Move /src/test to /tests
This commit is contained in:
parent
ca855e6e42
commit
cf2dff2b1e
27592 changed files with 0 additions and 0 deletions
60
tests/ui/array-slice-vec/nested-vec-3.rs
Normal file
60
tests/ui/array-slice-vec/nested-vec-3.rs
Normal file
|
@ -0,0 +1,60 @@
|
|||
// run-pass
|
||||
// needs-unwind
|
||||
#![allow(overflowing_literals)]
|
||||
|
||||
// ignore-emscripten no threads support
|
||||
|
||||
// Test that using the `vec!` macro nested within itself works when
|
||||
// the contents implement Drop and we hit a panic in the middle of
|
||||
// construction.
|
||||
|
||||
use std::thread;
|
||||
use std::sync::atomic::{AtomicUsize, Ordering};
|
||||
|
||||
static LOG: AtomicUsize = AtomicUsize::new(0);
|
||||
|
||||
struct D(u8);
|
||||
|
||||
impl Drop for D {
|
||||
fn drop(&mut self) {
|
||||
println!("Dropping {}", self.0);
|
||||
let old = LOG.load(Ordering::SeqCst);
|
||||
let _ = LOG.compare_exchange(
|
||||
old,
|
||||
old << 4 | self.0 as usize,
|
||||
Ordering::SeqCst,
|
||||
Ordering::SeqCst,
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn main() {
|
||||
fn die() -> D { panic!("Oh no"); }
|
||||
let g = thread::spawn(|| {
|
||||
let _nested = vec![vec![D( 1), D( 2), D( 3), D( 4)],
|
||||
vec![D( 5), D( 6), D( 7), D( 8)],
|
||||
vec![D( 9), D(10), die(), D(12)],
|
||||
vec![D(13), D(14), D(15), D(16)]];
|
||||
});
|
||||
assert!(g.join().is_err());
|
||||
|
||||
// When the panic occurs, we will be in the midst of constructing the
|
||||
// second inner vector. Therefore, we drop the elements of the
|
||||
// partially filled vector first, before we get around to dropping
|
||||
// the elements of the filled vector.
|
||||
|
||||
// Issue 23222: The order in which the elements actually get
|
||||
// dropped is a little funky: as noted above, we'll drop the 9+10
|
||||
// first, but due to #23222, they get dropped in reverse
|
||||
// order. Likewise, again due to #23222, we will drop the second
|
||||
// filled vec before the first filled vec.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// If Issue 23222 is "fixed", then presumably the corrected
|
||||
// expected order of events will be 0x__9_A__1_2_3_4__5_6_7_8;
|
||||
// that is, we would still drop 9+10 first, since they belong to
|
||||
// the more deeply nested expression when the panic occurs.
|
||||
|
||||
let expect = 0x__A_9__5_6_7_8__1_2_3_4;
|
||||
let actual = LOG.load(Ordering::SeqCst);
|
||||
assert!(actual == expect, "expect: 0x{:x} actual: 0x{:x}", expect, actual);
|
||||
}
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue