Rollup merge of #99692 - RalfJung:too-far, r=oli-obk
interpret, ptr_offset_from: refactor and test too-far-apart check We didn't have any tests for the "too far apart" message, and indeed that check mostly relied on the in-bounds check and was otherwise probably not entirely correct... so I rewrote that check, and it is before the in-bounds check so we can test it separately.
This commit is contained in:
commit
deab13c681
6 changed files with 153 additions and 48 deletions
|
@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ use std::convert::TryFrom;
|
|||
use rustc_hir::def_id::DefId;
|
||||
use rustc_middle::mir::{
|
||||
self,
|
||||
interpret::{ConstValue, GlobalId, InterpResult, Scalar},
|
||||
interpret::{ConstValue, GlobalId, InterpResult, PointerArithmetic, Scalar},
|
||||
BinOp,
|
||||
};
|
||||
use rustc_middle::ty;
|
||||
|
@ -328,7 +328,7 @@ impl<'mir, 'tcx: 'mir, M: Machine<'mir, 'tcx>> InterpCx<'mir, 'tcx, M> {
|
|||
// We managed to find a valid allocation for one pointer, but not the other.
|
||||
// That means they are definitely not pointing to the same allocation.
|
||||
throw_ub_format!(
|
||||
"{} called on pointers into different allocations",
|
||||
"`{}` called on pointers into different allocations",
|
||||
intrinsic_name
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -336,7 +336,7 @@ impl<'mir, 'tcx: 'mir, M: Machine<'mir, 'tcx>> InterpCx<'mir, 'tcx, M> {
|
|||
// Found allocation for both. They must be into the same allocation.
|
||||
if a_alloc_id != b_alloc_id {
|
||||
throw_ub_format!(
|
||||
"{} called on pointers into different allocations",
|
||||
"`{}` called on pointers into different allocations",
|
||||
intrinsic_name
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -346,47 +346,71 @@ impl<'mir, 'tcx: 'mir, M: Machine<'mir, 'tcx>> InterpCx<'mir, 'tcx, M> {
|
|||
};
|
||||
|
||||
// Compute distance.
|
||||
let distance = {
|
||||
// The subtraction is always done in `isize` to enforce
|
||||
// the "no more than `isize::MAX` apart" requirement.
|
||||
let a_offset = ImmTy::from_uint(a_offset, isize_layout);
|
||||
let b_offset = ImmTy::from_uint(b_offset, isize_layout);
|
||||
let (val, overflowed, _ty) =
|
||||
self.overflowing_binary_op(BinOp::Sub, &a_offset, &b_offset)?;
|
||||
let dist = {
|
||||
// Addresses are unsigned, so this is a `usize` computation. We have to do the
|
||||
// overflow check separately anyway.
|
||||
let (val, overflowed, _ty) = {
|
||||
let a_offset = ImmTy::from_uint(a_offset, usize_layout);
|
||||
let b_offset = ImmTy::from_uint(b_offset, usize_layout);
|
||||
self.overflowing_binary_op(BinOp::Sub, &a_offset, &b_offset)?
|
||||
};
|
||||
if overflowed {
|
||||
throw_ub_format!("pointers were too far apart for {}", intrinsic_name);
|
||||
// a < b
|
||||
if intrinsic_name == sym::ptr_offset_from_unsigned {
|
||||
throw_ub_format!(
|
||||
"`{}` called when first pointer has smaller offset than second: {} < {}",
|
||||
intrinsic_name,
|
||||
a_offset,
|
||||
b_offset,
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
// The signed form of the intrinsic allows this. If we interpret the
|
||||
// difference as isize, we'll get the proper signed difference. If that
|
||||
// seems *positive*, they were more than isize::MAX apart.
|
||||
let dist = val.to_machine_isize(self)?;
|
||||
if dist >= 0 {
|
||||
throw_ub_format!(
|
||||
"`{}` called when first pointer is too far before second",
|
||||
intrinsic_name
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
dist
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
// b >= a
|
||||
let dist = val.to_machine_isize(self)?;
|
||||
// If converting to isize produced a *negative* result, we had an overflow
|
||||
// because they were more than isize::MAX apart.
|
||||
if dist < 0 {
|
||||
throw_ub_format!(
|
||||
"`{}` called when first pointer is too far ahead of second",
|
||||
intrinsic_name
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
dist
|
||||
}
|
||||
val.to_machine_isize(self)?
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
// Check that the range between them is dereferenceable ("in-bounds or one past the
|
||||
// end of the same allocation"). This is like the check in ptr_offset_inbounds.
|
||||
let min_ptr = if distance >= 0 { b } else { a };
|
||||
let min_ptr = if dist >= 0 { b } else { a };
|
||||
self.check_ptr_access_align(
|
||||
min_ptr,
|
||||
Size::from_bytes(distance.unsigned_abs()),
|
||||
Size::from_bytes(dist.unsigned_abs()),
|
||||
Align::ONE,
|
||||
CheckInAllocMsg::OffsetFromTest,
|
||||
)?;
|
||||
|
||||
if intrinsic_name == sym::ptr_offset_from_unsigned && distance < 0 {
|
||||
throw_ub_format!(
|
||||
"{} called when first pointer has smaller offset than second: {} < {}",
|
||||
intrinsic_name,
|
||||
a_offset,
|
||||
b_offset,
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Perform division by size to compute return value.
|
||||
let ret_layout = if intrinsic_name == sym::ptr_offset_from_unsigned {
|
||||
assert!(0 <= dist && dist <= self.machine_isize_max());
|
||||
usize_layout
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
assert!(self.machine_isize_min() <= dist && dist <= self.machine_isize_max());
|
||||
isize_layout
|
||||
};
|
||||
let pointee_layout = self.layout_of(substs.type_at(0))?;
|
||||
// If ret_layout is unsigned, we checked that so is the distance, so we are good.
|
||||
let val = ImmTy::from_int(distance, ret_layout);
|
||||
let val = ImmTy::from_int(dist, ret_layout);
|
||||
let size = ImmTy::from_int(pointee_layout.size.bytes(), ret_layout);
|
||||
self.exact_div(&val, &size, dest)?;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue