Fix another assertion failure for some Expect diagnostics.
Very similar to #126719. So much so that I added a new case to the test from that PR rather than creating a new one.
This commit is contained in:
parent
a9c8887c7d
commit
d6efcbb760
3 changed files with 28 additions and 6 deletions
|
@ -1456,10 +1456,10 @@ impl DiagCtxtInner {
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if diagnostic.has_future_breakage() {
|
if diagnostic.has_future_breakage() {
|
||||||
// Future breakages aren't emitted if they're `Level::Allow`,
|
// Future breakages aren't emitted if they're `Level::Allow` or
|
||||||
// but they still need to be constructed and stashed below,
|
// `Level::Expect`, but they still need to be constructed and
|
||||||
// so they'll trigger the must_produce_diag check.
|
// stashed below, so they'll trigger the must_produce_diag check.
|
||||||
assert!(matches!(diagnostic.level, Error | Warning | Allow));
|
assert!(matches!(diagnostic.level, Error | Warning | Allow | Expect(_)));
|
||||||
self.future_breakage_diagnostics.push(diagnostic.clone());
|
self.future_breakage_diagnostics.push(diagnostic.clone());
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -1,11 +1,23 @@
|
||||||
|
// This test covers similar crashes from both #126521 and #126751.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
macro_rules! foo {
|
macro_rules! foo {
|
||||||
($val:ident) => {
|
($val:ident) => {
|
||||||
true;
|
true;
|
||||||
};
|
};
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
macro_rules! bar {
|
||||||
|
($val:ident) => {
|
||||||
|
(5_i32.overflowing_sub(3));
|
||||||
|
};
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
fn main() {
|
fn main() {
|
||||||
#[expect(semicolon_in_expressions_from_macros)]
|
#[expect(semicolon_in_expressions_from_macros)]
|
||||||
//~^ ERROR the `#[expect]` attribute is an experimental feature
|
//~^ ERROR the `#[expect]` attribute is an experimental feature
|
||||||
let _ = foo!(x);
|
let _ = foo!(x);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
#[expect(semicolon_in_expressions_from_macros)]
|
||||||
|
//~^ ERROR the `#[expect]` attribute is an experimental feature
|
||||||
|
let _ = bar!(x);
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
|
||||||
error[E0658]: the `#[expect]` attribute is an experimental feature
|
error[E0658]: the `#[expect]` attribute is an experimental feature
|
||||||
--> $DIR/expect-future_breakage-crash-issue-126521.rs:8:5
|
--> $DIR/expect-future_breakage-crash-issue-126521.rs:16:5
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||
LL | #[expect(semicolon_in_expressions_from_macros)]
|
LL | #[expect(semicolon_in_expressions_from_macros)]
|
||||||
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||||
|
@ -8,6 +8,16 @@ LL | #[expect(semicolon_in_expressions_from_macros)]
|
||||||
= help: add `#![feature(lint_reasons)]` to the crate attributes to enable
|
= help: add `#![feature(lint_reasons)]` to the crate attributes to enable
|
||||||
= note: this compiler was built on YYYY-MM-DD; consider upgrading it if it is out of date
|
= note: this compiler was built on YYYY-MM-DD; consider upgrading it if it is out of date
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
error: aborting due to 1 previous error
|
error[E0658]: the `#[expect]` attribute is an experimental feature
|
||||||
|
--> $DIR/expect-future_breakage-crash-issue-126521.rs:20:5
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
LL | #[expect(semicolon_in_expressions_from_macros)]
|
||||||
|
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
= note: see issue #54503 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/54503> for more information
|
||||||
|
= help: add `#![feature(lint_reasons)]` to the crate attributes to enable
|
||||||
|
= note: this compiler was built on YYYY-MM-DD; consider upgrading it if it is out of date
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
error: aborting due to 2 previous errors
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0658`.
|
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0658`.
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue