Rollup merge of #100897 - RalfJung:const-not-to-mutable, r=lcnr

extra sanity check against consts pointing to mutable memory

This should be both unreachable and redundant (since we already ensure that validation only reads from read-only memory, when validating consts), but I feel like we cannot be paranoid enough here, and also if this ever fails it'll be a nicer error than the "cannot read from mutable memory" error.
This commit is contained in:
Matthias Krüger 2022-08-29 06:34:46 +02:00 committed by GitHub
commit d814fdd3f9
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23
7 changed files with 55 additions and 37 deletions

View file

@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ use std::convert::TryFrom;
use std::fmt::Write;
use std::num::NonZeroUsize;
use rustc_ast::Mutability;
use rustc_data_structures::fx::FxHashSet;
use rustc_hir as hir;
use rustc_middle::mir::interpret::InterpError;
@ -423,34 +424,51 @@ impl<'rt, 'mir, 'tcx: 'mir, M: Machine<'mir, 'tcx>> ValidityVisitor<'rt, 'mir, '
// Proceed recursively even for ZST, no reason to skip them!
// `!` is a ZST and we want to validate it.
if let Ok((alloc_id, _offset, _prov)) = self.ecx.ptr_try_get_alloc_id(place.ptr) {
// Special handling for pointers to statics (irrespective of their type).
// Let's see what kind of memory this points to.
let alloc_kind = self.ecx.tcx.try_get_global_alloc(alloc_id);
if let Some(GlobalAlloc::Static(did)) = alloc_kind {
assert!(!self.ecx.tcx.is_thread_local_static(did));
assert!(self.ecx.tcx.is_static(did));
if matches!(
self.ctfe_mode,
Some(CtfeValidationMode::Const { allow_static_ptrs: false, .. })
) {
// See const_eval::machine::MemoryExtra::can_access_statics for why
// this check is so important.
// This check is reachable when the const just referenced the static,
// but never read it (so we never entered `before_access_global`).
throw_validation_failure!(self.path,
{ "a {} pointing to a static variable", kind }
);
match alloc_kind {
Some(GlobalAlloc::Static(did)) => {
// Special handling for pointers to statics (irrespective of their type).
assert!(!self.ecx.tcx.is_thread_local_static(did));
assert!(self.ecx.tcx.is_static(did));
if matches!(
self.ctfe_mode,
Some(CtfeValidationMode::Const { allow_static_ptrs: false, .. })
) {
// See const_eval::machine::MemoryExtra::can_access_statics for why
// this check is so important.
// This check is reachable when the const just referenced the static,
// but never read it (so we never entered `before_access_global`).
throw_validation_failure!(self.path,
{ "a {} pointing to a static variable in a constant", kind }
);
}
// We skip recursively checking other statics. These statics must be sound by
// themselves, and the only way to get broken statics here is by using
// unsafe code.
// The reasons we don't check other statics is twofold. For one, in all
// sound cases, the static was already validated on its own, and second, we
// trigger cycle errors if we try to compute the value of the other static
// and that static refers back to us.
// We might miss const-invalid data,
// but things are still sound otherwise (in particular re: consts
// referring to statics).
return Ok(());
}
// We skip checking other statics. These statics must be sound by
// themselves, and the only way to get broken statics here is by using
// unsafe code.
// The reasons we don't check other statics is twofold. For one, in all
// sound cases, the static was already validated on its own, and second, we
// trigger cycle errors if we try to compute the value of the other static
// and that static refers back to us.
// We might miss const-invalid data,
// but things are still sound otherwise (in particular re: consts
// referring to statics).
return Ok(());
Some(GlobalAlloc::Memory(alloc)) => {
if alloc.inner().mutability == Mutability::Mut
&& matches!(self.ctfe_mode, Some(CtfeValidationMode::Const { .. }))
{
// This should be unreachable, but if someone manages to copy a pointer
// out of a `static`, then that pointer might point to mutable memory,
// and we would catch that here.
throw_validation_failure!(self.path,
{ "a {} pointing to mutable memory in a constant", kind }
);
}
}
// Nothing to check for these.
None | Some(GlobalAlloc::Function(..) | GlobalAlloc::VTable(..)) => {}
}
}
let path = &self.path;
@ -528,7 +546,7 @@ impl<'rt, 'mir, 'tcx: 'mir, M: Machine<'mir, 'tcx>> ValidityVisitor<'rt, 'mir, '
}
ty::Ref(_, ty, mutbl) => {
if matches!(self.ctfe_mode, Some(CtfeValidationMode::Const { .. }))
&& *mutbl == hir::Mutability::Mut
&& *mutbl == Mutability::Mut
{
// A mutable reference inside a const? That does not seem right (except if it is
// a ZST).