Use ObligationCtxt in favor of TraitEngine in many places

This commit is contained in:
Michael Goulet 2024-05-01 17:22:39 -04:00
parent 79734f1db8
commit d9eb5232b6
9 changed files with 142 additions and 113 deletions

View file

@ -1,8 +1,9 @@
use crate::traits::query::evaluate_obligation::InferCtxtExt as _;
use crate::traits::{self, ObligationCtxt, SelectionContext, TraitEngineExt as _};
use crate::traits::{self, ObligationCtxt, SelectionContext};
use rustc_hir::def_id::DefId;
use rustc_hir::lang_items::LangItem;
use rustc_infer::traits::{Obligation, TraitEngine, TraitEngineExt as _};
use rustc_infer::traits::Obligation;
use rustc_macros::extension;
use rustc_middle::arena::ArenaAllocatable;
use rustc_middle::infer::canonical::{Canonical, CanonicalQueryResponse, QueryResponse};
@ -93,9 +94,9 @@ impl<'tcx> InferCtxt<'tcx> {
ty::TraitRef::new(self.tcx, trait_def_id, [ty]),
)) {
Ok(Some(selection)) => {
let mut fulfill_cx = <dyn TraitEngine<'tcx>>::new(self);
fulfill_cx.register_predicate_obligations(self, selection.nested_obligations());
Some(fulfill_cx.select_all_or_error(self))
let ocx = ObligationCtxt::new(self);
ocx.register_obligations(selection.nested_obligations());
Some(ocx.select_all_or_error())
}
Ok(None) | Err(_) => None,
}

View file

@ -14,7 +14,6 @@ use rustc_ast_ir::visit::VisitorResult;
use rustc_infer::infer::resolve::EagerResolver;
use rustc_infer::infer::type_variable::TypeVariableOrigin;
use rustc_infer::infer::{DefineOpaqueTypes, InferCtxt, InferOk};
use rustc_infer::traits::{TraitEngine, TraitEngineExt};
use rustc_macros::extension;
use rustc_middle::infer::unify_key::ConstVariableOrigin;
use rustc_middle::traits::query::NoSolution;
@ -26,9 +25,9 @@ use rustc_middle::ty::TypeFoldable;
use rustc_span::{Span, DUMMY_SP};
use crate::solve::eval_ctxt::canonical;
use crate::solve::FulfillmentCtxt;
use crate::solve::{EvalCtxt, GoalEvaluationKind, GoalSource};
use crate::solve::{GenerateProofTree, InferCtxtEvalExt};
use crate::traits::ObligationCtxt;
pub struct InspectConfig {
pub max_depth: usize,
@ -74,14 +73,13 @@ impl<'tcx> NormalizesToTermHack<'tcx> {
.eq(DefineOpaqueTypes::Yes, self.term, self.unconstrained_term)
.map_err(|_| NoSolution)
.and_then(|InferOk { value: (), obligations }| {
let mut fulfill_cx = FulfillmentCtxt::new(infcx);
fulfill_cx.register_predicate_obligations(infcx, obligations);
if fulfill_cx.select_where_possible(infcx).is_empty() {
if fulfill_cx.pending_obligations().is_empty() {
Ok(Certainty::Yes)
} else {
Ok(Certainty::AMBIGUOUS)
}
let ocx = ObligationCtxt::new(infcx);
ocx.register_obligations(obligations);
let errors = ocx.select_all_or_error();
if errors.is_empty() {
Ok(Certainty::Yes)
} else if errors.iter().all(|e| !e.is_true_error()) {
Ok(Certainty::AMBIGUOUS)
} else {
Err(NoSolution)
}

View file

@ -6,12 +6,9 @@
use crate::infer::outlives::env::OutlivesEnvironment;
use crate::infer::InferOk;
use crate::regions::InferCtxtRegionExt;
use crate::solve::inspect::{InspectGoal, ProofTreeInferCtxtExt, ProofTreeVisitor};
use crate::solve::{deeply_normalize_for_diagnostics, inspect, FulfillmentCtxt};
use crate::traits::engine::TraitEngineExt as _;
use crate::solve::{deeply_normalize_for_diagnostics, inspect};
use crate::traits::select::IntercrateAmbiguityCause;
use crate::traits::structural_normalize::StructurallyNormalizeExt;
use crate::traits::NormalizeExt;
use crate::traits::SkipLeakCheck;
use crate::traits::{
@ -22,7 +19,7 @@ use rustc_errors::{Diag, EmissionGuarantee};
use rustc_hir::def::DefKind;
use rustc_hir::def_id::DefId;
use rustc_infer::infer::{DefineOpaqueTypes, InferCtxt, TyCtxtInferExt};
use rustc_infer::traits::{util, FulfillmentErrorCode, TraitEngine, TraitEngineExt};
use rustc_infer::traits::{util, FulfillmentErrorCode};
use rustc_middle::traits::query::NoSolution;
use rustc_middle::traits::solve::{CandidateSource, Certainty, Goal};
use rustc_middle::traits::specialization_graph::OverlapMode;
@ -35,6 +32,7 @@ use std::fmt::Debug;
use std::ops::ControlFlow;
use super::error_reporting::suggest_new_overflow_limit;
use super::ObligationCtxt;
/// Whether we do the orphan check relative to this crate or to some remote crate.
#[derive(Copy, Clone, Debug)]
@ -361,23 +359,27 @@ fn impl_intersection_has_impossible_obligation<'a, 'cx, 'tcx>(
let infcx = selcx.infcx;
if infcx.next_trait_solver() {
let mut fulfill_cx = FulfillmentCtxt::new(infcx);
fulfill_cx.register_predicate_obligations(infcx, obligations.iter().cloned());
let ocx = ObligationCtxt::new(infcx);
ocx.register_obligations(obligations.iter().cloned());
let errors_and_ambiguities = ocx.select_all_or_error();
// We only care about the obligations that are *definitely* true errors.
// Ambiguities do not prove the disjointness of two impls.
let errors = fulfill_cx.select_where_possible(infcx);
let (errors, ambiguities): (Vec<_>, Vec<_>) =
errors_and_ambiguities.into_iter().partition(|error| error.is_true_error());
if errors.is_empty() {
let overflow_errors = fulfill_cx.collect_remaining_errors(infcx);
let overflowing_predicates = overflow_errors
.into_iter()
.filter(|e| match e.code {
FulfillmentErrorCode::Ambiguity { overflow: Some(true) } => true,
_ => false,
})
.map(|e| infcx.resolve_vars_if_possible(e.obligation.predicate))
.collect();
IntersectionHasImpossibleObligations::No { overflowing_predicates }
IntersectionHasImpossibleObligations::No {
overflowing_predicates: ambiguities
.into_iter()
.filter(|error| {
matches!(
error.code,
FulfillmentErrorCode::Ambiguity { overflow: Some(true) }
)
})
.map(|e| infcx.resolve_vars_if_possible(e.obligation.predicate))
.collect(),
}
} else {
IntersectionHasImpossibleObligations::Yes
}
@ -589,13 +591,14 @@ fn try_prove_negated_where_clause<'tcx>(
// Without this, we over-eagerly register coherence ambiguity candidates when
// impl candidates do exist.
let ref infcx = root_infcx.fork_with_intercrate(false);
let mut fulfill_cx = FulfillmentCtxt::new(infcx);
fulfill_cx.register_predicate_obligation(
infcx,
Obligation::new(infcx.tcx, ObligationCause::dummy(), param_env, negative_predicate),
);
if !fulfill_cx.select_all_or_error(infcx).is_empty() {
let ocx = ObligationCtxt::new(infcx);
ocx.register_obligation(Obligation::new(
infcx.tcx,
ObligationCause::dummy(),
param_env,
negative_predicate,
));
if !ocx.select_all_or_error().is_empty() {
return false;
}
@ -603,8 +606,7 @@ fn try_prove_negated_where_clause<'tcx>(
// if that wasn't implemented just for LocalDefId, and we'd need to do
// the normalization ourselves since this is totally fallible...
let outlives_env = OutlivesEnvironment::new(param_env);
let errors = infcx.resolve_regions(&outlives_env);
let errors = ocx.resolve_regions(&outlives_env);
if !errors.is_empty() {
return false;
}
@ -1129,22 +1131,17 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> ProofTreeVisitor<'tcx> for AmbiguityCausesVisitor<'a, 'tcx> {
result: Ok(_),
} = cand.kind()
{
let lazily_normalize_ty = |ty: Ty<'tcx>| {
let mut fulfill_cx = <dyn TraitEngine<'tcx>>::new(infcx);
let lazily_normalize_ty = |mut ty: Ty<'tcx>| {
if matches!(ty.kind(), ty::Alias(..)) {
// FIXME(-Znext-solver=coherence): we currently don't
// normalize opaque types here, resulting in diverging behavior
// for TAITs.
match infcx
.at(&ObligationCause::dummy(), param_env)
.structurally_normalize(ty, &mut *fulfill_cx)
{
Ok(ty) => Ok(ty),
Err(_errs) => Err(()),
let ocx = ObligationCtxt::new(infcx);
ty = ocx
.structurally_normalize(&ObligationCause::dummy(), param_env, ty)
.map_err(|_| ())?;
if !ocx.select_where_possible().is_empty() {
return Err(());
}
} else {
Ok(ty)
}
Ok(ty)
};
infcx.probe(|_| {

View file

@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ use crate::regions::InferCtxtRegionExt;
use crate::solve::FulfillmentCtxt as NextFulfillmentCtxt;
use crate::traits::error_reporting::TypeErrCtxtExt;
use crate::traits::NormalizeExt;
use crate::traits::StructurallyNormalizeExt;
use rustc_data_structures::fx::FxIndexSet;
use rustc_errors::ErrorGuaranteed;
use rustc_hir::def_id::{DefId, LocalDefId};
@ -15,6 +16,7 @@ use rustc_infer::infer::canonical::{
Canonical, CanonicalQueryResponse, CanonicalVarValues, QueryResponse,
};
use rustc_infer::infer::outlives::env::OutlivesEnvironment;
use rustc_infer::infer::RegionResolutionError;
use rustc_infer::infer::{DefineOpaqueTypes, InferCtxt, InferOk};
use rustc_infer::traits::{
FulfillmentError, Obligation, ObligationCause, PredicateObligation, TraitEngineExt as _,
@ -117,6 +119,17 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> ObligationCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
self.infcx.at(cause, param_env).deeply_normalize(value, &mut **self.engine.borrow_mut())
}
pub fn structurally_normalize(
&self,
cause: &ObligationCause<'tcx>,
param_env: ty::ParamEnv<'tcx>,
value: Ty<'tcx>,
) -> Result<Ty<'tcx>, Vec<FulfillmentError<'tcx>>> {
self.infcx
.at(cause, param_env)
.structurally_normalize(value, &mut **self.engine.borrow_mut())
}
pub fn eq<T: ToTrace<'tcx>>(
&self,
cause: &ObligationCause<'tcx>,
@ -182,6 +195,11 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> ObligationCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
self.engine.borrow_mut().select_all_or_error(self.infcx)
}
#[must_use]
pub fn pending_obligations(&self) -> Vec<PredicateObligation<'tcx>> {
self.engine.borrow().pending_obligations()
}
/// Resolves regions and reports errors.
///
/// Takes ownership of the context as doing trait solving afterwards
@ -199,6 +217,18 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> ObligationCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
}
}
/// Resolves regions and reports errors.
///
/// Takes ownership of the context as doing trait solving afterwards
/// will result in region constraints getting ignored.
#[must_use]
pub fn resolve_regions(
self,
outlives_env: &OutlivesEnvironment<'tcx>,
) -> Vec<RegionResolutionError<'tcx>> {
self.infcx.resolve_regions(outlives_env)
}
pub fn assumed_wf_types_and_report_errors(
&self,
param_env: ty::ParamEnv<'tcx>,

View file

@ -1,9 +1,10 @@
use rustc_infer::traits::{TraitEngine, TraitEngineExt};
use rustc_macros::extension;
use crate::infer::canonical::OriginalQueryValues;
use crate::infer::InferCtxt;
use crate::traits::{EvaluationResult, OverflowError, PredicateObligation, SelectionContext};
use crate::traits::{
EvaluationResult, ObligationCtxt, OverflowError, PredicateObligation, SelectionContext,
};
#[extension(pub trait InferCtxtExt<'tcx>)]
impl<'tcx> InferCtxt<'tcx> {
@ -67,21 +68,22 @@ impl<'tcx> InferCtxt<'tcx> {
if self.next_trait_solver() {
self.probe(|snapshot| {
let mut fulfill_cx = crate::solve::FulfillmentCtxt::new(self);
fulfill_cx.register_predicate_obligation(self, obligation.clone());
// True errors
// FIXME(-Znext-solver): Overflows are reported as ambig here, is that OK?
if !fulfill_cx.select_where_possible(self).is_empty() {
Ok(EvaluationResult::EvaluatedToErr)
} else if !fulfill_cx.select_all_or_error(self).is_empty() {
Ok(EvaluationResult::EvaluatedToAmbig)
} else if self.opaque_types_added_in_snapshot(snapshot) {
Ok(EvaluationResult::EvaluatedToOkModuloOpaqueTypes)
} else if self.region_constraints_added_in_snapshot(snapshot) {
Ok(EvaluationResult::EvaluatedToOkModuloRegions)
} else {
Ok(EvaluationResult::EvaluatedToOk)
let ocx = ObligationCtxt::new(self);
ocx.register_obligation(obligation.clone());
let mut result = EvaluationResult::EvaluatedToOk;
for error in ocx.select_all_or_error() {
if error.is_true_error() {
return Ok(EvaluationResult::EvaluatedToErr);
} else {
result = result.max(EvaluationResult::EvaluatedToAmbig);
}
}
if self.opaque_types_added_in_snapshot(snapshot) {
result = result.max(EvaluationResult::EvaluatedToOkModuloOpaqueTypes);
} else if self.region_constraints_added_in_snapshot(snapshot) {
result = result.max(EvaluationResult::EvaluatedToOkModuloRegions);
}
Ok(result)
})
} else {
assert!(!self.intercrate);