bjoernager/rust
bjoernager/rust
1
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Activity

Use more robust checks in rustc for wasm

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Alex Crichton 2021-11-01 14:32:55 -07:00
parent d2a3c24a95
commit a3b9405ae7
3 changed files with 5 additions and 5 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

4
compiler/rustc_codegen_llvm/src/builder.rs
View file

@ -769,7 +769,7 @@ impl BuilderMethods<'a, 'tcx> for Builder<'a, 'll, 'tcx> {
// we like. To ensure that LLVM picks the right instruction we choose
// the raw wasm intrinsic functions which avoid LLVM inserting all the
// other control flow automatically.
if self.sess().target.arch.starts_with("wasm32") {
if self.sess().target.is_like_wasm {
let src_ty = self.cx.val_ty(val);
if self.cx.type_kind(src_ty) != TypeKind::Vector {
let float_width = self.cx.float_width(src_ty);
@ -791,7 +791,7 @@ impl BuilderMethods<'a, 'tcx> for Builder<'a, 'll, 'tcx> {
fn fptosi(&mut self, val: &'ll Value, dest_ty: &'ll Type) -> &'ll Value {
// see `fptoui` above for why wasm is different here
if self.sess().target.arch.starts_with("wasm") {
if self.sess().target.is_like_wasm {
let src_ty = self.cx.val_ty(val);
if self.cx.type_kind(src_ty) != TypeKind::Vector {
let float_width = self.cx.float_width(src_ty);