bjoernager/rust
bjoernager/rust
1
Fork 0
Code Activity

Couple typo fixes in tutorial.

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Graydon Hoare 2012-01-19 23:58:33 -08:00
parent 4fc6e1802a
commit a4954eb6ce
1 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

4
doc/tutorial.md
View file

@ -225,7 +225,7 @@ fn main() {
Though it isn't apparent in all code, there is a fundamental Though it isn't apparent in all code, there is a fundamental
difference between Rust's syntax and the predecessors in this family difference between Rust's syntax and the predecessors in this family
of languages. A lot of thing that are statements in C are expressions of languages. A lot of things that are statements in C are expressions
in Rust. This allows for useless things like this (which passes in Rust. This allows for useless things like this (which passes
nil—the void type—to a function): nil—the void type—to a function):
@ -458,7 +458,7 @@ let s = "a\
Rust's set of operators contains very few surprises. The main Rust's set of operators contains very few surprises. The main
difference with C is that `++` and `--` are missing, and that the difference with C is that `++` and `--` are missing, and that the
logical binary operators have higher precedence—in C, `x & 2 > 0` logical bitwise operators have higher precedence—in C, `x & 2 > 0`
comes out as `x & (2 > 0)`, in Rust, it means `(x & 2) > 0`, which is comes out as `x & (2 > 0)`, in Rust, it means `(x & 2) > 0`, which is
more likely to be what you expect (unless you are a C veteran). more likely to be what you expect (unless you are a C veteran).