Rollup merge of #139564 - compiler-errors:deeply-norm, r=lcnr
Deeply normalize obligations in `BestObligation` folder Built on #139513. This establishes a somewhat rough invariant that the `Obligation`'s predicate is always deeply normalized in the folder; when we construct a new obligation we normalize it. Putting this up for discussion since it does affect some goals. r? lcnr
This commit is contained in:
commit
d213934874
11 changed files with 194 additions and 90 deletions
|
@ -13,9 +13,9 @@ use rustc_next_trait_solver::solve::{GenerateProofTree, SolverDelegateEvalExt as
|
|||
use rustc_type_ir::solve::NoSolution;
|
||||
use tracing::{instrument, trace};
|
||||
|
||||
use crate::solve::Certainty;
|
||||
use crate::solve::delegate::SolverDelegate;
|
||||
use crate::solve::inspect::{self, ProofTreeInferCtxtExt, ProofTreeVisitor};
|
||||
use crate::solve::{Certainty, deeply_normalize_for_diagnostics};
|
||||
use crate::traits::{FulfillmentError, FulfillmentErrorCode, wf};
|
||||
|
||||
pub(super) fn fulfillment_error_for_no_solution<'tcx>(
|
||||
|
@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ fn find_best_leaf_obligation<'tcx>(
|
|||
//
|
||||
// We should probably fix the visitor to not do so instead, as this also
|
||||
// means the leaf obligation may be incorrect.
|
||||
infcx
|
||||
let obligation = infcx
|
||||
.fudge_inference_if_ok(|| {
|
||||
infcx
|
||||
.visit_proof_tree(
|
||||
|
@ -161,7 +161,8 @@ fn find_best_leaf_obligation<'tcx>(
|
|||
.break_value()
|
||||
.ok_or(())
|
||||
})
|
||||
.unwrap_or(obligation)
|
||||
.unwrap_or(obligation);
|
||||
deeply_normalize_for_diagnostics(infcx, obligation.param_env, obligation)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
struct BestObligation<'tcx> {
|
||||
|
@ -298,7 +299,7 @@ impl<'tcx> BestObligation<'tcx> {
|
|||
/// `NormalizesTo` goal, so we don't fall back to the rigid projection check
|
||||
/// that should catch when a projection goal fails due to an unsatisfied trait
|
||||
/// goal.
|
||||
fn detect_error_in_higher_ranked_projection(
|
||||
fn detect_trait_error_in_higher_ranked_projection(
|
||||
&mut self,
|
||||
goal: &inspect::InspectGoal<'_, 'tcx>,
|
||||
) -> ControlFlow<PredicateObligation<'tcx>> {
|
||||
|
@ -307,7 +308,13 @@ impl<'tcx> BestObligation<'tcx> {
|
|||
&& !projection_clause.bound_vars().is_empty()
|
||||
{
|
||||
let pred = projection_clause.map_bound(|proj| proj.projection_term.trait_ref(tcx));
|
||||
self.with_derived_obligation(self.obligation.with(tcx, pred), |this| {
|
||||
let obligation = Obligation::new(
|
||||
tcx,
|
||||
self.obligation.cause.clone(),
|
||||
goal.goal().param_env,
|
||||
deeply_normalize_for_diagnostics(goal.infcx(), goal.goal().param_env, pred),
|
||||
);
|
||||
self.with_derived_obligation(obligation, |this| {
|
||||
goal.infcx().visit_proof_tree_at_depth(
|
||||
goal.goal().with(tcx, pred),
|
||||
goal.depth() + 1,
|
||||
|
@ -388,7 +395,8 @@ impl<'tcx> ProofTreeVisitor<'tcx> for BestObligation<'tcx> {
|
|||
(true, Ok(Certainty::Maybe(MaybeCause::Ambiguity))) | (false, Err(_)) => {}
|
||||
_ => return ControlFlow::Continue(()),
|
||||
}
|
||||
let pred_kind = goal.goal().predicate.kind();
|
||||
|
||||
let pred = goal.goal().predicate;
|
||||
|
||||
let candidates = self.non_trivial_candidates(goal);
|
||||
let candidate = match candidates.as_slice() {
|
||||
|
@ -410,12 +418,12 @@ impl<'tcx> ProofTreeVisitor<'tcx> for BestObligation<'tcx> {
|
|||
|
||||
// FIXME: Also, what about considering >1 layer up the stack? May be necessary
|
||||
// for normalizes-to.
|
||||
let child_mode = match pred_kind.skip_binder() {
|
||||
ty::PredicateKind::Clause(ty::ClauseKind::Trait(pred)) => {
|
||||
ChildMode::Trait(pred_kind.rebind(pred))
|
||||
let child_mode = match pred.kind().skip_binder() {
|
||||
ty::PredicateKind::Clause(ty::ClauseKind::Trait(trait_pred)) => {
|
||||
ChildMode::Trait(pred.kind().rebind(trait_pred))
|
||||
}
|
||||
ty::PredicateKind::Clause(ty::ClauseKind::HostEffect(pred)) => {
|
||||
ChildMode::Host(pred_kind.rebind(pred))
|
||||
ty::PredicateKind::Clause(ty::ClauseKind::HostEffect(host_pred)) => {
|
||||
ChildMode::Host(pred.kind().rebind(host_pred))
|
||||
}
|
||||
ty::PredicateKind::NormalizesTo(normalizes_to)
|
||||
if matches!(
|
||||
|
@ -423,7 +431,7 @@ impl<'tcx> ProofTreeVisitor<'tcx> for BestObligation<'tcx> {
|
|||
ty::AliasTermKind::ProjectionTy | ty::AliasTermKind::ProjectionConst
|
||||
) =>
|
||||
{
|
||||
ChildMode::Trait(pred_kind.rebind(ty::TraitPredicate {
|
||||
ChildMode::Trait(pred.kind().rebind(ty::TraitPredicate {
|
||||
trait_ref: normalizes_to.alias.trait_ref(tcx),
|
||||
polarity: ty::PredicatePolarity::Positive,
|
||||
}))
|
||||
|
@ -457,10 +465,12 @@ impl<'tcx> ProofTreeVisitor<'tcx> for BestObligation<'tcx> {
|
|||
for nested_goal in nested_goals {
|
||||
trace!(nested_goal = ?(nested_goal.goal(), nested_goal.source(), nested_goal.result()));
|
||||
|
||||
let nested_pred = nested_goal.goal().predicate;
|
||||
|
||||
let make_obligation = |cause| Obligation {
|
||||
cause,
|
||||
param_env: nested_goal.goal().param_env,
|
||||
predicate: nested_goal.goal().predicate,
|
||||
predicate: nested_pred,
|
||||
recursion_depth: self.obligation.recursion_depth + 1,
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -510,31 +520,20 @@ impl<'tcx> ProofTreeVisitor<'tcx> for BestObligation<'tcx> {
|
|||
|
||||
// alias-relate may fail because the lhs or rhs can't be normalized,
|
||||
// and therefore is treated as rigid.
|
||||
if let Some(ty::PredicateKind::AliasRelate(lhs, rhs, _)) = pred_kind.no_bound_vars() {
|
||||
if let Some(obligation) = goal
|
||||
.infcx()
|
||||
.visit_proof_tree_at_depth(
|
||||
goal.goal().with(tcx, ty::ClauseKind::WellFormed(lhs.into())),
|
||||
goal.depth() + 1,
|
||||
self,
|
||||
)
|
||||
.break_value()
|
||||
{
|
||||
return ControlFlow::Break(obligation);
|
||||
} else if let Some(obligation) = goal
|
||||
.infcx()
|
||||
.visit_proof_tree_at_depth(
|
||||
goal.goal().with(tcx, ty::ClauseKind::WellFormed(rhs.into())),
|
||||
goal.depth() + 1,
|
||||
self,
|
||||
)
|
||||
.break_value()
|
||||
{
|
||||
return ControlFlow::Break(obligation);
|
||||
}
|
||||
if let Some(ty::PredicateKind::AliasRelate(lhs, rhs, _)) = pred.kind().no_bound_vars() {
|
||||
goal.infcx().visit_proof_tree_at_depth(
|
||||
goal.goal().with(tcx, ty::ClauseKind::WellFormed(lhs.into())),
|
||||
goal.depth() + 1,
|
||||
self,
|
||||
)?;
|
||||
goal.infcx().visit_proof_tree_at_depth(
|
||||
goal.goal().with(tcx, ty::ClauseKind::WellFormed(rhs.into())),
|
||||
goal.depth() + 1,
|
||||
self,
|
||||
)?;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
self.detect_error_in_higher_ranked_projection(goal)?;
|
||||
self.detect_trait_error_in_higher_ranked_projection(goal)?;
|
||||
|
||||
ControlFlow::Break(self.obligation.clone())
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -253,20 +253,28 @@ impl<'tcx> TypeFolder<TyCtxt<'tcx>> for DeeplyNormalizeForDiagnosticsFolder<'_,
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn fold_ty(&mut self, ty: Ty<'tcx>) -> Ty<'tcx> {
|
||||
deeply_normalize_with_skipped_universes(
|
||||
self.at,
|
||||
ty,
|
||||
vec![None; ty.outer_exclusive_binder().as_usize()],
|
||||
)
|
||||
.unwrap_or_else(|_: Vec<ScrubbedTraitError<'tcx>>| ty.super_fold_with(self))
|
||||
let infcx = self.at.infcx;
|
||||
infcx
|
||||
.commit_if_ok(|_| {
|
||||
deeply_normalize_with_skipped_universes(
|
||||
self.at,
|
||||
ty,
|
||||
vec![None; ty.outer_exclusive_binder().as_usize()],
|
||||
)
|
||||
})
|
||||
.unwrap_or_else(|_: Vec<ScrubbedTraitError<'tcx>>| ty.super_fold_with(self))
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn fold_const(&mut self, ct: ty::Const<'tcx>) -> ty::Const<'tcx> {
|
||||
deeply_normalize_with_skipped_universes(
|
||||
self.at,
|
||||
ct,
|
||||
vec![None; ct.outer_exclusive_binder().as_usize()],
|
||||
)
|
||||
.unwrap_or_else(|_: Vec<ScrubbedTraitError<'tcx>>| ct.super_fold_with(self))
|
||||
let infcx = self.at.infcx;
|
||||
infcx
|
||||
.commit_if_ok(|_| {
|
||||
deeply_normalize_with_skipped_universes(
|
||||
self.at,
|
||||
ct,
|
||||
vec![None; ct.outer_exclusive_binder().as_usize()],
|
||||
)
|
||||
})
|
||||
.unwrap_or_else(|_: Vec<ScrubbedTraitError<'tcx>>| ct.super_fold_with(self))
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue