proof trees: use for intercrate_ambiguity_causes
This commit is contained in:
parent
4fda889bf8
commit
de53877f8b
9 changed files with 818 additions and 282 deletions
522
compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/solve/inspect/build.rs
Normal file
522
compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/solve/inspect/build.rs
Normal file
|
@ -0,0 +1,522 @@
|
|||
//! Building proof trees incrementally during trait solving.
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! This code is *a bit* of a mess and can hopefully be
|
||||
//! mostly ignored. For a general overview of how it works,
|
||||
//! see the comment on [ProofTreeBuilder].
|
||||
use rustc_middle::traits::query::NoSolution;
|
||||
use rustc_middle::traits::solve::{
|
||||
CanonicalInput, Certainty, Goal, IsNormalizesToHack, QueryInput, QueryResult,
|
||||
};
|
||||
use rustc_middle::ty::{self, TyCtxt};
|
||||
use rustc_session::config::DumpSolverProofTree;
|
||||
|
||||
use crate::solve::eval_ctxt::UseGlobalCache;
|
||||
use crate::solve::{self, inspect, EvalCtxt, GenerateProofTree};
|
||||
|
||||
/// The core data structure when building proof trees.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// In case the current evaluation does not generate a proof
|
||||
/// tree, `state` is simply `None` and we avoid any work.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// The possible states of the solver are represented via
|
||||
/// variants of [DebugSolver]. For any nested computation we call
|
||||
/// `ProofTreeBuilder::new_nested_computation_kind` which
|
||||
/// creates a new `ProofTreeBuilder` to temporarily replace the
|
||||
/// current one. Once that nested computation is done,
|
||||
/// `ProofTreeBuilder::nested_computation_kind` is called
|
||||
/// to add the finished nested evaluation to the parent.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// We provide additional information to the current state
|
||||
/// by calling methods such as `ProofTreeBuilder::probe_kind`.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// The actual structure closely mirrors the finished proof
|
||||
/// trees. At the end of trait solving `ProofTreeBuilder::finalize`
|
||||
/// is called to recursively convert the whole structure to a
|
||||
/// finished proof tree.
|
||||
pub(in crate::solve) struct ProofTreeBuilder<'tcx> {
|
||||
state: Option<Box<BuilderData<'tcx>>>,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
struct BuilderData<'tcx> {
|
||||
tree: DebugSolver<'tcx>,
|
||||
use_global_cache: UseGlobalCache,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// The current state of the proof tree builder, at most places
|
||||
/// in the code, only one or two variants are actually possible.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// We simply ICE in case that assumption is broken.
|
||||
#[derive(Debug)]
|
||||
enum DebugSolver<'tcx> {
|
||||
Root,
|
||||
GoalEvaluation(WipGoalEvaluation<'tcx>),
|
||||
CanonicalGoalEvaluation(WipCanonicalGoalEvaluation<'tcx>),
|
||||
AddedGoalsEvaluation(WipAddedGoalsEvaluation<'tcx>),
|
||||
GoalEvaluationStep(WipGoalEvaluationStep<'tcx>),
|
||||
Probe(WipProbe<'tcx>),
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl<'tcx> From<WipGoalEvaluation<'tcx>> for DebugSolver<'tcx> {
|
||||
fn from(g: WipGoalEvaluation<'tcx>) -> DebugSolver<'tcx> {
|
||||
DebugSolver::GoalEvaluation(g)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl<'tcx> From<WipCanonicalGoalEvaluation<'tcx>> for DebugSolver<'tcx> {
|
||||
fn from(g: WipCanonicalGoalEvaluation<'tcx>) -> DebugSolver<'tcx> {
|
||||
DebugSolver::CanonicalGoalEvaluation(g)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl<'tcx> From<WipAddedGoalsEvaluation<'tcx>> for DebugSolver<'tcx> {
|
||||
fn from(g: WipAddedGoalsEvaluation<'tcx>) -> DebugSolver<'tcx> {
|
||||
DebugSolver::AddedGoalsEvaluation(g)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl<'tcx> From<WipGoalEvaluationStep<'tcx>> for DebugSolver<'tcx> {
|
||||
fn from(g: WipGoalEvaluationStep<'tcx>) -> DebugSolver<'tcx> {
|
||||
DebugSolver::GoalEvaluationStep(g)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl<'tcx> From<WipProbe<'tcx>> for DebugSolver<'tcx> {
|
||||
fn from(p: WipProbe<'tcx>) -> DebugSolver<'tcx> {
|
||||
DebugSolver::Probe(p)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[derive(Eq, PartialEq, Debug)]
|
||||
struct WipGoalEvaluation<'tcx> {
|
||||
pub uncanonicalized_goal: Goal<'tcx, ty::Predicate<'tcx>>,
|
||||
pub kind: WipGoalEvaluationKind<'tcx>,
|
||||
pub evaluation: Option<WipCanonicalGoalEvaluation<'tcx>>,
|
||||
pub returned_goals: Vec<Goal<'tcx, ty::Predicate<'tcx>>>,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl<'tcx> WipGoalEvaluation<'tcx> {
|
||||
fn finalize(self) -> inspect::GoalEvaluation<'tcx> {
|
||||
inspect::GoalEvaluation {
|
||||
uncanonicalized_goal: self.uncanonicalized_goal,
|
||||
kind: match self.kind {
|
||||
WipGoalEvaluationKind::Root { orig_values } => {
|
||||
inspect::GoalEvaluationKind::Root { orig_values }
|
||||
}
|
||||
WipGoalEvaluationKind::Nested { is_normalizes_to_hack } => {
|
||||
inspect::GoalEvaluationKind::Nested { is_normalizes_to_hack }
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
evaluation: self.evaluation.unwrap().finalize(),
|
||||
returned_goals: self.returned_goals,
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[derive(Eq, PartialEq, Debug)]
|
||||
pub(in crate::solve) enum WipGoalEvaluationKind<'tcx> {
|
||||
Root { orig_values: Vec<ty::GenericArg<'tcx>> },
|
||||
Nested { is_normalizes_to_hack: IsNormalizesToHack },
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[derive(Eq, PartialEq, Debug)]
|
||||
pub(in crate::solve) enum WipCanonicalGoalEvaluationKind {
|
||||
Overflow,
|
||||
CacheHit(inspect::CacheHit),
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[derive(Eq, PartialEq, Debug)]
|
||||
struct WipCanonicalGoalEvaluation<'tcx> {
|
||||
goal: CanonicalInput<'tcx>,
|
||||
kind: Option<WipCanonicalGoalEvaluationKind>,
|
||||
revisions: Vec<WipGoalEvaluationStep<'tcx>>,
|
||||
result: Option<QueryResult<'tcx>>,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl<'tcx> WipCanonicalGoalEvaluation<'tcx> {
|
||||
fn finalize(self) -> inspect::CanonicalGoalEvaluation<'tcx> {
|
||||
let kind = match self.kind {
|
||||
Some(WipCanonicalGoalEvaluationKind::Overflow) => {
|
||||
inspect::CanonicalGoalEvaluationKind::Overflow
|
||||
}
|
||||
Some(WipCanonicalGoalEvaluationKind::CacheHit(hit)) => {
|
||||
inspect::CanonicalGoalEvaluationKind::CacheHit(hit)
|
||||
}
|
||||
None => inspect::CanonicalGoalEvaluationKind::Uncached {
|
||||
revisions: self
|
||||
.revisions
|
||||
.into_iter()
|
||||
.map(WipGoalEvaluationStep::finalize)
|
||||
.collect(),
|
||||
},
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
inspect::CanonicalGoalEvaluation { goal: self.goal, kind, result: self.result.unwrap() }
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[derive(Eq, PartialEq, Debug)]
|
||||
struct WipAddedGoalsEvaluation<'tcx> {
|
||||
evaluations: Vec<Vec<WipGoalEvaluation<'tcx>>>,
|
||||
result: Option<Result<Certainty, NoSolution>>,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl<'tcx> WipAddedGoalsEvaluation<'tcx> {
|
||||
fn finalize(self) -> inspect::AddedGoalsEvaluation<'tcx> {
|
||||
inspect::AddedGoalsEvaluation {
|
||||
evaluations: self
|
||||
.evaluations
|
||||
.into_iter()
|
||||
.map(|evaluations| {
|
||||
evaluations.into_iter().map(WipGoalEvaluation::finalize).collect()
|
||||
})
|
||||
.collect(),
|
||||
result: self.result.unwrap(),
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[derive(Eq, PartialEq, Debug)]
|
||||
struct WipGoalEvaluationStep<'tcx> {
|
||||
instantiated_goal: QueryInput<'tcx, ty::Predicate<'tcx>>,
|
||||
|
||||
evaluation: WipProbe<'tcx>,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl<'tcx> WipGoalEvaluationStep<'tcx> {
|
||||
fn finalize(self) -> inspect::GoalEvaluationStep<'tcx> {
|
||||
let evaluation = self.evaluation.finalize();
|
||||
match evaluation.kind {
|
||||
inspect::ProbeKind::Root { .. } => (),
|
||||
_ => unreachable!("unexpected root evaluation: {evaluation:?}"),
|
||||
}
|
||||
inspect::GoalEvaluationStep { instantiated_goal: self.instantiated_goal, evaluation }
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[derive(Eq, PartialEq, Debug)]
|
||||
struct WipProbe<'tcx> {
|
||||
pub steps: Vec<WipProbeStep<'tcx>>,
|
||||
pub kind: Option<inspect::ProbeKind<'tcx>>,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl<'tcx> WipProbe<'tcx> {
|
||||
fn finalize(self) -> inspect::Probe<'tcx> {
|
||||
inspect::Probe {
|
||||
steps: self.steps.into_iter().map(WipProbeStep::finalize).collect(),
|
||||
kind: self.kind.unwrap(),
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[derive(Eq, PartialEq, Debug)]
|
||||
enum WipProbeStep<'tcx> {
|
||||
AddGoal(inspect::CanonicalState<'tcx, Goal<'tcx, ty::Predicate<'tcx>>>),
|
||||
EvaluateGoals(WipAddedGoalsEvaluation<'tcx>),
|
||||
NestedProbe(WipProbe<'tcx>),
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl<'tcx> WipProbeStep<'tcx> {
|
||||
fn finalize(self) -> inspect::ProbeStep<'tcx> {
|
||||
match self {
|
||||
WipProbeStep::AddGoal(goal) => inspect::ProbeStep::AddGoal(goal),
|
||||
WipProbeStep::EvaluateGoals(eval) => inspect::ProbeStep::EvaluateGoals(eval.finalize()),
|
||||
WipProbeStep::NestedProbe(probe) => inspect::ProbeStep::NestedProbe(probe.finalize()),
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl<'tcx> ProofTreeBuilder<'tcx> {
|
||||
fn new(
|
||||
state: impl Into<DebugSolver<'tcx>>,
|
||||
use_global_cache: UseGlobalCache,
|
||||
) -> ProofTreeBuilder<'tcx> {
|
||||
ProofTreeBuilder {
|
||||
state: Some(Box::new(BuilderData { tree: state.into(), use_global_cache })),
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn nested<T: Into<DebugSolver<'tcx>>>(&self, state: impl FnOnce() -> T) -> Self {
|
||||
match &self.state {
|
||||
Some(prev_state) => Self {
|
||||
state: Some(Box::new(BuilderData {
|
||||
tree: state().into(),
|
||||
use_global_cache: prev_state.use_global_cache,
|
||||
})),
|
||||
},
|
||||
None => Self { state: None },
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn as_mut(&mut self) -> Option<&mut DebugSolver<'tcx>> {
|
||||
self.state.as_mut().map(|boxed| &mut boxed.tree)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pub fn finalize(self) -> Option<inspect::GoalEvaluation<'tcx>> {
|
||||
match self.state?.tree {
|
||||
DebugSolver::GoalEvaluation(wip_goal_evaluation) => {
|
||||
Some(wip_goal_evaluation.finalize())
|
||||
}
|
||||
root => unreachable!("unexpected proof tree builder root node: {:?}", root),
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pub fn use_global_cache(&self) -> bool {
|
||||
self.state
|
||||
.as_ref()
|
||||
.map(|state| matches!(state.use_global_cache, UseGlobalCache::Yes))
|
||||
.unwrap_or(true)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pub fn new_maybe_root(
|
||||
tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>,
|
||||
generate_proof_tree: GenerateProofTree,
|
||||
) -> ProofTreeBuilder<'tcx> {
|
||||
match generate_proof_tree {
|
||||
GenerateProofTree::Never => ProofTreeBuilder::new_noop(),
|
||||
GenerateProofTree::IfEnabled => {
|
||||
let opts = &tcx.sess.opts.unstable_opts;
|
||||
match opts.dump_solver_proof_tree {
|
||||
DumpSolverProofTree::Always => {
|
||||
let use_cache = opts.dump_solver_proof_tree_use_cache.unwrap_or(true);
|
||||
ProofTreeBuilder::new_root(UseGlobalCache::from_bool(use_cache))
|
||||
}
|
||||
// `OnError` is handled by reevaluating goals in error
|
||||
// reporting with `GenerateProofTree::Yes`.
|
||||
DumpSolverProofTree::OnError | DumpSolverProofTree::Never => {
|
||||
ProofTreeBuilder::new_noop()
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
GenerateProofTree::Yes(use_cache) => ProofTreeBuilder::new_root(use_cache),
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pub fn new_root(use_global_cache: UseGlobalCache) -> ProofTreeBuilder<'tcx> {
|
||||
ProofTreeBuilder::new(DebugSolver::Root, use_global_cache)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pub fn new_noop() -> ProofTreeBuilder<'tcx> {
|
||||
ProofTreeBuilder { state: None }
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pub fn is_noop(&self) -> bool {
|
||||
self.state.is_none()
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pub(in crate::solve) fn new_goal_evaluation(
|
||||
&mut self,
|
||||
goal: Goal<'tcx, ty::Predicate<'tcx>>,
|
||||
orig_values: &[ty::GenericArg<'tcx>],
|
||||
kind: solve::GoalEvaluationKind,
|
||||
) -> ProofTreeBuilder<'tcx> {
|
||||
self.nested(|| WipGoalEvaluation {
|
||||
uncanonicalized_goal: goal,
|
||||
kind: match kind {
|
||||
solve::GoalEvaluationKind::Root => {
|
||||
WipGoalEvaluationKind::Root { orig_values: orig_values.to_vec() }
|
||||
}
|
||||
solve::GoalEvaluationKind::Nested { is_normalizes_to_hack } => {
|
||||
WipGoalEvaluationKind::Nested { is_normalizes_to_hack }
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
evaluation: None,
|
||||
returned_goals: vec![],
|
||||
})
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pub fn new_canonical_goal_evaluation(
|
||||
&mut self,
|
||||
goal: CanonicalInput<'tcx>,
|
||||
) -> ProofTreeBuilder<'tcx> {
|
||||
self.nested(|| WipCanonicalGoalEvaluation {
|
||||
goal,
|
||||
kind: None,
|
||||
revisions: vec![],
|
||||
result: None,
|
||||
})
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pub fn canonical_goal_evaluation(&mut self, canonical_goal_evaluation: ProofTreeBuilder<'tcx>) {
|
||||
if let Some(this) = self.as_mut() {
|
||||
match (this, canonical_goal_evaluation.state.unwrap().tree) {
|
||||
(
|
||||
DebugSolver::GoalEvaluation(goal_evaluation),
|
||||
DebugSolver::CanonicalGoalEvaluation(canonical_goal_evaluation),
|
||||
) => goal_evaluation.evaluation = Some(canonical_goal_evaluation),
|
||||
_ => unreachable!(),
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pub fn goal_evaluation_kind(&mut self, kind: WipCanonicalGoalEvaluationKind) {
|
||||
if let Some(this) = self.as_mut() {
|
||||
match this {
|
||||
DebugSolver::CanonicalGoalEvaluation(canonical_goal_evaluation) => {
|
||||
assert_eq!(canonical_goal_evaluation.kind.replace(kind), None);
|
||||
}
|
||||
_ => unreachable!(),
|
||||
};
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pub fn returned_goals(&mut self, goals: &[Goal<'tcx, ty::Predicate<'tcx>>]) {
|
||||
if let Some(this) = self.as_mut() {
|
||||
match this {
|
||||
DebugSolver::GoalEvaluation(evaluation) => {
|
||||
assert!(evaluation.returned_goals.is_empty());
|
||||
evaluation.returned_goals.extend(goals);
|
||||
}
|
||||
_ => unreachable!(),
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
pub fn goal_evaluation(&mut self, goal_evaluation: ProofTreeBuilder<'tcx>) {
|
||||
if let Some(this) = self.as_mut() {
|
||||
match (this, goal_evaluation.state.unwrap().tree) {
|
||||
(
|
||||
DebugSolver::AddedGoalsEvaluation(WipAddedGoalsEvaluation {
|
||||
evaluations, ..
|
||||
}),
|
||||
DebugSolver::GoalEvaluation(goal_evaluation),
|
||||
) => evaluations.last_mut().unwrap().push(goal_evaluation),
|
||||
(this @ DebugSolver::Root, goal_evaluation) => *this = goal_evaluation,
|
||||
_ => unreachable!(),
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pub fn new_goal_evaluation_step(
|
||||
&mut self,
|
||||
instantiated_goal: QueryInput<'tcx, ty::Predicate<'tcx>>,
|
||||
) -> ProofTreeBuilder<'tcx> {
|
||||
self.nested(|| WipGoalEvaluationStep {
|
||||
instantiated_goal,
|
||||
evaluation: WipProbe { steps: vec![], kind: None },
|
||||
})
|
||||
}
|
||||
pub fn goal_evaluation_step(&mut self, goal_evaluation_step: ProofTreeBuilder<'tcx>) {
|
||||
if let Some(this) = self.as_mut() {
|
||||
match (this, goal_evaluation_step.state.unwrap().tree) {
|
||||
(
|
||||
DebugSolver::CanonicalGoalEvaluation(canonical_goal_evaluations),
|
||||
DebugSolver::GoalEvaluationStep(goal_evaluation_step),
|
||||
) => {
|
||||
canonical_goal_evaluations.revisions.push(goal_evaluation_step);
|
||||
}
|
||||
_ => unreachable!(),
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pub fn new_probe(&mut self) -> ProofTreeBuilder<'tcx> {
|
||||
self.nested(|| WipProbe { steps: vec![], kind: None })
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pub fn probe_kind(&mut self, probe_kind: inspect::ProbeKind<'tcx>) {
|
||||
if let Some(this) = self.as_mut() {
|
||||
match this {
|
||||
DebugSolver::Probe(this) => {
|
||||
assert_eq!(this.kind.replace(probe_kind), None)
|
||||
}
|
||||
_ => unreachable!(),
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pub fn add_goal(ecx: &mut EvalCtxt<'_, 'tcx>, goal: Goal<'tcx, ty::Predicate<'tcx>>) {
|
||||
// Can't use `if let Some(this) = ecx.inspect.as_mut()` here because
|
||||
// we have to immutably use the `EvalCtxt` for `make_canonical_state`.
|
||||
if ecx.inspect.is_noop() {
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
let goal = Self::make_canonical_state(ecx, goal);
|
||||
|
||||
match ecx.inspect.as_mut().unwrap() {
|
||||
DebugSolver::GoalEvaluationStep(WipGoalEvaluationStep {
|
||||
evaluation: WipProbe { steps, .. },
|
||||
..
|
||||
})
|
||||
| DebugSolver::Probe(WipProbe { steps, .. }) => steps.push(WipProbeStep::AddGoal(goal)),
|
||||
s => unreachable!("tried to add {goal:?} to {s:?}"),
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pub fn finish_probe(&mut self, probe: ProofTreeBuilder<'tcx>) {
|
||||
if let Some(this) = self.as_mut() {
|
||||
match (this, probe.state.unwrap().tree) {
|
||||
(
|
||||
DebugSolver::Probe(WipProbe { steps, .. })
|
||||
| DebugSolver::GoalEvaluationStep(WipGoalEvaluationStep {
|
||||
evaluation: WipProbe { steps, .. },
|
||||
..
|
||||
}),
|
||||
DebugSolver::Probe(probe),
|
||||
) => steps.push(WipProbeStep::NestedProbe(probe)),
|
||||
_ => unreachable!(),
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pub fn new_evaluate_added_goals(&mut self) -> ProofTreeBuilder<'tcx> {
|
||||
self.nested(|| WipAddedGoalsEvaluation { evaluations: vec![], result: None })
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pub fn evaluate_added_goals_loop_start(&mut self) {
|
||||
if let Some(this) = self.as_mut() {
|
||||
match this {
|
||||
DebugSolver::AddedGoalsEvaluation(this) => {
|
||||
this.evaluations.push(vec![]);
|
||||
}
|
||||
_ => unreachable!(),
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pub fn eval_added_goals_result(&mut self, result: Result<Certainty, NoSolution>) {
|
||||
if let Some(this) = self.as_mut() {
|
||||
match this {
|
||||
DebugSolver::AddedGoalsEvaluation(this) => {
|
||||
assert_eq!(this.result.replace(result), None);
|
||||
}
|
||||
_ => unreachable!(),
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pub fn added_goals_evaluation(&mut self, added_goals_evaluation: ProofTreeBuilder<'tcx>) {
|
||||
if let Some(this) = self.as_mut() {
|
||||
match (this, added_goals_evaluation.state.unwrap().tree) {
|
||||
(
|
||||
DebugSolver::GoalEvaluationStep(WipGoalEvaluationStep {
|
||||
evaluation: WipProbe { steps, .. },
|
||||
..
|
||||
})
|
||||
| DebugSolver::Probe(WipProbe { steps, .. }),
|
||||
DebugSolver::AddedGoalsEvaluation(added_goals_evaluation),
|
||||
) => steps.push(WipProbeStep::EvaluateGoals(added_goals_evaluation)),
|
||||
_ => unreachable!(),
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pub fn query_result(&mut self, result: QueryResult<'tcx>) {
|
||||
if let Some(this) = self.as_mut() {
|
||||
match this {
|
||||
DebugSolver::CanonicalGoalEvaluation(canonical_goal_evaluation) => {
|
||||
assert_eq!(canonical_goal_evaluation.result.replace(result), None);
|
||||
}
|
||||
DebugSolver::GoalEvaluationStep(evaluation_step) => {
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
evaluation_step
|
||||
.evaluation
|
||||
.kind
|
||||
.replace(inspect::ProbeKind::Root { result }),
|
||||
None
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
_ => unreachable!(),
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue