Introduce default_field_values feature

Initial implementation of `#[feature(default_field_values]`, proposed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3681.

Support default fields in enum struct variant

Allow default values in an enum struct variant definition:

```rust
pub enum Bar {
    Foo {
        bar: S = S,
        baz: i32 = 42 + 3,
    }
}
```

Allow using `..` without a base on an enum struct variant

```rust
Bar::Foo { .. }
```

`#[derive(Default)]` doesn't account for these as it is still gating `#[default]` only being allowed on unit variants.

Support `#[derive(Default)]` on enum struct variants with all defaulted fields

```rust
pub enum Bar {
    #[default]
    Foo {
        bar: S = S,
        baz: i32 = 42 + 3,
    }
}
```

Check for missing fields in typeck instead of mir_build.

Expand test with `const` param case (needs `generic_const_exprs` enabled).

Properly instantiate MIR const

The following works:

```rust
struct S<A> {
    a: Vec<A> = Vec::new(),
}
S::<i32> { .. }
```

Add lint for default fields that will always fail const-eval

We *allow* this to happen for API writers that might want to rely on users'
getting a compile error when using the default field, different to the error
that they would get when the field isn't default. We could change this to
*always* error instead of being a lint, if we wanted.

This will *not* catch errors for partially evaluated consts, like when the
expression relies on a const parameter.

Suggestions when encountering `Foo { .. }` without `#[feature(default_field_values)]`:

 - Suggest adding a base expression if there are missing fields.
 - Suggest enabling the feature if all the missing fields have optional values.
 - Suggest removing `..` if there are no missing fields.
This commit is contained in:
Esteban Küber 2024-08-24 17:22:48 +00:00
parent f6cb952dc1
commit 9ac95c10c0
70 changed files with 1469 additions and 392 deletions

View file

@ -3533,7 +3533,7 @@ impl<'a> Parser<'a> {
let exp_span = self.prev_token.span;
// We permit `.. }` on the left-hand side of a destructuring assignment.
if self.check(&token::CloseDelim(close_delim)) {
base = ast::StructRest::Rest(self.prev_token.span.shrink_to_hi());
base = ast::StructRest::Rest(self.prev_token.span);
break;
}
match self.parse_expr() {