Auto merge of #122240 - RalfJung:miri-addr-reuse, r=oli-obk

miri: add some chance to reuse addresses of previously freed allocations

The hope is that this can help us find ABA issues.

Unfortunately this needs rustc changes so I can't easily run the regular benchmark suite. I used `src/tools/miri/tests/pass/float_nan.rs` as a substitute:
```
Before:
Benchmark 1: ./x.py run miri --stage 0 --args src/tools/miri/tests/pass/float_nan.rs --args --edition=2021
  Time (mean ± σ):      9.570 s ±  0.013 s    [User: 9.279 s, System: 0.290 s]
  Range (min … max):    9.561 s …  9.579 s    2 runs

After:
Benchmark 1: ./x.py run miri --stage 0 --args src/tools/miri/tests/pass/float_nan.rs --args --edition=2021
  Time (mean ± σ):      9.698 s ±  0.046 s    [User: 9.413 s, System: 0.279 s]
  Range (min … max):    9.666 s …  9.731 s    2 runs
```
That's a ~1.3% slowdown, which seems fine to me. I have seen a lot of noise in this style of benchmarking so I don't quite trust this anyway; we can make further experiments in the Miri repo after this migrated there.

r? `@oli-obk`

compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/interpret/machine.rs

@@ -443,7 +443,8 @@ pub trait Machine<'mir, 'tcx: 'mir>: Sized {
         _machine: &mut Self,
         _alloc_extra: &mut Self::AllocExtra,
         _prov: (AllocId, Self::ProvenanceExtra),
-        _range: AllocRange,
+        _size: Size,
+        _align: Align,
     ) -> InterpResult<'tcx> {
         Ok(())
     }

compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/interpret/memory.rs

@@ -353,7 +353,8 @@ impl<'mir, 'tcx: 'mir, M: Machine<'mir, 'tcx>> InterpCx<'mir, 'tcx, M> {
             &mut self.machine,
             &mut alloc.extra,
             (alloc_id, prov),
-            alloc_range(Size::ZERO, size),
+            size,
+            alloc.align,
         )?;
 
         // Don't forget to remember size and align of this now-dead allocation