slightly cleaner, if more verbose, vtable handling in codegen backends
This commit is contained in:
parent
3dad266f40
commit
adf6d37d83
3 changed files with 28 additions and 22 deletions
|
@ -240,13 +240,6 @@ impl<'ll, 'tcx> ConstMethods<'tcx> for CodegenCx<'ll, 'tcx> {
|
|||
}
|
||||
Scalar::Ptr(ptr, _size) => {
|
||||
let (alloc_id, offset) = ptr.into_parts();
|
||||
// For vtables, get the underlying data allocation.
|
||||
let alloc_id = match self.tcx.global_alloc(alloc_id) {
|
||||
GlobalAlloc::VTable(ty, trait_ref) => {
|
||||
self.tcx.vtable_allocation((ty, trait_ref))
|
||||
}
|
||||
_ => alloc_id,
|
||||
};
|
||||
let (base_addr, base_addr_space) = match self.tcx.global_alloc(alloc_id) {
|
||||
GlobalAlloc::Memory(alloc) => {
|
||||
let init = const_alloc_to_llvm(self, alloc);
|
||||
|
@ -264,7 +257,15 @@ impl<'ll, 'tcx> ConstMethods<'tcx> for CodegenCx<'ll, 'tcx> {
|
|||
self.get_fn_addr(fn_instance.polymorphize(self.tcx)),
|
||||
self.data_layout().instruction_address_space,
|
||||
),
|
||||
GlobalAlloc::VTable(..) => bug!("vtables are already handled"),
|
||||
GlobalAlloc::VTable(ty, trait_ref) => {
|
||||
let alloc = self
|
||||
.tcx
|
||||
.global_alloc(self.tcx.vtable_allocation((ty, trait_ref)))
|
||||
.unwrap_memory();
|
||||
let init = const_alloc_to_llvm(self, alloc);
|
||||
let value = self.static_addr_of(init, alloc.inner().align, None);
|
||||
(value, AddressSpace::DATA)
|
||||
}
|
||||
GlobalAlloc::Static(def_id) => {
|
||||
assert!(self.tcx.is_static(def_id));
|
||||
assert!(!self.tcx.is_thread_local_static(def_id));
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue