bjoernager/rust
bjoernager/rust
1
Fork 0
Code Activity

Extend proc_macro_back_compat lint to procedural-masquerade

Browse source 
We now lint on *any* use of `procedural-masquerade` crate. While this
crate still exists, its main reverse dependency (`cssparser`) no longer
depends on it. Any crates still depending off should stop doing so, as
it only exists to support very old Rust versions.

If a crate actually needs to support old versions of rustc via
`procedural-masquerade`, then they'll just need to accept the warning
until we remove it entirely (at the same time as the back-compat hack).
The latest version of `procedural-masquerade` does not work with the
latest rustc, but trying to check for the version seems like more
trouble than it's worth.

While working on this, I realized that the `proc-macro-hack` check was
never actually doing anything. The corresponding enum variant in
`proc-macro-hack` is named `Value` or `Nested` - it has never been
called `Input`. Due to a strange Crater issue, the Crater run that
tested adding this did *not* end up testing it - some of the crates that
would have failed did not actually have their tests checked, making it
seem as though the `proc-macro-hack` check was working.

The Crater issue is being discussed at
230406661

Despite the `proc-macro-hack` check not actually doing anything, we
haven't gotten any reports from users about their build being broken.
I went ahead and removed it entirely, since it's clear that no one is
being affected by the `proc-macro-hack` regression in practice.
This commit is contained in:
Aaron Hill 2021-03-15 15:54:25 -04:00
parent 2ccf06302c
commit d6a7c1d47f
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: B4087E510E98B164
7 changed files with 103 additions and 29 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

27
compiler/rustc_ast/src/token.rs
View file

@ -784,33 +784,6 @@ impl Nonterminal {
NtTT(tt) => tt.span(),
}
}
/// This nonterminal looks like some specific enums from
/// `proc-macro-hack` and `procedural-masquerade` crates.
/// We need to maintain some special pretty-printing behavior for them due to incorrect
/// asserts in old versions of those crates and their wide use in the ecosystem.
/// See issue #73345 for more details.
/// FIXME(#73933): Remove this eventually.
pub fn pretty_printing_compatibility_hack(&self) -> bool {
let item = match self {
NtItem(item) => item,
NtStmt(stmt) => match &stmt.kind {
ast::StmtKind::Item(item) => item,
_ => return false,
},
_ => return false,
};
let name = item.ident.name;
if name == sym::ProceduralMasqueradeDummyType || name == sym::ProcMacroHack {
if let ast::ItemKind::Enum(enum_def, _) = &item.kind {
if let [variant] = &*enum_def.variants {
return variant.ident.name == sym::Input;
}
}
}
false
}
}
impl PartialEq for Nonterminal {