Rollup merge of #97495 - clarfonthey:e0788-no-coverage, r=nagisa
Add E0788 for improper #[no_coverage] usage Essentially, this adds proper checking for the attribute (tracking issue #84605) and throws errors when it's put in obviously-wrong places, like on struct or const definitions. Most of the code is taken directly from the checks for the `#[inline]` attribute, since it's very similar. Right now, the code only checks at the function level, but it seems reasonable to allow adding `#[no_coverage]` to individual blocks or expressions, so, for now those just throw `unused_attributes` warnings. Similarly, since there was a lot of desire to eventually allow recursive definitions as well on modules and impl blocks, these also throw `unused_attributes` instead of an error. I'm not sure if anything has to be done since this error is technically for an unstable feature, but since an error for using unstable features will show up anyway, I think it's okay. This is the first big piece needed for stabilising this attribute, although I personally would like to explore renaming it to `#[coverage(never)]` on a separate PR, which I will offer soon. There's a lot of discussion still to be had about that, which is why it will be kept separate. I don't think much is needed besides adding this simple check and a UI test, but let me know if there's something else that should be added to make this happen.
This commit is contained in:
commit
cb787bea46
5 changed files with 235 additions and 0 deletions
|
@ -491,6 +491,7 @@ E0784: include_str!("./error_codes/E0784.md"),
|
|||
E0785: include_str!("./error_codes/E0785.md"),
|
||||
E0786: include_str!("./error_codes/E0786.md"),
|
||||
E0787: include_str!("./error_codes/E0787.md"),
|
||||
E0788: include_str!("./error_codes/E0788.md"),
|
||||
;
|
||||
// E0006, // merged with E0005
|
||||
// E0008, // cannot bind by-move into a pattern guard
|
||||
|
|
26
compiler/rustc_error_codes/src/error_codes/E0788.md
Normal file
26
compiler/rustc_error_codes/src/error_codes/E0788.md
Normal file
|
@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
|
|||
A `#[no_coverage]` attribute was applied to something which does not show up
|
||||
in code coverage, or is too granular to be excluded from the coverage report.
|
||||
|
||||
For now, this attribute can only be applied to function, method, and closure
|
||||
definitions. In the future, it may be added to statements, blocks, and
|
||||
expressions, and for the time being, using this attribute in those places
|
||||
will just emit an `unused_attributes` lint instead of this error.
|
||||
|
||||
Example of erroneous code:
|
||||
|
||||
```compile_fail,E0788
|
||||
#[no_coverage]
|
||||
struct Foo;
|
||||
|
||||
#[no_coverage]
|
||||
const FOO: Foo = Foo;
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
`#[no_coverage]` tells the compiler to not generate coverage instrumentation for
|
||||
a piece of code when the `-C instrument-coverage` flag is passed. Things like
|
||||
structs and consts are not coverable code, and thus cannot do anything with this
|
||||
attribute.
|
||||
|
||||
If you wish to apply this attribute to all methods in an impl or module,
|
||||
manually annotate each method; it is not possible to annotate the entire impl
|
||||
with a `#[no_coverage]` attribute.
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue