Rollup merge of #98519 - TaKO8Ki:add-head-span-field-to-item-and-impl-item, r=cjgillot
Replace some `guess_head_span` with `def_span` This patch fixes a part of #97417. r? `@cjgillot`
This commit is contained in:
commit
d712f67897
40 changed files with 154 additions and 223 deletions
|
@ -340,10 +340,7 @@ fn report_negative_positive_conflict(
|
|||
positive_impl_def_id: DefId,
|
||||
sg: &mut specialization_graph::Graph,
|
||||
) {
|
||||
let impl_span = tcx
|
||||
.sess
|
||||
.source_map()
|
||||
.guess_head_span(tcx.span_of_impl(local_impl_def_id.to_def_id()).unwrap());
|
||||
let impl_span = tcx.def_span(local_impl_def_id);
|
||||
|
||||
let mut err = struct_span_err!(
|
||||
tcx.sess,
|
||||
|
@ -356,10 +353,7 @@ fn report_negative_positive_conflict(
|
|||
|
||||
match tcx.span_of_impl(negative_impl_def_id) {
|
||||
Ok(span) => {
|
||||
err.span_label(
|
||||
tcx.sess.source_map().guess_head_span(span),
|
||||
"negative implementation here".to_string(),
|
||||
);
|
||||
err.span_label(span, "negative implementation here");
|
||||
}
|
||||
Err(cname) => {
|
||||
err.note(&format!("negative implementation in crate `{}`", cname));
|
||||
|
@ -368,10 +362,7 @@ fn report_negative_positive_conflict(
|
|||
|
||||
match tcx.span_of_impl(positive_impl_def_id) {
|
||||
Ok(span) => {
|
||||
err.span_label(
|
||||
tcx.sess.source_map().guess_head_span(span),
|
||||
"positive implementation here".to_string(),
|
||||
);
|
||||
err.span_label(span, "positive implementation here");
|
||||
}
|
||||
Err(cname) => {
|
||||
err.note(&format!("positive implementation in crate `{}`", cname));
|
||||
|
@ -388,8 +379,7 @@ fn report_conflicting_impls(
|
|||
used_to_be_allowed: Option<FutureCompatOverlapErrorKind>,
|
||||
sg: &mut specialization_graph::Graph,
|
||||
) {
|
||||
let impl_span =
|
||||
tcx.sess.source_map().guess_head_span(tcx.span_of_impl(impl_def_id.to_def_id()).unwrap());
|
||||
let impl_span = tcx.def_span(impl_def_id);
|
||||
|
||||
// Work to be done after we've built the DiagnosticBuilder. We have to define it
|
||||
// now because the struct_lint methods don't return back the DiagnosticBuilder
|
||||
|
@ -416,10 +406,7 @@ fn report_conflicting_impls(
|
|||
let mut err = err.build(&msg);
|
||||
match tcx.span_of_impl(overlap.with_impl) {
|
||||
Ok(span) => {
|
||||
err.span_label(
|
||||
tcx.sess.source_map().guess_head_span(span),
|
||||
"first implementation here".to_string(),
|
||||
);
|
||||
err.span_label(span, "first implementation here".to_string());
|
||||
|
||||
err.span_label(
|
||||
impl_span,
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue