1
Fork 0

Auto merge of #93368 - eddyb:diagbld-guarantee, r=estebank

rustc_errors: let `DiagnosticBuilder::emit` return a "guarantee of emission".

That is, `DiagnosticBuilder` is now generic over the return type of `.emit()`, so we'll now have:
* `DiagnosticBuilder<ErrorReported>` for error (incl. fatal/bug) diagnostics
  * can only be created via a `const L: Level`-generic constructor, that limits allowed variants via a `where` clause, so not even `rustc_errors` can accidentally bypass this limitation
  * asserts `diagnostic.is_error()` on emission, just in case the construction restriction was bypassed (e.g. by replacing the whole `Diagnostic` inside `DiagnosticBuilder`)
  * `.emit()` returns `ErrorReported`, as a "proof" token that `.emit()` was called
    (though note that this isn't a real guarantee until after completing the work on
     #69426)
* `DiagnosticBuilder<()>` for everything else (warnings, notes, etc.)
  * can also be obtained from other `DiagnosticBuilder`s by calling `.forget_guarantee()`

This PR is a companion to other ongoing work, namely:
* #69426
  and it's ongoing implementation:
  #93222
  the API changes in this PR are needed to get statically-checked "only errors produce `ErrorReported` from `.emit()`", but doesn't itself provide any really strong guarantees without those other `ErrorReported` changes
* #93244
  would make the choices of API changes (esp. naming) in this PR fit better overall

In order to be able to let `.emit()` return anything trustable, several changes had to be made:
* `Diagnostic`'s `level` field is now private to `rustc_errors`, to disallow arbitrary "downgrade"s from "some kind of error" to "warning" (or anything else that doesn't cause compilation to fail)
  * it's still possible to replace the whole `Diagnostic` inside the `DiagnosticBuilder`, sadly, that's harder to fix, but it's unlikely enough that we can paper over it with asserts on `.emit()`
* `.cancel()` now consumes `DiagnosticBuilder`, preventing `.emit()` calls on a cancelled diagnostic
  * it's also now done internally, through `DiagnosticBuilder`-private state, instead of having a `Level::Cancelled` variant that can be read (or worse, written) by the user
  * this removes a hazard of calling `.cancel()` on an error then continuing to attach details to it, and even expect to be able to `.emit()` it
  * warnings were switched to *only* `can_emit_warnings` on emission (instead of pre-cancelling early)
  * `struct_dummy` was removed (as it relied on a pre-`Cancelled` `Diagnostic`)
* since `.emit()` doesn't consume the `DiagnosticBuilder` <sub>(I tried and gave up, it's much more work than this PR)</sub>,
  we have to make `.emit()` idempotent wrt the guarantees it returns
  * thankfully, `err.emit(); err.emit();` can return `ErrorReported` both times, as the second `.emit()` call has no side-effects *only* because the first one did do the appropriate emission
* `&mut Diagnostic` is now used in a lot of function signatures, which used to take `&mut DiagnosticBuilder` (in the interest of not having to make those functions generic)
  * the APIs were already mostly identical, allowing for low-effort porting to this new setup
  * only some of the suggestion methods needed some rework, to have the extra `DiagnosticBuilder` functionality on the `Diagnostic` methods themselves (that change is also present in #93259)
  * `.emit()`/`.cancel()` aren't available, but IMO calling them from an "error decorator/annotator" function isn't a good practice, and can lead to strange behavior (from the caller's perspective)
  * `.downgrade_to_delayed_bug()` was added, letting you convert any `.is_error()` diagnostic into a `delay_span_bug` one (which works because in both cases the guarantees available are the same)

This PR should ideally be reviewed commit-by-commit, since there is a lot of fallout in each.

r? `@estebank` cc `@Manishearth` `@nikomatsakis` `@mark-i-m`
This commit is contained in:
bors 2022-02-25 00:46:04 +00:00
commit d4de1f230c
134 changed files with 1497 additions and 1143 deletions

View file

@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ use crate::traits::{
};
use rustc_data_structures::fx::{FxHashMap, FxHashSet};
use rustc_errors::{pluralize, struct_span_err};
use rustc_errors::{pluralize, struct_span_err, Diagnostic, ErrorReported};
use rustc_errors::{Applicability, DiagnosticBuilder, DiagnosticStyledString};
use rustc_hir as hir;
use rustc_hir::def_id::DefId;
@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ pub mod nice_region_error;
pub(super) fn note_and_explain_region<'tcx>(
tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>,
err: &mut DiagnosticBuilder<'_>,
err: &mut Diagnostic,
prefix: &str,
region: ty::Region<'tcx>,
suffix: &str,
@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ pub(super) fn note_and_explain_region<'tcx>(
fn explain_free_region<'tcx>(
tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>,
err: &mut DiagnosticBuilder<'_>,
err: &mut Diagnostic,
prefix: &str,
region: ty::Region<'tcx>,
suffix: &str,
@ -194,7 +194,7 @@ fn msg_span_from_early_bound_and_free_regions<'tcx>(
}
fn emit_msg_span(
err: &mut DiagnosticBuilder<'_>,
err: &mut Diagnostic,
prefix: &str,
description: String,
span: Option<Span>,
@ -210,7 +210,7 @@ fn emit_msg_span(
}
fn label_msg_span(
err: &mut DiagnosticBuilder<'_>,
err: &mut Diagnostic,
prefix: &str,
description: String,
span: Option<Span>,
@ -230,7 +230,7 @@ pub fn unexpected_hidden_region_diagnostic<'tcx>(
span: Span,
hidden_ty: Ty<'tcx>,
hidden_region: ty::Region<'tcx>,
) -> DiagnosticBuilder<'tcx> {
) -> DiagnosticBuilder<'tcx, ErrorReported> {
let mut err = struct_span_err!(
tcx.sess,
span,
@ -471,11 +471,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> InferCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
}
/// Adds a note if the types come from similarly named crates
fn check_and_note_conflicting_crates(
&self,
err: &mut DiagnosticBuilder<'_>,
terr: &TypeError<'tcx>,
) {
fn check_and_note_conflicting_crates(&self, err: &mut Diagnostic, terr: &TypeError<'tcx>) {
use hir::def_id::CrateNum;
use rustc_hir::definitions::DisambiguatedDefPathData;
use ty::print::Printer;
@ -557,7 +553,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> InferCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
}
}
let report_path_match = |err: &mut DiagnosticBuilder<'_>, did1: DefId, did2: DefId| {
let report_path_match = |err: &mut Diagnostic, did1: DefId, did2: DefId| {
// Only external crates, if either is from a local
// module we could have false positives
if !(did1.is_local() || did2.is_local()) && did1.krate != did2.krate {
@ -598,7 +594,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> InferCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
fn note_error_origin(
&self,
err: &mut DiagnosticBuilder<'tcx>,
err: &mut Diagnostic,
cause: &ObligationCause<'tcx>,
exp_found: Option<ty::error::ExpectedFound<Ty<'tcx>>>,
terr: &TypeError<'tcx>,
@ -792,7 +788,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> InferCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
fn suggest_boxing_for_return_impl_trait(
&self,
err: &mut DiagnosticBuilder<'tcx>,
err: &mut Diagnostic,
return_sp: Span,
arm_spans: impl Iterator<Item = Span>,
) {
@ -1436,7 +1432,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> InferCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
/// E0271, like `src/test/ui/issues/issue-39970.stderr`.
pub fn note_type_err(
&self,
diag: &mut DiagnosticBuilder<'tcx>,
diag: &mut Diagnostic,
cause: &ObligationCause<'tcx>,
secondary_span: Option<(Span, String)>,
mut values: Option<ValuePairs<'tcx>>,
@ -1483,14 +1479,14 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> InferCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
types_visitor
}
fn report(&self, err: &mut DiagnosticBuilder<'_>) {
fn report(&self, err: &mut Diagnostic) {
self.add_labels_for_types(err, "expected", &self.expected);
self.add_labels_for_types(err, "found", &self.found);
}
fn add_labels_for_types(
&self,
err: &mut DiagnosticBuilder<'_>,
err: &mut Diagnostic,
target: &str,
types: &FxHashMap<TyCategory, FxHashSet<Span>>,
) {
@ -1601,7 +1597,9 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> InferCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
Some((expected, found)) => Some((expected, found)),
None => {
// Derived error. Cancel the emitter.
diag.cancel();
// NOTE(eddyb) this was `.cancel()`, but `diag`
// is borrowed, so we can't fully defuse it.
diag.downgrade_to_delayed_bug();
return;
}
};
@ -1817,7 +1815,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> InferCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
cause: &ObligationCause<'tcx>,
exp_span: Span,
exp_found: &ty::error::ExpectedFound<Ty<'tcx>>,
diag: &mut DiagnosticBuilder<'tcx>,
diag: &mut Diagnostic,
) {
debug!(
"suggest_await_on_expect_found: exp_span={:?}, expected_ty={:?}, found_ty={:?}",
@ -1905,7 +1903,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> InferCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
&self,
cause: &ObligationCause<'tcx>,
exp_found: &ty::error::ExpectedFound<Ty<'tcx>>,
diag: &mut DiagnosticBuilder<'tcx>,
diag: &mut Diagnostic,
) {
debug!(
"suggest_accessing_field_where_appropriate(cause={:?}, exp_found={:?})",
@ -1954,7 +1952,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> InferCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
&self,
span: Span,
exp_found: &ty::error::ExpectedFound<Ty<'tcx>>,
diag: &mut DiagnosticBuilder<'tcx>,
diag: &mut Diagnostic,
) {
if let (ty::Adt(exp_def, exp_substs), ty::Ref(_, found_ty, _)) =
(exp_found.expected.kind(), exp_found.found.kind())
@ -2015,7 +2013,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> InferCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
&self,
trace: TypeTrace<'tcx>,
terr: &TypeError<'tcx>,
) -> DiagnosticBuilder<'tcx> {
) -> DiagnosticBuilder<'tcx, ErrorReported> {
use crate::traits::ObligationCauseCode::MatchExpressionArm;
debug!("report_and_explain_type_error(trace={:?}, terr={:?})", trace, terr);
@ -2107,7 +2105,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> InferCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
fn emit_tuple_wrap_err(
&self,
err: &mut DiagnosticBuilder<'tcx>,
err: &mut Diagnostic,
span: Span,
found: Ty<'tcx>,
expected_fields: &List<Ty<'tcx>>,
@ -2223,7 +2221,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> InferCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
origin: Option<SubregionOrigin<'tcx>>,
bound_kind: GenericKind<'tcx>,
sub: Region<'tcx>,
) -> DiagnosticBuilder<'a> {
) -> DiagnosticBuilder<'a, ErrorReported> {
let hir = self.tcx.hir();
// Attempt to obtain the span of the parameter so we can
// suggest adding an explicit lifetime bound to it.
@ -2339,7 +2337,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> InferCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
}
fn binding_suggestion<'tcx, S: fmt::Display>(
err: &mut DiagnosticBuilder<'tcx>,
err: &mut Diagnostic,
type_param_span: Option<(Span, bool, bool)>,
bound_kind: GenericKind<'tcx>,
sub: S,
@ -2373,7 +2371,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> InferCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
}
let new_binding_suggestion =
|err: &mut DiagnosticBuilder<'tcx>,
|err: &mut Diagnostic,
type_param_span: Option<(Span, bool, bool)>,
bound_kind: GenericKind<'tcx>| {
let msg = "consider introducing an explicit lifetime bound";
@ -2649,7 +2647,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> InferCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
fn report_inference_failure(
&self,
var_origin: RegionVariableOrigin,
) -> DiagnosticBuilder<'tcx> {
) -> DiagnosticBuilder<'tcx, ErrorReported> {
let br_string = |br: ty::BoundRegionKind| {
let mut s = match br {
ty::BrNamed(_, name) => name.to_string(),

View file

@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
use crate::infer::type_variable::TypeVariableOriginKind;
use crate::infer::{InferCtxt, Symbol};
use rustc_errors::{pluralize, struct_span_err, Applicability, DiagnosticBuilder};
use rustc_errors::{
pluralize, struct_span_err, Applicability, Diagnostic, DiagnosticBuilder, ErrorReported,
};
use rustc_hir as hir;
use rustc_hir::def::{DefKind, Namespace};
use rustc_hir::def_id::DefId;
@ -195,7 +197,7 @@ impl UseDiagnostic<'_> {
}
}
fn attach_note(&self, err: &mut DiagnosticBuilder<'_>) {
fn attach_note(&self, err: &mut Diagnostic) {
match *self {
Self::TryConversion { pre_ty, post_ty, .. } => {
let intro = "`?` implicitly converts the error value";
@ -224,7 +226,7 @@ impl UseDiagnostic<'_> {
/// Suggest giving an appropriate return type to a closure expression.
fn closure_return_type_suggestion(
err: &mut DiagnosticBuilder<'_>,
err: &mut Diagnostic,
output: &FnRetTy<'_>,
body: &Body<'_>,
ret: &str,
@ -488,7 +490,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> InferCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
arg: GenericArg<'tcx>,
impl_candidates: Vec<ty::TraitRef<'tcx>>,
error_code: TypeAnnotationNeeded,
) -> DiagnosticBuilder<'tcx> {
) -> DiagnosticBuilder<'tcx, ErrorReported> {
let arg = self.resolve_vars_if_possible(arg);
let arg_data = self.extract_inference_diagnostics_data(arg, None);
@ -868,7 +870,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> InferCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
&self,
segment: &hir::PathSegment<'_>,
e: &Expr<'_>,
err: &mut DiagnosticBuilder<'_>,
err: &mut Diagnostic,
) {
if let (Some(typeck_results), None) = (self.in_progress_typeck_results, &segment.args) {
let borrow = typeck_results.borrow();
@ -913,7 +915,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> InferCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
kind: hir::GeneratorKind,
span: Span,
ty: Ty<'tcx>,
) -> DiagnosticBuilder<'tcx> {
) -> DiagnosticBuilder<'tcx, ErrorReported> {
let ty = self.resolve_vars_if_possible(ty);
let data = self.extract_inference_diagnostics_data(ty.into(), None);

View file

@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ use crate::infer::error_reporting::nice_region_error::NiceRegionError;
use crate::infer::lexical_region_resolve::RegionResolutionError;
use crate::infer::SubregionOrigin;
use rustc_errors::{struct_span_err, Applicability, DiagnosticBuilder, ErrorReported};
use rustc_errors::{struct_span_err, Applicability, Diagnostic, ErrorReported};
use rustc_hir as hir;
use rustc_hir::{GenericParamKind, Ty};
use rustc_middle::ty::Region;
@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> NiceRegionError<'a, 'tcx> {
sub: Region<'tcx>,
ty_sup: &Ty<'_>,
ty_sub: &Ty<'_>,
err: &mut DiagnosticBuilder<'_>,
err: &mut Diagnostic,
) {
if let (
hir::Ty { kind: hir::TyKind::Rptr(lifetime_sub, _), .. },

View file

@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ impl<'cx, 'tcx> NiceRegionError<'cx, 'tcx> {
self.infcx.tcx
}
pub fn try_report_from_nll(&self) -> Option<DiagnosticBuilder<'tcx>> {
pub fn try_report_from_nll(&self) -> Option<DiagnosticBuilder<'tcx, ErrorReported>> {
// Due to the improved diagnostics returned by the MIR borrow checker, only a subset of
// the nice region errors are required when running under the MIR borrow checker.
self.try_report_named_anon_conflict().or_else(|| self.try_report_placeholder_conflict())

View file

@ -2,13 +2,15 @@
//! where one region is named and the other is anonymous.
use crate::infer::error_reporting::nice_region_error::find_anon_type::find_anon_type;
use crate::infer::error_reporting::nice_region_error::NiceRegionError;
use rustc_errors::{struct_span_err, Applicability, DiagnosticBuilder};
use rustc_errors::{struct_span_err, Applicability, DiagnosticBuilder, ErrorReported};
use rustc_middle::ty;
impl<'a, 'tcx> NiceRegionError<'a, 'tcx> {
/// When given a `ConcreteFailure` for a function with parameters containing a named region and
/// an anonymous region, emit an descriptive diagnostic error.
pub(super) fn try_report_named_anon_conflict(&self) -> Option<DiagnosticBuilder<'tcx>> {
pub(super) fn try_report_named_anon_conflict(
&self,
) -> Option<DiagnosticBuilder<'tcx, ErrorReported>> {
let (span, sub, sup) = self.regions()?;
debug!(

View file

@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ use crate::infer::ValuePairs;
use crate::infer::{SubregionOrigin, TypeTrace};
use crate::traits::{ObligationCause, ObligationCauseCode};
use rustc_data_structures::intern::Interned;
use rustc_errors::DiagnosticBuilder;
use rustc_errors::{Diagnostic, DiagnosticBuilder, ErrorReported};
use rustc_hir::def::Namespace;
use rustc_hir::def_id::DefId;
use rustc_middle::ty::error::ExpectedFound;
@ -17,7 +17,9 @@ use std::fmt::{self, Write};
impl<'tcx> NiceRegionError<'_, 'tcx> {
/// When given a `ConcreteFailure` for a function with arguments containing a named region and
/// an anonymous region, emit a descriptive diagnostic error.
pub(super) fn try_report_placeholder_conflict(&self) -> Option<DiagnosticBuilder<'tcx>> {
pub(super) fn try_report_placeholder_conflict(
&self,
) -> Option<DiagnosticBuilder<'tcx, ErrorReported>> {
match &self.error {
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
// NB. The ordering of cases in this match is very
@ -153,7 +155,7 @@ impl<'tcx> NiceRegionError<'_, 'tcx> {
sub_placeholder: Option<Region<'tcx>>,
sup_placeholder: Option<Region<'tcx>>,
value_pairs: &ValuePairs<'tcx>,
) -> Option<DiagnosticBuilder<'tcx>> {
) -> Option<DiagnosticBuilder<'tcx, ErrorReported>> {
let (expected_substs, found_substs, trait_def_id) = match value_pairs {
ValuePairs::TraitRefs(ExpectedFound { expected, found })
if expected.def_id == found.def_id =>
@ -201,7 +203,7 @@ impl<'tcx> NiceRegionError<'_, 'tcx> {
trait_def_id: DefId,
expected_substs: SubstsRef<'tcx>,
actual_substs: SubstsRef<'tcx>,
) -> DiagnosticBuilder<'tcx> {
) -> DiagnosticBuilder<'tcx, ErrorReported> {
let span = cause.span(self.tcx());
let msg = format!(
"implementation of `{}` is not general enough",
@ -306,7 +308,7 @@ impl<'tcx> NiceRegionError<'_, 'tcx> {
/// due to the number of combinations we have to deal with.
fn explain_actual_impl_that_was_found(
&self,
err: &mut DiagnosticBuilder<'_>,
err: &mut Diagnostic,
sub_placeholder: Option<Region<'tcx>>,
sup_placeholder: Option<Region<'tcx>>,
has_sub: Option<usize>,

View file

@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ use crate::infer::lexical_region_resolve::RegionResolutionError;
use crate::infer::{SubregionOrigin, TypeTrace};
use crate::traits::{ObligationCauseCode, UnifyReceiverContext};
use rustc_data_structures::stable_set::FxHashSet;
use rustc_errors::{struct_span_err, Applicability, DiagnosticBuilder, ErrorReported};
use rustc_errors::{struct_span_err, Applicability, Diagnostic, ErrorReported};
use rustc_hir::def_id::DefId;
use rustc_hir::intravisit::{walk_ty, Visitor};
use rustc_hir::{self as hir, GenericBound, Item, ItemKind, Lifetime, LifetimeName, Node, TyKind};
@ -286,7 +286,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> NiceRegionError<'a, 'tcx> {
pub fn suggest_new_region_bound(
tcx: TyCtxt<'_>,
err: &mut DiagnosticBuilder<'_>,
err: &mut Diagnostic,
fn_returns: Vec<&rustc_hir::Ty<'_>>,
lifetime_name: String,
arg: Option<String>,
@ -483,7 +483,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> NiceRegionError<'a, 'tcx> {
/// `'static` obligation. Suggest relaxing that implicit bound.
fn find_impl_on_dyn_trait(
&self,
err: &mut DiagnosticBuilder<'_>,
err: &mut Diagnostic,
ty: Ty<'_>,
ctxt: &UnifyReceiverContext<'tcx>,
) -> bool {
@ -514,7 +514,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> NiceRegionError<'a, 'tcx> {
fn suggest_constrain_dyn_trait_in_impl(
&self,
err: &mut DiagnosticBuilder<'_>,
err: &mut Diagnostic,
found_dids: &FxHashSet<DefId>,
ident: Ident,
self_ty: &hir::Ty<'_>,

View file

@ -1,16 +1,12 @@
use crate::infer::error_reporting::{note_and_explain_region, ObligationCauseExt};
use crate::infer::{self, InferCtxt, SubregionOrigin};
use rustc_errors::{struct_span_err, DiagnosticBuilder};
use rustc_errors::{struct_span_err, Diagnostic, DiagnosticBuilder, ErrorReported};
use rustc_middle::traits::ObligationCauseCode;
use rustc_middle::ty::error::TypeError;
use rustc_middle::ty::{self, Region};
impl<'a, 'tcx> InferCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
pub(super) fn note_region_origin(
&self,
err: &mut DiagnosticBuilder<'_>,
origin: &SubregionOrigin<'tcx>,
) {
pub(super) fn note_region_origin(&self, err: &mut Diagnostic, origin: &SubregionOrigin<'tcx>) {
let mut label_or_note = |span, msg| {
let sub_count = err.children.iter().filter(|d| d.span.is_dummy()).count();
let expanded_sub_count = err.children.iter().filter(|d| !d.span.is_dummy()).count();
@ -113,7 +109,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> InferCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
origin: SubregionOrigin<'tcx>,
sub: Region<'tcx>,
sup: Region<'tcx>,
) -> DiagnosticBuilder<'tcx> {
) -> DiagnosticBuilder<'tcx, ErrorReported> {
match origin {
infer::Subtype(box trace) => {
let terr = TypeError::RegionsDoesNotOutlive(sup, sub);
@ -405,7 +401,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> InferCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
placeholder_origin: SubregionOrigin<'tcx>,
sub: Region<'tcx>,
sup: Region<'tcx>,
) -> DiagnosticBuilder<'tcx> {
) -> DiagnosticBuilder<'tcx, ErrorReported> {
// I can't think how to do better than this right now. -nikomatsakis
debug!(?placeholder_origin, ?sub, ?sup, "report_placeholder_failure");
match placeholder_origin {

View file

@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ use rustc_data_structures::fx::{FxHashMap, FxHashSet};
use rustc_data_structures::sync::Lrc;
use rustc_data_structures::undo_log::Rollback;
use rustc_data_structures::unify as ut;
use rustc_errors::DiagnosticBuilder;
use rustc_errors::{DiagnosticBuilder, ErrorReported};
use rustc_hir as hir;
use rustc_hir::def_id::{DefId, LocalDefId};
use rustc_middle::infer::canonical::{Canonical, CanonicalVarValues};
@ -1475,19 +1475,21 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> InferCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
sp: Span,
mk_diag: M,
actual_ty: Ty<'tcx>,
) -> DiagnosticBuilder<'tcx>
) -> DiagnosticBuilder<'tcx, ErrorReported>
where
M: FnOnce(String) -> DiagnosticBuilder<'tcx>,
M: FnOnce(String) -> DiagnosticBuilder<'tcx, ErrorReported>,
{
let actual_ty = self.resolve_vars_if_possible(actual_ty);
debug!("type_error_struct_with_diag({:?}, {:?})", sp, actual_ty);
let mut err = mk_diag(self.ty_to_string(actual_ty));
// Don't report an error if actual type is `Error`.
if actual_ty.references_error() {
return self.tcx.sess.diagnostic().struct_dummy();
err.downgrade_to_delayed_bug();
}
mk_diag(self.ty_to_string(actual_ty))
err
}
pub fn report_mismatched_types(
@ -1496,7 +1498,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> InferCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
expected: Ty<'tcx>,
actual: Ty<'tcx>,
err: TypeError<'tcx>,
) -> DiagnosticBuilder<'tcx> {
) -> DiagnosticBuilder<'tcx, ErrorReported> {
let trace = TypeTrace::types(cause, true, expected, actual);
self.report_and_explain_type_error(trace, &err)
}
@ -1507,7 +1509,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> InferCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
expected: ty::Const<'tcx>,
actual: ty::Const<'tcx>,
err: TypeError<'tcx>,
) -> DiagnosticBuilder<'tcx> {
) -> DiagnosticBuilder<'tcx, ErrorReported> {
let trace = TypeTrace::consts(cause, true, expected, actual);
self.report_and_explain_type_error(trace, &err)
}

View file

@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ use super::ObjectSafetyViolation;
use crate::infer::InferCtxt;
use rustc_data_structures::fx::FxHashSet;
use rustc_errors::{struct_span_err, DiagnosticBuilder};
use rustc_errors::{struct_span_err, DiagnosticBuilder, ErrorReported};
use rustc_hir as hir;
use rustc_hir::def_id::DefId;
use rustc_middle::ty::TyCtxt;
@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> InferCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
impl_item_def_id: DefId,
trait_item_def_id: DefId,
requirement: &dyn fmt::Display,
) -> DiagnosticBuilder<'tcx> {
) -> DiagnosticBuilder<'tcx, ErrorReported> {
let msg = "impl has stricter requirements than trait";
let sp = self.tcx.sess.source_map().guess_head_span(error_span);
@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ pub fn report_object_safety_error<'tcx>(
span: Span,
trait_def_id: DefId,
violations: &[ObjectSafetyViolation],
) -> DiagnosticBuilder<'tcx> {
) -> DiagnosticBuilder<'tcx, ErrorReported> {
let trait_str = tcx.def_path_str(trait_def_id);
let trait_span = tcx.hir().get_if_local(trait_def_id).and_then(|node| match node {
hir::Node::Item(item) => Some(item.ident.span),