coverage: Rename the run-coverage test mode to coverage-run

This makes it more consistent with the `coverage-map` mode and the shared
`tests/coverage` test directory.

tests/coverage-run-rustdoc/doctest.rs

@@ -0,0 +1,101 @@
+// aux-build:doctest_crate.rs
+
+//! This test ensures that code from doctests is properly re-mapped.
+//! See <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/79417> for more info.
+//!
+//! Just some random code:
+//! ```
+//! if true {
+//!     // this is executed!
+//!     assert_eq!(1, 1);
+//! } else {
+//!     // this is not!
+//!     assert_eq!(1, 2);
+//! }
+//! ```
+//!
+//! doctest testing external code:
+//! ```
+//! extern crate doctest_crate;
+//! doctest_crate::fn_run_in_doctests(1);
+//! ```
+//!
+//! doctest returning a result:
+//! ```
+//! #[derive(Debug, PartialEq)]
+//! struct SomeError {
+//!     msg: String,
+//! }
+//! let mut res = Err(SomeError { msg: String::from("a message") });
+//! if res.is_ok() {
+//!     res?;
+//! } else {
+//!     if *res.as_ref().unwrap_err() == *res.as_ref().unwrap_err() {
+//!         println!("{:?}", res);
+//!     }
+//!     if *res.as_ref().unwrap_err() == *res.as_ref().unwrap_err() {
+//!         res = Ok(1);
+//!     }
+//!     res = Ok(0);
+//! }
+//! // need to be explicit because rustdoc cant infer the return type
+//! Ok::<(), SomeError>(())
+//! ```
+//!
+//! doctest with custom main:
+//! ```
+//! fn some_func() {
+//!     println!("called some_func()");
+//! }
+//!
+//! #[derive(Debug)]
+//! struct SomeError;
+//!
+//! extern crate doctest_crate;
+//!
+//! fn doctest_main() -> Result<(), SomeError> {
+//!     some_func();
+//!     doctest_crate::fn_run_in_doctests(2);
+//!     Ok(())
+//! }
+//!
+//! // this `main` is not shown as covered, as it clashes with all the other
+//! // `main` functions that were automatically generated for doctests
+//! fn main() -> Result<(), SomeError> {
+//!     doctest_main()
+//! }
+//! ```
+
+/// doctest attached to fn testing external code:
+/// ```
+/// extern crate doctest_crate;
+/// doctest_crate::fn_run_in_doctests(3);
+/// ```
+///
+fn main() {
+    if true {
+        assert_eq!(1, 1);
+    } else {
+        assert_eq!(1, 2);
+    }
+}
+
+// FIXME(Swatinem): Fix known issue that coverage code region columns need to be offset by the
+// doc comment line prefix (`///` or `//!`) and any additional indent (before or after the doc
+// comment characters). This test produces `llvm-cov show` results demonstrating the problem.
+//
+// One of the above tests now includes: `derive(Debug, PartialEq)`, producing an `llvm-cov show`
+// result with a distinct count for `Debug`, denoted by `^1`, but the caret points to the wrong
+// column. Similarly, the `if` blocks without `else` blocks show `^0`, which should point at, or
+// one character past, the `if` block's closing brace. In both cases, these are most likely off
+// by the number of characters stripped from the beginning of each doc comment line: indent
+// whitespace, if any, doc comment prefix (`//!` in this case) and (I assume) one space character
+// (?). Note, when viewing `llvm-cov show` results in `--color` mode, the column offset errors are
+// more pronounced, and show up in more places, with background color used to show some distinct
+// code regions with different coverage counts.
+//
+// NOTE: Since the doc comment line prefix may vary, one possible solution is to replace each
+// character stripped from the beginning of doc comment lines with a space. This will give coverage
+// results the correct column offsets, and I think it should compile correctly, but I don't know
+// what affect it might have on diagnostic messages from the compiler, and whether anyone would care
+// if the indentation changed. I don't know if there is a more viable solution.