1
Fork 0

Rollup merge of #138594 - oli-obk:no-select, r=lcnr

Fix next solver handling of shallow trait impl check

I'm trying to remove unnecessary direct calls to `select`, and this one seemed like a good place to start 😆

r? `@compiler-errors` or `@lcnr`
This commit is contained in:
Matthias Krüger 2025-03-19 16:52:57 +01:00 committed by GitHub
commit 9ab2a0e353
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: B5690EEEBB952194
6 changed files with 86 additions and 22 deletions

View file

@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ use tracing::instrument;
use crate::infer::at::ToTrace;
use crate::traits::query::evaluate_obligation::InferCtxtExt as _;
use crate::traits::{self, Obligation, ObligationCause, ObligationCtxt, SelectionContext};
use crate::traits::{self, Obligation, ObligationCause, ObligationCtxt};
#[extension(pub trait InferCtxtExt<'tcx>)]
impl<'tcx> InferCtxt<'tcx> {
@ -122,9 +122,6 @@ impl<'tcx> InferCtxt<'tcx> {
/// - If this returns `Some([errors..])`, then the trait has an impl for
/// the self type, but some nested obligations do not hold.
/// - If this returns `None`, no implementation that applies could be found.
///
/// FIXME(-Znext-solver): Due to the recursive nature of the new solver,
/// this will probably only ever return `Some([])` or `None`.
fn type_implements_trait_shallow(
&self,
trait_def_id: DefId,
@ -132,20 +129,29 @@ impl<'tcx> InferCtxt<'tcx> {
param_env: ty::ParamEnv<'tcx>,
) -> Option<Vec<traits::FulfillmentError<'tcx>>> {
self.probe(|_snapshot| {
let mut selcx = SelectionContext::new(self);
match selcx.select(&Obligation::new(
let ocx = ObligationCtxt::new_with_diagnostics(self);
ocx.register_obligation(Obligation::new(
self.tcx,
ObligationCause::dummy(),
param_env,
ty::TraitRef::new(self.tcx, trait_def_id, [ty]),
)) {
Ok(Some(selection)) => {
let ocx = ObligationCtxt::new_with_diagnostics(self);
ocx.register_obligations(selection.nested_obligations());
Some(ocx.select_all_or_error())
));
let errors = ocx.select_where_possible();
// Find the original predicate in the list of predicates that could definitely not be fulfilled.
// If it is in that list, then we know this doesn't even shallowly implement the trait.
// If it is not in that list, it was fulfilled, but there may be nested obligations, which we don't care about here.
for error in &errors {
let Some(trait_clause) = error.obligation.predicate.as_trait_clause() else {
continue;
};
let Some(bound_ty) = trait_clause.self_ty().no_bound_vars() else { continue };
if trait_clause.def_id() == trait_def_id
&& ocx.eq(&ObligationCause::dummy(), param_env, bound_ty, ty).is_ok()
{
return None;
}
Ok(None) | Err(_) => None,
}
Some(errors)
})
}
}

View file

@ -1,16 +1,17 @@
//@ run-rustfix
//@ revisions: current next
//@[next] compile-flags: -Znext-solver
#![allow(unused_variables, dead_code)]
use std::collections::BTreeMap;
use std::collections::HashSet;
use std::collections::{BTreeMap, HashSet};
#[derive(Debug,Eq,PartialEq,Hash)]
#[derive(Debug, Eq, PartialEq, Hash)]
#[derive(Clone)]
enum Day {
Mon,
}
struct Class {
days: BTreeMap<u32, HashSet<Day>>
days: BTreeMap<u32, HashSet<Day>>,
}
impl Class {

View file

@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> $DIR/assignment-of-clone-call-on-ref-due-to-missing-bound.rs:18:39
--> $DIR/assignment-of-clone-call-on-ref-due-to-missing-bound.rs:19:39
|
LL | let mut x: HashSet<Day> = v.clone();
| ------------ ^^^^^^^^^ expected `HashSet<Day>`, found `&HashSet<Day>`
@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ LL | let mut x: HashSet<Day> = v.clone();
= note: expected struct `HashSet<_>`
found reference `&HashSet<_>`
note: `HashSet<Day>` does not implement `Clone`, so `&HashSet<Day>` was cloned instead
--> $DIR/assignment-of-clone-call-on-ref-due-to-missing-bound.rs:18:39
--> $DIR/assignment-of-clone-call-on-ref-due-to-missing-bound.rs:19:39
|
LL | let mut x: HashSet<Day> = v.clone();
| ^

View file

@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
//@ run-rustfix
//@ revisions: current next
//@[next] compile-flags: -Znext-solver
#![allow(unused_variables, dead_code)]
use std::collections::{BTreeMap, HashSet};
#[derive(Debug, Eq, PartialEq, Hash)]
#[derive(Clone)]
enum Day {
Mon,
}
struct Class {
days: BTreeMap<u32, HashSet<Day>>,
}
impl Class {
fn do_stuff(&self) {
for (_, v) in &self.days {
let mut x: HashSet<Day> = v.clone(); //~ ERROR
let y: Vec<Day> = x.drain().collect();
println!("{:?}", x);
}
}
}
fn fail() {
let c = Class { days: BTreeMap::new() };
c.do_stuff();
}
fn main() {}

View file

@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> $DIR/assignment-of-clone-call-on-ref-due-to-missing-bound.rs:19:39
|
LL | let mut x: HashSet<Day> = v.clone();
| ------------ ^^^^^^^^^ expected `HashSet<Day>`, found `&HashSet<Day>`
| |
| expected due to this
|
= note: expected struct `HashSet<_>`
found reference `&HashSet<_>`
note: `HashSet<Day>` does not implement `Clone`, so `&HashSet<Day>` was cloned instead
--> $DIR/assignment-of-clone-call-on-ref-due-to-missing-bound.rs:19:39
|
LL | let mut x: HashSet<Day> = v.clone();
| ^
= help: `Clone` is not implemented because the trait bound `Day: Clone` is not satisfied
help: consider annotating `Day` with `#[derive(Clone)]`
|
LL + #[derive(Clone)]
LL | enum Day {
|
error: aborting due to 1 previous error
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0308`.

View file

@ -1,15 +1,16 @@
//@ run-rustfix
//@ revisions: current next
//@[next] compile-flags: -Znext-solver
#![allow(unused_variables, dead_code)]
use std::collections::BTreeMap;
use std::collections::HashSet;
use std::collections::{BTreeMap, HashSet};
#[derive(Debug,Eq,PartialEq,Hash)]
#[derive(Debug, Eq, PartialEq, Hash)]
enum Day {
Mon,
}
struct Class {
days: BTreeMap<u32, HashSet<Day>>
days: BTreeMap<u32, HashSet<Day>>,
}
impl Class {