structurally important functions to debug
This commit is contained in:
parent
41ebd16266
commit
c66328f9ad
4 changed files with 13 additions and 10 deletions
|
@ -282,7 +282,7 @@ impl<'tcx> EvalCtxt<'_, 'tcx> {
|
|||
};
|
||||
|
||||
if normalized_self_ty.is_ty_var() {
|
||||
trace!("self type has been normalized to infer");
|
||||
debug!("self type has been normalized to infer");
|
||||
return self.forced_ambiguity(MaybeCause::Ambiguity).into_iter().collect();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -785,7 +785,7 @@ impl<'tcx> EvalCtxt<'_, 'tcx> {
|
|||
// FIXME(@lcnr): The current structure here makes me unhappy and feels ugly. idk how
|
||||
// to improve this however. However, this should make it fairly straightforward to refine
|
||||
// the filtering going forward, so it seems alright-ish for now.
|
||||
#[instrument(level = "trace", skip(self, goal))]
|
||||
#[instrument(level = "debug", skip(self, goal))]
|
||||
fn discard_impls_shadowed_by_env<G: GoalKind<'tcx>>(
|
||||
&mut self,
|
||||
goal: Goal<'tcx, G>,
|
||||
|
@ -814,7 +814,7 @@ impl<'tcx> EvalCtxt<'_, 'tcx> {
|
|||
Certainty::Yes => {
|
||||
candidates.retain(|c| match c.source {
|
||||
CandidateSource::Impl(_) | CandidateSource::BuiltinImpl(_) => {
|
||||
trace!(?c, "discard impl candidate");
|
||||
debug!(?c, "discard impl candidate");
|
||||
false
|
||||
}
|
||||
CandidateSource::ParamEnv(_) | CandidateSource::AliasBound => true,
|
||||
|
@ -825,7 +825,7 @@ impl<'tcx> EvalCtxt<'_, 'tcx> {
|
|||
// to be ambig and wait for inference constraints. See
|
||||
// tests/ui/traits/next-solver/env-shadows-impls/ambig-env-no-shadow.rs
|
||||
Certainty::Maybe(cause) => {
|
||||
trace!(?cause, "force ambiguity");
|
||||
debug!(?cause, "force ambiguity");
|
||||
*candidates = self.forced_ambiguity(cause).into_iter().collect();
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -836,7 +836,7 @@ impl<'tcx> EvalCtxt<'_, 'tcx> {
|
|||
/// If there are multiple ways to prove a trait or projection goal, we have
|
||||
/// to somehow try to merge the candidates into one. If that fails, we return
|
||||
/// ambiguity.
|
||||
#[instrument(level = "trace", skip(self), ret)]
|
||||
#[instrument(level = "debug", skip(self), ret)]
|
||||
pub(super) fn merge_candidates(
|
||||
&mut self,
|
||||
candidates: Vec<Candidate<'tcx>>,
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ impl<'tcx> InferCtxt<'tcx> {
|
|||
///
|
||||
/// Using this while inside of the solver is wrong as it uses a new
|
||||
/// search graph which would break cycle detection.
|
||||
#[instrument(level = "trace", skip(self))]
|
||||
#[instrument(level = "debug", skip(self))]
|
||||
fn evaluate_root_goal(
|
||||
&self,
|
||||
goal: Goal<'tcx, ty::Predicate<'tcx>>,
|
||||
|
@ -276,7 +276,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> EvalCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
|
|||
/// Instead of calling this function directly, use either [EvalCtxt::evaluate_goal]
|
||||
/// if you're inside of the solver or [InferCtxtEvalExt::evaluate_root_goal] if you're
|
||||
/// outside of it.
|
||||
#[instrument(level = "trace", skip(tcx, search_graph, goal_evaluation), ret)]
|
||||
#[instrument(level = "debug", skip(tcx, search_graph, goal_evaluation), ret)]
|
||||
fn evaluate_canonical_goal(
|
||||
tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>,
|
||||
search_graph: &'a mut search_graph::SearchGraph<'tcx>,
|
||||
|
@ -464,7 +464,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> EvalCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
|
|||
self.nested_goals.normalizes_to_goals.push(goal);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[instrument(level = "trace", skip(self))]
|
||||
#[instrument(level = "debug", skip(self))]
|
||||
pub(super) fn add_goal(&mut self, source: GoalSource, goal: Goal<'tcx, ty::Predicate<'tcx>>) {
|
||||
self.inspect.add_goal(self.infcx, self.max_input_universe, source, goal);
|
||||
self.nested_goals.goals.push((source, goal));
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -58,6 +58,7 @@ impl<'tcx, F> TraitProbeCtxt<'_, '_, 'tcx, F>
|
|||
where
|
||||
F: FnOnce(&QueryResult<'tcx>) -> inspect::ProbeKind<'tcx>,
|
||||
{
|
||||
#[instrument(level = "debug", skip_all, fields(source = ?self.source))]
|
||||
pub(in crate::solve) fn enter(
|
||||
self,
|
||||
f: impl FnOnce(&mut EvalCtxt<'_, 'tcx>) -> QueryResult<'tcx>,
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -296,6 +296,7 @@ impl<'tcx> SearchGraph<'tcx> {
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
self.on_cache_hit(reached_depth, encountered_overflow);
|
||||
debug!("global cache hit");
|
||||
return result;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -315,6 +316,7 @@ impl<'tcx> SearchGraph<'tcx> {
|
|||
.filter(|p| !Self::stack_coinductive_from(tcx, &self.stack, p.head))
|
||||
})
|
||||
{
|
||||
debug!("provisional cache hit");
|
||||
// We have a nested goal which is already in the provisional cache, use
|
||||
// its result. We do not provide any usage kind as that should have been
|
||||
// already set correctly while computing the cache entry.
|
||||
|
@ -328,7 +330,7 @@ impl<'tcx> SearchGraph<'tcx> {
|
|||
);
|
||||
return entry.result;
|
||||
} else if let Some(stack_depth) = cache_entry.stack_depth {
|
||||
trace!("encountered cycle with depth {stack_depth:?}");
|
||||
debug!("encountered cycle with depth {stack_depth:?}");
|
||||
// We have a nested goal which directly relies on a goal deeper in the stack.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// We start by tagging all cycle participants, as that's necessary for caching.
|
||||
|
@ -436,7 +438,7 @@ impl<'tcx> SearchGraph<'tcx> {
|
|||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
trace!("canonical cycle overflow");
|
||||
debug!("canonical cycle overflow");
|
||||
let current_entry = self.pop_stack();
|
||||
debug_assert!(current_entry.has_been_used.is_empty());
|
||||
let result = Self::response_no_constraints(tcx, input, Certainty::overflow(false));
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue