1
Fork 0

Clean up and improve some docs

* compiler docs
  * Don't format list as part of a code block
  * Clean up some other formatting
* rustdoc book
  * Update CommonMark spec version to latest (0.28 -> 0.29)
  * Clean up some various wording and formatting
This commit is contained in:
Camelid 2020-10-18 21:54:10 -07:00
parent b1496c6e60
commit d725da129e
3 changed files with 58 additions and 32 deletions

View file

@ -78,20 +78,26 @@
//! new pattern `p`.
//!
//! For example, say we have the following:
//!
//! ```
//! // x: (Option<bool>, Result<()>)
//! match x {
//! (Some(true), _) => {}
//! (None, Err(())) => {}
//! (None, Err(_)) => {}
//! }
//! // x: (Option<bool>, Result<()>)
//! match x {
//! (Some(true), _) => {}
//! (None, Err(())) => {}
//! (None, Err(_)) => {}
//! }
//! ```
//!
//! Here, the matrix `P` starts as:
//!
//! ```
//! [
//! [(Some(true), _)],
//! [(None, Err(()))],
//! [(None, Err(_))],
//! ]
//! ```
//!
//! We can tell it's not exhaustive, because `U(P, _)` is true (we're not covering
//! `[(Some(false), _)]`, for instance). In addition, row 3 is not useful, because
//! all the values it covers are already covered by row 2.
@ -178,10 +184,14 @@
//! This special case is handled in `is_useful_specialized`.
//!
//! For example, if `P` is:
//!
//! ```
//! [
//! [Some(true), _],
//! [None, 0],
//! [Some(true), _],
//! [None, 0],
//! ]
//! ```
//!
//! and `p` is [Some(false), 0], then we don't care about row 2 since we know `p` only
//! matches values that row 2 doesn't. For row 1 however, we need to dig into the
//! arguments of `Some` to know whether some new value is covered. So we compute
@ -198,10 +208,14 @@
//! `U(P, p) := U(D(P), D(p))`
//!
//! For example, if `P` is:
//!
//! ```
//! [
//! [_, true, _],
//! [None, false, 1],
//! ]
//! ```
//!
//! and `p` is [_, false, _], the `Some` constructor doesn't appear in `P`. So if we
//! only had row 2, we'd know that `p` is useful. However row 1 starts with a
//! wildcard, so we need to check whether `U([[true, _]], [false, 1])`.
@ -215,10 +229,14 @@
//! `U(P, p) := ∃(k ϵ constructors) U(S(k, P), S(k, p))`
//!
//! For example, if `P` is:
//!
//! ```
//! [
//! [Some(true), _],
//! [None, false],
//! ]
//! ```
//!
//! and `p` is [_, false], both `None` and `Some` constructors appear in the first
//! components of `P`. We will therefore try popping both constructors in turn: we
//! compute `U([[true, _]], [_, false])` for the `Some` constructor, and `U([[false]],
@ -1496,6 +1514,7 @@ struct PatCtxt<'tcx> {
/// multiple patterns.
///
/// For example, if we are constructing a witness for the match against
///
/// ```
/// struct Pair(Option<(u32, u32)>, bool);
///
@ -1619,12 +1638,14 @@ fn all_constructors<'a, 'tcx>(
// actually match against them all themselves. So we always return only the fictitious
// constructor.
// E.g., in an example like:
//
// ```
// let err: io::ErrorKind = ...;
// match err {
// io::ErrorKind::NotFound => {},
// }
// ```
//
// we don't want to show every possible IO error, but instead have only `_` as the
// witness.
let is_declared_nonexhaustive = cx.is_foreign_non_exhaustive_enum(pcx.ty);
@ -2017,6 +2038,7 @@ crate fn is_useful<'p, 'tcx>(
let mut unreachable_branches = Vec::new();
// Subpatterns that are unreachable from all branches. E.g. in the following case, the last
// `true` is unreachable only from one branch, so it is overall reachable.
//
// ```
// match (true, true) {
// (true, true) => {}
@ -2161,10 +2183,12 @@ crate fn is_useful<'p, 'tcx>(
// to do this and instead report a single `_` witness:
// if the user didn't actually specify a constructor
// in this arm, e.g., in
//
// ```
// let x: (Direction, Direction, bool) = ...;
// let (_, _, false) = x;
// ```
//
// we don't want to show all 16 possible witnesses
// `(<direction-1>, <direction-2>, true)` - we are
// satisfied with `(_, _, true)`. In this case,