Auto merge of #97624 - matthiaskrgr:rollup-rtcqjx9, r=matthiaskrgr
Rollup of 4 pull requests Successful merges: - #96271 (suggest `?` when method is missing on `Result<T, _>` but found on `T`) - #97264 (Suggest `extern crate foo` when failing to resolve `use foo`) - #97592 (rustdoc: also index impl trait and raw pointers) - #97621 (update Miri) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
This commit is contained in:
commit
b5a2d27f8f
38 changed files with 647 additions and 69 deletions
|
@ -1839,9 +1839,18 @@ impl<'a> Resolver<'a> {
|
|||
)),
|
||||
)
|
||||
} else if self.session.edition() == Edition::Edition2015 {
|
||||
(format!("maybe a missing crate `{}`?", ident), None)
|
||||
(
|
||||
format!("maybe a missing crate `{ident}`?"),
|
||||
Some((
|
||||
vec![],
|
||||
format!(
|
||||
"consider adding `extern crate {ident}` to use the `{ident}` crate"
|
||||
),
|
||||
Applicability::MaybeIncorrect,
|
||||
)),
|
||||
)
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
(format!("could not find `{}` in the crate root", ident), None)
|
||||
(format!("could not find `{ident}` in the crate root"), None)
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else if i > 0 {
|
||||
let parent = path[i - 1].ident.name;
|
||||
|
@ -1852,7 +1861,7 @@ impl<'a> Resolver<'a> {
|
|||
"the list of imported crates".to_owned()
|
||||
}
|
||||
kw::PathRoot | kw::Crate => "the crate root".to_owned(),
|
||||
_ => format!("`{}`", parent),
|
||||
_ => format!("`{parent}`"),
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
let mut msg = format!("could not find `{}` in {}", ident, parent);
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -475,6 +475,10 @@ impl<'a, 'b> ImportResolver<'a, 'b> {
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if let Some((suggestions, msg, applicability)) = err.suggestion {
|
||||
if suggestions.is_empty() {
|
||||
diag.help(&msg);
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
diag.multipart_suggestion(&msg, suggestions, applicability);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -978,45 +978,9 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> FnCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
|
|||
label_span_not_found(&mut err);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if let SelfSource::MethodCall(expr) = source
|
||||
&& let Some((fields, substs)) = self.get_field_candidates(span, actual)
|
||||
{
|
||||
let call_expr =
|
||||
self.tcx.hir().expect_expr(self.tcx.hir().get_parent_node(expr.hir_id));
|
||||
for candidate_field in fields.iter() {
|
||||
if let Some(field_path) = self.check_for_nested_field_satisfying(
|
||||
span,
|
||||
&|_, field_ty| {
|
||||
self.lookup_probe(
|
||||
span,
|
||||
item_name,
|
||||
field_ty,
|
||||
call_expr,
|
||||
ProbeScope::AllTraits,
|
||||
)
|
||||
.is_ok()
|
||||
},
|
||||
candidate_field,
|
||||
substs,
|
||||
vec![],
|
||||
self.tcx.parent_module(expr.hir_id).to_def_id(),
|
||||
) {
|
||||
let field_path_str = field_path
|
||||
.iter()
|
||||
.map(|id| id.name.to_ident_string())
|
||||
.collect::<Vec<String>>()
|
||||
.join(".");
|
||||
debug!("field_path_str: {:?}", field_path_str);
|
||||
self.check_for_field_method(&mut err, source, span, actual, item_name);
|
||||
|
||||
err.span_suggestion_verbose(
|
||||
item_name.span.shrink_to_lo(),
|
||||
"one of the expressions' fields has a method of the same name",
|
||||
format!("{field_path_str}."),
|
||||
Applicability::MaybeIncorrect,
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
self.check_for_unwrap_self(&mut err, source, span, actual, item_name);
|
||||
|
||||
bound_spans.sort();
|
||||
bound_spans.dedup();
|
||||
|
@ -1343,6 +1307,145 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> FnCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
|
|||
false
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn check_for_field_method(
|
||||
&self,
|
||||
err: &mut DiagnosticBuilder<'tcx, ErrorGuaranteed>,
|
||||
source: SelfSource<'tcx>,
|
||||
span: Span,
|
||||
actual: Ty<'tcx>,
|
||||
item_name: Ident,
|
||||
) {
|
||||
if let SelfSource::MethodCall(expr) = source
|
||||
&& let Some((fields, substs)) = self.get_field_candidates(span, actual)
|
||||
{
|
||||
let call_expr = self.tcx.hir().expect_expr(self.tcx.hir().get_parent_node(expr.hir_id));
|
||||
for candidate_field in fields.iter() {
|
||||
if let Some(field_path) = self.check_for_nested_field_satisfying(
|
||||
span,
|
||||
&|_, field_ty| {
|
||||
self.lookup_probe(
|
||||
span,
|
||||
item_name,
|
||||
field_ty,
|
||||
call_expr,
|
||||
ProbeScope::AllTraits,
|
||||
)
|
||||
.is_ok()
|
||||
},
|
||||
candidate_field,
|
||||
substs,
|
||||
vec![],
|
||||
self.tcx.parent_module(expr.hir_id).to_def_id(),
|
||||
) {
|
||||
let field_path_str = field_path
|
||||
.iter()
|
||||
.map(|id| id.name.to_ident_string())
|
||||
.collect::<Vec<String>>()
|
||||
.join(".");
|
||||
debug!("field_path_str: {:?}", field_path_str);
|
||||
|
||||
err.span_suggestion_verbose(
|
||||
item_name.span.shrink_to_lo(),
|
||||
"one of the expressions' fields has a method of the same name",
|
||||
format!("{field_path_str}."),
|
||||
Applicability::MaybeIncorrect,
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn check_for_unwrap_self(
|
||||
&self,
|
||||
err: &mut DiagnosticBuilder<'tcx, ErrorGuaranteed>,
|
||||
source: SelfSource<'tcx>,
|
||||
span: Span,
|
||||
actual: Ty<'tcx>,
|
||||
item_name: Ident,
|
||||
) {
|
||||
let tcx = self.tcx;
|
||||
let SelfSource::MethodCall(expr) = source else { return; };
|
||||
let call_expr = tcx.hir().expect_expr(tcx.hir().get_parent_node(expr.hir_id));
|
||||
|
||||
let ty::Adt(kind, substs) = actual.kind() else { return; };
|
||||
if !kind.is_enum() {
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
let matching_variants: Vec<_> = kind
|
||||
.variants()
|
||||
.iter()
|
||||
.flat_map(|variant| {
|
||||
let [field] = &variant.fields[..] else { return None; };
|
||||
let field_ty = field.ty(tcx, substs);
|
||||
|
||||
// Skip `_`, since that'll just lead to ambiguity.
|
||||
if self.resolve_vars_if_possible(field_ty).is_ty_var() {
|
||||
return None;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
self.lookup_probe(span, item_name, field_ty, call_expr, ProbeScope::AllTraits)
|
||||
.ok()
|
||||
.map(|pick| (variant, field, pick))
|
||||
})
|
||||
.collect();
|
||||
|
||||
let ret_ty_matches = |diagnostic_item| {
|
||||
if let Some(ret_ty) = self
|
||||
.ret_coercion
|
||||
.as_ref()
|
||||
.map(|c| self.resolve_vars_if_possible(c.borrow().expected_ty()))
|
||||
&& let ty::Adt(kind, _) = ret_ty.kind()
|
||||
&& tcx.get_diagnostic_item(diagnostic_item) == Some(kind.did())
|
||||
{
|
||||
true
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
false
|
||||
}
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
match &matching_variants[..] {
|
||||
[(_, field, pick)] => {
|
||||
let self_ty = field.ty(tcx, substs);
|
||||
err.span_note(
|
||||
tcx.def_span(pick.item.def_id),
|
||||
&format!("the method `{item_name}` exists on the type `{self_ty}`"),
|
||||
);
|
||||
let (article, kind, variant, question) =
|
||||
if Some(kind.did()) == tcx.get_diagnostic_item(sym::Result) {
|
||||
("a", "Result", "Err", ret_ty_matches(sym::Result))
|
||||
} else if Some(kind.did()) == tcx.get_diagnostic_item(sym::Option) {
|
||||
("an", "Option", "None", ret_ty_matches(sym::Option))
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
return;
|
||||
};
|
||||
if question {
|
||||
err.span_suggestion_verbose(
|
||||
expr.span.shrink_to_hi(),
|
||||
format!(
|
||||
"use the `?` operator to extract the `{self_ty}` value, propagating \
|
||||
{article} `{kind}::{variant}` value to the caller"
|
||||
),
|
||||
"?".to_owned(),
|
||||
Applicability::MachineApplicable,
|
||||
);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
err.span_suggestion_verbose(
|
||||
expr.span.shrink_to_hi(),
|
||||
format!(
|
||||
"consider using `{kind}::expect` to unwrap the `{self_ty}` value, \
|
||||
panicking if the value is {article} `{kind}::{variant}`"
|
||||
),
|
||||
".expect(\"REASON\")".to_owned(),
|
||||
Applicability::HasPlaceholders,
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
// FIXME(compiler-errors): Support suggestions for other matching enum variants
|
||||
_ => {}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pub(crate) fn note_unmet_impls_on_type(
|
||||
&self,
|
||||
err: &mut Diagnostic,
|
||||
|
@ -1662,13 +1765,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> FnCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
|
|||
(self.tcx.mk_mut_ref(self.tcx.lifetimes.re_erased, rcvr_ty), "&mut "),
|
||||
(self.tcx.mk_imm_ref(self.tcx.lifetimes.re_erased, rcvr_ty), "&"),
|
||||
] {
|
||||
match self.lookup_probe(
|
||||
span,
|
||||
item_name,
|
||||
*rcvr_ty,
|
||||
rcvr,
|
||||
crate::check::method::probe::ProbeScope::AllTraits,
|
||||
) {
|
||||
match self.lookup_probe(span, item_name, *rcvr_ty, rcvr, ProbeScope::AllTraits) {
|
||||
Ok(pick) => {
|
||||
// If the method is defined for the receiver we have, it likely wasn't `use`d.
|
||||
// We point at the method, but we just skip the rest of the check for arbitrary
|
||||
|
@ -1700,13 +1797,15 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> FnCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
|
|||
(self.tcx.mk_diagnostic_item(*rcvr_ty, sym::Arc), "Arc::new"),
|
||||
(self.tcx.mk_diagnostic_item(*rcvr_ty, sym::Rc), "Rc::new"),
|
||||
] {
|
||||
if let Some(new_rcvr_t) = *rcvr_ty && let Ok(pick) = self.lookup_probe(
|
||||
span,
|
||||
item_name,
|
||||
new_rcvr_t,
|
||||
rcvr,
|
||||
crate::check::method::probe::ProbeScope::AllTraits,
|
||||
) {
|
||||
if let Some(new_rcvr_t) = *rcvr_ty
|
||||
&& let Ok(pick) = self.lookup_probe(
|
||||
span,
|
||||
item_name,
|
||||
new_rcvr_t,
|
||||
rcvr,
|
||||
ProbeScope::AllTraits,
|
||||
)
|
||||
{
|
||||
debug!("try_alt_rcvr: pick candidate {:?}", pick);
|
||||
let did = Some(pick.item.container.id());
|
||||
// We don't want to suggest a container type when the missing
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue