Fix test
This commit is contained in:
parent
afcf9b262d
commit
dc613c6d05
1 changed files with 25 additions and 22 deletions
|
@ -32,13 +32,15 @@ use syntax::print::pprust;
|
|||
use syntax::ptr::P;
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
fn parse_expr(ps: &ParseSess, src: &str) -> P<Expr> {
|
||||
fn parse_expr(ps: &ParseSess, src: &str) -> Option<P<Expr>> {
|
||||
let src_as_string = src.to_string();
|
||||
|
||||
let mut p = parse::new_parser_from_source_str(ps,
|
||||
FileName::Custom(src_as_string.clone()),
|
||||
src_as_string);
|
||||
p.parse_expr().unwrap()
|
||||
let mut p = parse::new_parser_from_source_str(
|
||||
ps,
|
||||
FileName::Custom(src_as_string.clone()),
|
||||
src_as_string,
|
||||
);
|
||||
p.parse_expr().map_err(|mut e| e.cancel()).ok()
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -209,22 +211,23 @@ fn run() {
|
|||
let printed = pprust::expr_to_string(&e);
|
||||
println!("printed: {}", printed);
|
||||
|
||||
let mut parsed = parse_expr(&ps, &printed);
|
||||
|
||||
// We want to know if `parsed` is structurally identical to `e`, ignoring trivial
|
||||
// differences like placement of `Paren`s or the exact ranges of node spans.
|
||||
// Unfortunately, there is no easy way to make this comparison. Instead, we add `Paren`s
|
||||
// everywhere we can, then pretty-print. This should give an unambiguous representation of
|
||||
// each `Expr`, and it bypasses nearly all of the parenthesization logic, so we aren't
|
||||
// relying on the correctness of the very thing we're testing.
|
||||
RemoveParens.visit_expr(&mut e);
|
||||
AddParens.visit_expr(&mut e);
|
||||
let text1 = pprust::expr_to_string(&e);
|
||||
RemoveParens.visit_expr(&mut parsed);
|
||||
AddParens.visit_expr(&mut parsed);
|
||||
let text2 = pprust::expr_to_string(&parsed);
|
||||
assert!(text1 == text2,
|
||||
"exprs are not equal:\n e = {:?}\n parsed = {:?}",
|
||||
text1, text2);
|
||||
// Ignore expressions with chained comparisons that fail to parse
|
||||
if let Some(mut parsed) = parse_expr(&ps, &printed) {
|
||||
// We want to know if `parsed` is structurally identical to `e`, ignoring trivial
|
||||
// differences like placement of `Paren`s or the exact ranges of node spans.
|
||||
// Unfortunately, there is no easy way to make this comparison. Instead, we add `Paren`s
|
||||
// everywhere we can, then pretty-print. This should give an unambiguous representation
|
||||
// of each `Expr`, and it bypasses nearly all of the parenthesization logic, so we
|
||||
// aren't relying on the correctness of the very thing we're testing.
|
||||
RemoveParens.visit_expr(&mut e);
|
||||
AddParens.visit_expr(&mut e);
|
||||
let text1 = pprust::expr_to_string(&e);
|
||||
RemoveParens.visit_expr(&mut parsed);
|
||||
AddParens.visit_expr(&mut parsed);
|
||||
let text2 = pprust::expr_to_string(&parsed);
|
||||
assert!(text1 == text2,
|
||||
"exprs are not equal:\n e = {:?}\n parsed = {:?}",
|
||||
text1, text2);
|
||||
}
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue