rename evaluate_obligation_recursively

It does not, in fact, execute in a recursive context.

src/librustc/traits/query/evaluate_obligation.rs

@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ impl<'cx, 'gcx, 'tcx> InferCtxt<'cx, 'gcx, 'tcx> {
             Err(OverflowError) => {
                 let mut selcx =
                     SelectionContext::with_query_mode(&self, TraitQueryMode::Standard);
-                selcx.evaluate_obligation_recursively(obligation)
+                selcx.evaluate_root_obligation(obligation)
                     .unwrap_or_else(|r| {
                         span_bug!(
                             obligation.cause.span,

src/librustc/traits/select.rs

@@ -649,14 +649,15 @@ impl<'cx, 'gcx, 'tcx> SelectionContext<'cx, 'gcx, 'tcx> {
         // where we do not expect overflow to be propagated.
         assert!(self.query_mode == TraitQueryMode::Standard);
 
-        self.evaluate_obligation_recursively(obligation)
+        self.evaluate_root_obligation(obligation)
             .expect("Overflow should be caught earlier in standard query mode")
             .may_apply()
     }
 
-    /// Evaluates whether the obligation `obligation` can be satisfied and returns
+    /// Evaluates whether the obligation `obligation` can be satisfied
-    /// an `EvaluationResult`.
+    /// and returns an `EvaluationResult`. This is meant for the
-    pub fn evaluate_obligation_recursively(
+    /// *initial* call.
+    pub fn evaluate_root_obligation(
         &mut self,
         obligation: &PredicateObligation<'tcx>,
     ) -> Result<EvaluationResult, OverflowError> {

src/librustc_traits/evaluate_obligation.rs

@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ fn evaluate_obligation<'tcx>(
             let mut selcx = SelectionContext::with_query_mode(&infcx, TraitQueryMode::Canonical);
             let obligation = Obligation::new(ObligationCause::dummy(), param_env, predicate);
 
-            selcx.evaluate_obligation_recursively(&obligation)
+            selcx.evaluate_root_obligation(&obligation)
         },
     )
 }