Change Search::infcx
to tcx
.
Because the `infcx` isn't needed. This removes one lifetime from `Search`.
This commit is contained in:
parent
788ddedb0d
commit
9e76fcc468
1 changed files with 10 additions and 14 deletions
|
@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ pub fn search_for_structural_match_violation<'tcx>(
|
|||
) -> Option<NonStructuralMatchTy<'tcx>> {
|
||||
// FIXME: we should instead pass in an `infcx` from the outside.
|
||||
tcx.infer_ctxt().enter(|infcx| {
|
||||
ty.visit_with(&mut Search { infcx, span, seen: FxHashSet::default() }).break_value()
|
||||
ty.visit_with(&mut Search { tcx: infcx.tcx, span, seen: FxHashSet::default() }).break_value()
|
||||
})
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -114,27 +114,23 @@ fn type_marked_structural<'tcx>(
|
|||
/// This implements the traversal over the structure of a given type to try to
|
||||
/// find instances of ADTs (specifically structs or enums) that do not implement
|
||||
/// the structural-match traits (`StructuralPartialEq` and `StructuralEq`).
|
||||
struct Search<'a, 'tcx> {
|
||||
struct Search<'tcx> {
|
||||
span: Span,
|
||||
|
||||
infcx: InferCtxt<'a, 'tcx>,
|
||||
tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>,
|
||||
|
||||
/// Tracks ADTs previously encountered during search, so that
|
||||
/// we will not recur on them again.
|
||||
seen: FxHashSet<hir::def_id::DefId>,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl<'a, 'tcx> Search<'a, 'tcx> {
|
||||
fn tcx(&self) -> TyCtxt<'tcx> {
|
||||
self.infcx.tcx
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl<'tcx> Search<'tcx> {
|
||||
fn type_marked_structural(&self, adt_ty: Ty<'tcx>) -> bool {
|
||||
adt_ty.is_structural_eq_shallow(self.tcx())
|
||||
adt_ty.is_structural_eq_shallow(self.tcx)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl<'a, 'tcx> TypeVisitor<'tcx> for Search<'a, 'tcx> {
|
||||
impl<'tcx> TypeVisitor<'tcx> for Search<'tcx> {
|
||||
type BreakTy = NonStructuralMatchTy<'tcx>;
|
||||
|
||||
fn visit_ty(&mut self, ty: Ty<'tcx>) -> ControlFlow<Self::BreakTy> {
|
||||
|
@ -193,7 +189,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> TypeVisitor<'tcx> for Search<'a, 'tcx> {
|
|||
return ControlFlow::CONTINUE;
|
||||
}
|
||||
ty::Array(_, n)
|
||||
if { n.try_eval_usize(self.tcx(), ty::ParamEnv::reveal_all()) == Some(0) } =>
|
||||
if { n.try_eval_usize(self.tcx, ty::ParamEnv::reveal_all()) == Some(0) } =>
|
||||
{
|
||||
// rust-lang/rust#62336: ignore type of contents
|
||||
// for empty array.
|
||||
|
@ -214,7 +210,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> TypeVisitor<'tcx> for Search<'a, 'tcx> {
|
|||
bug!("unexpected type during structural-match checking: {:?}", ty);
|
||||
}
|
||||
ty::Error(_) => {
|
||||
self.tcx().sess.delay_span_bug(self.span, "ty::Error in structural-match check");
|
||||
self.tcx.sess.delay_span_bug(self.span, "ty::Error in structural-match check");
|
||||
// We still want to check other types after encountering an error,
|
||||
// as this may still emit relevant errors.
|
||||
return ControlFlow::CONTINUE;
|
||||
|
@ -244,9 +240,9 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> TypeVisitor<'tcx> for Search<'a, 'tcx> {
|
|||
|
||||
// even though we skip super_visit_with, we must recur on
|
||||
// fields of ADT.
|
||||
let tcx = self.tcx();
|
||||
let tcx = self.tcx;
|
||||
adt_def.all_fields().map(|field| field.ty(tcx, substs)).try_for_each(|field_ty| {
|
||||
let ty = self.tcx().normalize_erasing_regions(ty::ParamEnv::empty(), field_ty);
|
||||
let ty = self.tcx.normalize_erasing_regions(ty::ParamEnv::empty(), field_ty);
|
||||
debug!("structural-match ADT: field_ty={:?}, ty={:?}", field_ty, ty);
|
||||
ty.visit_with(self)
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue