Detect stricter constraints on gats where clauses in impls vs trait

This commit is contained in:
jackh726 2021-08-25 13:43:00 -04:00
parent fdf65053e9
commit af9de99f12
8 changed files with 153 additions and 50 deletions

View file

@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
use crate::infer::error_reporting::nice_region_error::NiceRegionError;
use crate::infer::lexical_region_resolve::RegionResolutionError;
use crate::infer::{Subtype, ValuePairs};
use crate::infer::{SubregionOrigin, Subtype, ValuePairs};
use crate::traits::ObligationCauseCode::CompareImplMethodObligation;
use rustc_errors::ErrorReported;
use rustc_hir as hir;
@ -11,44 +11,52 @@ use rustc_hir::def_id::DefId;
use rustc_hir::intravisit::Visitor;
use rustc_middle::ty::error::ExpectedFound;
use rustc_middle::ty::{self, Ty, TyCtxt};
use rustc_span::{MultiSpan, Span};
use rustc_span::{MultiSpan, Span, Symbol};
impl<'a, 'tcx> NiceRegionError<'a, 'tcx> {
/// Print the error message for lifetime errors when the `impl` doesn't conform to the `trait`.
pub(super) fn try_report_impl_not_conforming_to_trait(&self) -> Option<ErrorReported> {
if let Some(ref error) = self.error {
debug!("try_report_impl_not_conforming_to_trait {:?}", error);
if let RegionResolutionError::SubSupConflict(
_,
var_origin,
sub_origin,
_sub,
sup_origin,
_sup,
) = error.clone()
{
if let (&Subtype(ref sup_trace), &Subtype(ref sub_trace)) =
(&sup_origin, &sub_origin)
let error = self.error.as_ref()?;
debug!("try_report_impl_not_conforming_to_trait {:?}", error);
if let RegionResolutionError::SubSupConflict(
_,
var_origin,
sub_origin,
_sub,
sup_origin,
_sup,
) = error.clone()
{
if let (&Subtype(ref sup_trace), &Subtype(ref sub_trace)) = (&sup_origin, &sub_origin) {
if let (
ValuePairs::Types(sub_expected_found),
ValuePairs::Types(sup_expected_found),
CompareImplMethodObligation { trait_item_def_id, .. },
) = (&sub_trace.values, &sup_trace.values, &sub_trace.cause.code)
{
if let (
ValuePairs::Types(sub_expected_found),
ValuePairs::Types(sup_expected_found),
CompareImplMethodObligation { trait_item_def_id, .. },
) = (&sub_trace.values, &sup_trace.values, &sub_trace.cause.code)
{
if sup_expected_found == sub_expected_found {
self.emit_err(
var_origin.span(),
sub_expected_found.expected,
sub_expected_found.found,
*trait_item_def_id,
);
return Some(ErrorReported);
}
if sup_expected_found == sub_expected_found {
self.emit_err(
var_origin.span(),
sub_expected_found.expected,
sub_expected_found.found,
*trait_item_def_id,
);
return Some(ErrorReported);
}
}
}
}
if let RegionResolutionError::ConcreteFailure(origin, _, _) = error.clone() {
if let SubregionOrigin::CompareImplTypeObligation {
span,
item_name,
impl_item_def_id,
trait_item_def_id,
} = origin
{
self.emit_associated_type_err(span, item_name, impl_item_def_id, trait_item_def_id);
}
}
None
}
@ -107,6 +115,25 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> NiceRegionError<'a, 'tcx> {
}
err.emit();
}
fn emit_associated_type_err(
&self,
span: Span,
item_name: Symbol,
impl_item_def_id: DefId,
trait_item_def_id: DefId,
) {
let impl_sp = self.tcx().def_span(impl_item_def_id);
let trait_sp = self.tcx().def_span(trait_item_def_id);
let mut err = self
.tcx()
.sess
.struct_span_err(span, &format!("`impl` associated type signature for `{}` doesn't match `trait` associated type signature", item_name));
err.span_label(impl_sp, &format!("found"));
err.span_label(trait_sp, &format!("expected"));
err.emit();
}
}
struct TypeParamSpanVisitor<'tcx> {

View file

@ -99,6 +99,12 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> InferCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
"...so that the definition in impl matches the definition from the trait",
);
}
infer::CompareImplTypeObligation { span, .. } => {
label_or_note(
span,
"...so that the definition in impl matches the definition from the trait",
);
}
}
}
@ -356,6 +362,18 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> InferCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
trait_item_def_id,
&format!("`{}: {}`", sup, sub),
),
infer::CompareImplTypeObligation {
span,
item_name,
impl_item_def_id,
trait_item_def_id,
} => self.report_extra_impl_obligation(
span,
item_name,
impl_item_def_id,
trait_item_def_id,
&format!("`{}: {}`", sup, sub),
),
}
}

View file

@ -427,6 +427,15 @@ pub enum SubregionOrigin<'tcx> {
impl_item_def_id: DefId,
trait_item_def_id: DefId,
},
/// Comparing the signature and requirements of an impl associated type
/// against the containing trait
CompareImplTypeObligation {
span: Span,
item_name: Symbol,
impl_item_def_id: DefId,
trait_item_def_id: DefId,
},
}
// `SubregionOrigin` is used a lot. Make sure it doesn't unintentionally get bigger.
@ -1810,6 +1819,7 @@ impl<'tcx> SubregionOrigin<'tcx> {
ReferenceOutlivesReferent(_, a) => a,
CallReturn(a) => a,
CompareImplMethodObligation { span, .. } => span,
CompareImplTypeObligation { span, .. } => span,
}
}
@ -1833,6 +1843,17 @@ impl<'tcx> SubregionOrigin<'tcx> {
trait_item_def_id,
},
traits::ObligationCauseCode::CompareImplTypeObligation {
item_name,
impl_item_def_id,
trait_item_def_id,
} => SubregionOrigin::CompareImplTypeObligation {
span: cause.span,
item_name,
impl_item_def_id,
trait_item_def_id,
},
_ => default(),
}
}