bjoernager/rust
bjoernager/rust
1
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Activity

rename mir::Constant -> mir::ConstOperand, mir::ConstKind -> mir::Const

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Ralf Jung 2023-09-20 20:51:14 +02:00
parent a2374e65aa
commit c94410c145
72 changed files with 430 additions and 449 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

4
compiler/rustc_codegen_ssa/src/mir/block.rs
View file

@ -1098,8 +1098,8 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx, Bx: BuilderMethods<'a, 'tcx>> FunctionCx<'a, 'tcx, Bx> {
InlineAsmOperandRef::Const { string }
}
mir::InlineAsmOperand::SymFn { ref value } => {
let literal = self.monomorphize(value.literal);
if let ty::FnDef(def_id, args) = *literal.ty().kind() {
let const_ = self.monomorphize(value.const_);
if let ty::FnDef(def_id, args) = *const_.ty().kind() {
let instance = ty::Instance::resolve_for_fn_ptr(
bx.tcx(),
ty::ParamEnv::reveal_all(),

20
compiler/rustc_codegen_ssa/src/mir/constant.rs
View file

@ -13,37 +13,37 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx, Bx: BuilderMethods<'a, 'tcx>> FunctionCx<'a, 'tcx, Bx> {
pub fn eval_mir_constant_to_operand(
&self,
bx: &mut Bx,
constant: &mir::Constant<'tcx>,
constant: &mir::ConstOperand<'tcx>,
) -> OperandRef<'tcx, Bx::Value> {
let val = self.eval_mir_constant(constant);
let ty = self.monomorphize(constant.ty());
OperandRef::from_const(bx, val, ty)
}
pub fn eval_mir_constant(&self, constant: &mir::Constant<'tcx>) -> mir::ConstValue<'tcx> {
self.monomorphize(constant.literal)
pub fn eval_mir_constant(&self, constant: &mir::ConstOperand<'tcx>) -> mir::ConstValue<'tcx> {
self.monomorphize(constant.const_)
.eval(self.cx.tcx(), ty::ParamEnv::reveal_all(), Some(constant.span))
.expect("erroneous constant not captured by required_consts")
}
/// This is a convenience helper for `simd_shuffle_indices`. It has the precondition
/// that the given `constant` is an `ConstantKind::Unevaluated` and must be convertible to
/// that the given `constant` is an `Const::Unevaluated` and must be convertible to
/// a `ValTree`. If you want a more general version of this, talk to `wg-const-eval` on zulip.
///
/// Note that this function is cursed, since usually MIR consts should not be evaluated to valtrees!
pub fn eval_unevaluated_mir_constant_to_valtree(
&self,
constant: &mir::Constant<'tcx>,
constant: &mir::ConstOperand<'tcx>,
) -> Result<Option<ty::ValTree<'tcx>>, ErrorHandled> {
let uv = match self.monomorphize(constant.literal) {
mir::ConstantKind::Unevaluated(uv, _) => uv.shrink(),
mir::ConstantKind::Ty(c) => match c.kind() {
let uv = match self.monomorphize(constant.const_) {
mir::Const::Unevaluated(uv, _) => uv.shrink(),
mir::Const::Ty(c) => match c.kind() {
// A constant that came from a const generic but was then used as an argument to old-style
// simd_shuffle (passing as argument instead of as a generic param).
rustc_type_ir::ConstKind::Value(valtree) => return Ok(Some(valtree)),
other => span_bug!(constant.span, "{other:#?}"),
},
// We should never encounter `ConstantKind::Val` unless MIR opts (like const prop) evaluate
// We should never encounter `Const::Val` unless MIR opts (like const prop) evaluate
// a constant and write that value back into `Operand`s. This could happen, but is unlikely.
// Also: all users of `simd_shuffle` are on unstable and already need to take a lot of care
// around intrinsics. For an issue to happen here, it would require a macro expanding to a
@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx, Bx: BuilderMethods<'a, 'tcx>> FunctionCx<'a, 'tcx, Bx> {
pub fn simd_shuffle_indices(
&mut self,
bx: &Bx,
constant: &mir::Constant<'tcx>,
constant: &mir::ConstOperand<'tcx>,
) -> (Bx::Value, Ty<'tcx>) {
let ty = self.monomorphize(constant.ty());
let val = self