_constraints = QueryRegionConstraints {
|
||||
outlives: closure_region_requirements.apply_requirements(
|
||||
tcx,
|
||||
def_id.to_def_id(),
|
||||
substs,
|
||||
),
|
||||
|
||||
// Presently, closures never propagate member
|
||||
// constraints to their parents -- they are enforced
|
||||
// locally. This is largely a non-issue as member
|
||||
// constraints only come from `-> impl Trait` and
|
||||
// friends which don't appear (thus far...) in
|
||||
// closures.
|
||||
member_constraints: vec![],
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
let bounds_mapping = closure_constraints
|
||||
.outlives
|
||||
.iter()
|
||||
.enumerate()
|
||||
.filter_map(|(idx, constraint)| {
|
||||
let ty::OutlivesPredicate(k1, r2) =
|
||||
constraint.0.no_bound_vars().unwrap_or_else(|| {
|
||||
bug!("query_constraint {:?} contained bound vars", constraint,);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
match k1.unpack() {
|
||||
GenericArgKind::Lifetime(r1) => {
|
||||
// constraint is r1: r2
|
||||
let r1_vid = self.borrowck_context.universal_regions.to_region_vid(r1);
|
||||
let r2_vid = self.borrowck_context.universal_regions.to_region_vid(r2);
|
||||
let outlives_requirements =
|
||||
&closure_region_requirements.outlives_requirements[idx];
|
||||
Some((
|
||||
(r1_vid, r2_vid),
|
||||
(outlives_requirements.category, outlives_requirements.blame_span),
|
||||
))
|
||||
}
|
||||
GenericArgKind::Type(_) | GenericArgKind::Const(_) => None,
|
||||
}
|
||||
})
|
||||
.collect();
|
||||
|
||||
let existing = self
|
||||
.borrowck_context
|
||||
.constraints
|
||||
.closure_bounds_mapping
|
||||
.insert(location, bounds_mapping);
|
||||
assert!(existing.is_none(), "Multiple closures at the same location.");
|
||||
|
||||
self.push_region_constraints(
|
||||
if let Some(ref closure_requirements) = tcx.mir_borrowck(def_id).closure_requirements {
|
||||
constraint_conversion::ConstraintConversion::new(
|
||||
self.infcx,
|
||||
self.borrowck_context.universal_regions,
|
||||
self.region_bound_pairs,
|
||||
self.implicit_region_bound,
|
||||
self.param_env,
|
||||
location.to_locations(),
|
||||
ConstraintCategory::ClosureBounds,
|
||||
&closure_constraints,
|
||||
DUMMY_SP, // irrelevant; will be overrided.
|
||||
ConstraintCategory::Boring, // same as above.
|
||||
&mut self.borrowck_context.constraints,
|
||||
)
|
||||
.apply_closure_requirements(
|
||||
&closure_requirements,
|
||||
def_id.to_def_id(),
|
||||
substs,
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -136,6 +136,7 @@ impl<'tcx> TypeRelatingDelegate<'tcx> for NllTypeRelatingDelegate<'_, '_, 'tcx>
|
|||
span: self.locations.span(self.type_checker.body),
|
||||
category: self.category,
|
||||
variance_info: info,
|
||||
from_closure: false,
|
||||
},
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue