bjoernager/rust
bjoernager/rust
1
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Activity

Don't stop const-checking after erroneous trait bound

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Dylan MacKenzie 2020-09-29 18:52:00 -07:00
parent 879d3794d3
commit e02ea835a7
2 changed files with 17 additions and 6 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

12
compiler/rustc_mir/src/transform/check_consts/validation.rs
View file

@ -364,11 +364,11 @@ impl Validator<'mir, 'tcx> {
match pred.skip_binder() {
ty::ExistentialPredicate::AutoTrait(_)
| ty::ExistentialPredicate::Projection(_) => {
self.check_op(ops::ty::TraitBound)
self.check_op(ops::ty::TraitBound(kind))
}
ty::ExistentialPredicate::Trait(trait_ref) => {
if Some(trait_ref.def_id) != self.tcx.lang_items().sized_trait() {
self.check_op(ops::ty::TraitBound)
self.check_op(ops::ty::TraitBound(kind))
}
}
}
@ -413,15 +413,19 @@ impl Validator<'mir, 'tcx> {
let def = generics.type_param(p, tcx);
let span = tcx.def_span(def.def_id);
// These are part of the function signature, so treat them like
// arguments when determining importance.
let kind = LocalKind::Arg;
if constness == hir::Constness::Const {
self.check_op_spanned(ops::ty::TraitBound, span);
self.check_op_spanned(ops::ty::TraitBound(kind), span);
} else if !tcx.features().const_fn
|| self.ccx.is_const_stable_const_fn()
{
// HACK: We shouldn't need the conditional above, but trait
// bounds on containing impl blocks are wrongly being marked as
// "not-const".
self.check_op_spanned(ops::ty::TraitBound, span);
self.check_op_spanned(ops::ty::TraitBound(kind), span);
}
}
// other kinds of bounds are either tautologies