test that coercions still work under randomization
This commit is contained in:
parent
8b1de1682f
commit
d89b6d5ac6
1 changed files with 40 additions and 8 deletions
|
@ -1,18 +1,23 @@
|
|||
//@ build-pass
|
||||
//@ run-pass
|
||||
//@ revisions: normal randomize-layout
|
||||
//@ [randomize-layout]compile-flags: -Zrandomize-layout
|
||||
//@ [randomize-layout]compile-flags: -Zrandomize-layout -Zlayout-seed=2
|
||||
|
||||
#![crate_type = "lib"]
|
||||
#![feature(offset_of_enum)]
|
||||
|
||||
struct Foo<T>(u32, T, u8);
|
||||
use std::ptr;
|
||||
|
||||
struct Wrapper<T>(T);
|
||||
|
||||
// these types only have their field offsets taken, they're never constructed
|
||||
#[allow(dead_code)]
|
||||
pub struct Foo<T>(u32, T, u8);
|
||||
#[allow(dead_code)]
|
||||
pub struct Wrapper<T>(T);
|
||||
#[repr(transparent)]
|
||||
struct TransparentWrapper(u16);
|
||||
#[allow(dead_code)]
|
||||
pub struct TransparentWrapper(u16);
|
||||
|
||||
const _: () = {
|
||||
// behavior of the current implementation, not guaranteed
|
||||
// Behavior of the current non-randomized implementation, not guaranteed
|
||||
#[cfg(not(randomize_layout))]
|
||||
assert!(std::mem::offset_of!(Foo::<u16>, 1) == std::mem::offset_of!(Foo::<Wrapper<u16>>, 1));
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -21,10 +26,37 @@ const _: () = {
|
|||
assert!(std::mem::offset_of!(Foo::<u16>, 1) != std::mem::offset_of!(Foo::<Wrapper<u16>>, 1));
|
||||
|
||||
// Even transparent wrapper inner types get a different layout since associated type
|
||||
// pecialization could result in the outer type behaving differently depending on the exact
|
||||
// specialization could result in the outer type behaving differently depending on the exact
|
||||
// inner type.
|
||||
#[cfg(randomize_layout)]
|
||||
assert!(
|
||||
std::mem::offset_of!(Foo::<u16>, 1) != std::mem::offset_of!(Foo::<TransparentWrapper>, 1)
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
// Currently all fn pointers are treated interchangably even with randomization. Not guaranteed.
|
||||
// Associated type specialization could also break this.
|
||||
assert!(
|
||||
std::mem::offset_of!(Foo::<fn(u32)>, 1) == std::mem::offset_of!(Foo::<fn() -> usize>, 1)
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
// But subtype coercions must always result in the same layout.
|
||||
assert!(
|
||||
std::mem::offset_of!(Foo::<fn(&u32)>, 1) == std::mem::offset_of!(Foo::<fn(&'static u32)>, 1)
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
// Randomization must uphold NPO guarantees
|
||||
assert!(std::mem::offset_of!(Option::<&usize>, Some.0) == 0);
|
||||
assert!(std::mem::offset_of!(Result::<&usize, ()>, Ok.0) == 0);
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
#[allow(dead_code)]
|
||||
struct Unsizable<T: ?Sized>(usize, T);
|
||||
|
||||
fn main() {
|
||||
// offset_of doesn't let us probe the unsized field, check at runtime.
|
||||
let x = &Unsizable::<[u32; 4]>(0, [0; 4]);
|
||||
let y: &Unsizable::<[u32]> = x;
|
||||
|
||||
// type coercion must not change the layout.
|
||||
assert_eq!(ptr::from_ref(&x.1).addr(), ptr::from_ref(&y.1).addr());
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue