bjoernager/rust
bjoernager/rust
1
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Activity

Rename AttrAnnotatedToken{Stream,Tree}.

Browse source 
These two type names are long and have long matching prefixes. I find
them hard to read, especially in combinations like
`AttrAnnotatedTokenStream::new(vec![AttrAnnotatedTokenTree::Token(..)])`.

This commit renames them as `AttrToken{Stream,Tree}`.
This commit is contained in:
Nicholas Nethercote 2022-09-09 12:44:05 +10:00
parent 890e759ffc
commit a56d345490
8 changed files with 80 additions and 84 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

6
compiler/rustc_builtin_macros/src/cfg_eval.rs
View file

@ -188,14 +188,14 @@ impl CfgEval<'_, '_> {
let orig_tokens = annotatable.to_tokens().flattened();
// Re-parse the tokens, setting the `capture_cfg` flag to save extra information
// to the captured `AttrAnnotatedTokenStream` (specifically, we capture
// `AttrAnnotatedTokenTree::AttributesData` for all occurrences of `#[cfg]` and `#[cfg_attr]`)
// to the captured `AttrTokenStream` (specifically, we capture
// `AttrTokenTree::AttributesData` for all occurrences of `#[cfg]` and `#[cfg_attr]`)
let mut parser =
rustc_parse::stream_to_parser(&self.cfg.sess.parse_sess, orig_tokens, None);
parser.capture_cfg = true;
annotatable = parse_annotatable_with(&mut parser);
// Now that we have our re-parsed `AttrAnnotatedTokenStream`, recursively configuring
// Now that we have our re-parsed `AttrTokenStream`, recursively configuring
// our attribute target will correctly the tokens as well.
flat_map_annotatable(self, annotatable)
}