1
Fork 0

Rename ACTIVE_FEATURES as UNSTABLE_FEATURES.

It's a better name, and lets "active features" refer to the features
that are active in a particular program, due to being declared or
enabled by the edition.

The commit also renames `Features::enabled` as `Features::active` to
match this; I changed my mind and have decided that "active" is a little
better thatn "enabled" for this, particularly because a number of
pre-existing comments use "active" in this way.

Finally, the commit renames `Status::Stable` as `Status::Accepted`, to
match `ACCEPTED_FEATURES`.
This commit is contained in:
Nicholas Nethercote 2023-10-05 19:43:35 +11:00
parent 41b6899487
commit d284c8a2d7
14 changed files with 199 additions and 201 deletions

View file

@ -2249,7 +2249,7 @@ declare_lint! {
}
declare_lint_pass!(
/// Check for used feature gates in `INCOMPLETE_FEATURES` in `rustc_feature/src/active.rs`.
/// Check for used feature gates in `INCOMPLETE_FEATURES` in `rustc_feature/src/unstable.rs`.
IncompleteInternalFeatures => [INCOMPLETE_FEATURES, INTERNAL_FEATURES]
);

View file

@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ pub(crate) fn provide(providers: &mut Providers) {
}
fn check_expectations(tcx: TyCtxt<'_>, tool_filter: Option<Symbol>) {
if !tcx.features().enabled(sym::lint_reasons) {
if !tcx.features().active(sym::lint_reasons) {
return;
}

View file

@ -1062,7 +1062,7 @@ impl<'s, P: LintLevelsProvider> LintLevelsBuilder<'s, P> {
#[track_caller]
fn check_gated_lint(&self, lint_id: LintId, span: Span, lint_from_cli: bool) -> bool {
if let Some(feature) = lint_id.lint.feature_gate {
if !self.features.enabled(feature) {
if !self.features.active(feature) {
let lint = builtin::UNKNOWN_LINTS;
let (level, src) = self.lint_level(builtin::UNKNOWN_LINTS);
struct_lint_level(