1
Fork 0

Auto merge of #102056 - b-naber:unevaluated, r=lcnr

Introduce mir::Unevaluated

Previously the distinction between unevaluated constants in the type-system and in mir was not explicit and a little confusing. Probably better to introduce its own type for that.

r? `@lcnr`
This commit is contained in:
bors 2022-09-23 13:39:11 +00:00
commit 9a963e3bad
38 changed files with 220 additions and 156 deletions

View file

@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
use rustc_errors::{fluent, ErrorGuaranteed, Handler, IntoDiagnostic};
use rustc_macros::Diagnostic;
use rustc_middle::ty::{PolyTraitRef, Ty, Unevaluated};
use rustc_middle::ty::{self, PolyTraitRef, Ty};
use rustc_session::Limit;
use rustc_span::{Span, Symbol};
@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ pub struct DumpVTableEntries<'a> {
pub struct UnableToConstructConstantValue<'a> {
#[primary_span]
pub span: Span,
pub unevaluated: Unevaluated<'a>,
pub unevaluated: ty::UnevaluatedConst<'a>,
}
#[derive(Diagnostic)]

View file

@ -834,7 +834,7 @@ impl<'tcx> AutoTraitFinder<'tcx> {
let reported =
tcx.sess.emit_err(UnableToConstructConstantValue {
span: tcx.def_span(def_id),
unevaluated: unevaluated.expand(),
unevaluated: unevaluated,
});
Err(ErrorHandled::Reported(reported))
}

View file

@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ impl<'tcx> ConstUnifyCtxt<'tcx> {
#[instrument(skip(tcx), level = "debug")]
pub fn try_unify_abstract_consts<'tcx>(
tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>,
(a, b): (ty::Unevaluated<'tcx, ()>, ty::Unevaluated<'tcx, ()>),
(a, b): (ty::UnevaluatedConst<'tcx>, ty::UnevaluatedConst<'tcx>),
param_env: ty::ParamEnv<'tcx>,
) -> bool {
(|| {
@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ pub fn try_unify_abstract_consts<'tcx>(
#[instrument(skip(infcx), level = "debug")]
pub fn is_const_evaluatable<'cx, 'tcx>(
infcx: &InferCtxt<'cx, 'tcx>,
uv: ty::Unevaluated<'tcx, ()>,
uv: ty::UnevaluatedConst<'tcx>,
param_env: ty::ParamEnv<'tcx>,
span: Span,
) -> Result<(), NotConstEvaluatable> {

View file

@ -838,7 +838,10 @@ fn contains_illegal_self_type_reference<'tcx, T: TypeVisitable<'tcx>>(
}
}
fn visit_unevaluated(&mut self, uv: ty::Unevaluated<'tcx>) -> ControlFlow<Self::BreakTy> {
fn visit_ty_unevaluated(
&mut self,
uv: ty::UnevaluatedConst<'tcx>,
) -> ControlFlow<Self::BreakTy> {
// Constants can only influence object safety if they reference `Self`.
// This is only possible for unevaluated constants, so we walk these here.
//
@ -852,7 +855,7 @@ fn contains_illegal_self_type_reference<'tcx, T: TypeVisitable<'tcx>>(
// This shouldn't really matter though as we can't really use any
// constants which are not considered const evaluatable.
use rustc_middle::ty::abstract_const::Node;
if let Ok(Some(ct)) = AbstractConst::new(self.tcx, uv.shrink()) {
if let Ok(Some(ct)) = AbstractConst::new(self.tcx, uv) {
walk_abstract_const(self.tcx, ct, |node| match node.root(self.tcx) {
Node::Leaf(leaf) => self.visit_const(leaf),
Node::Cast(_, _, ty) => self.visit_ty(ty),

View file

@ -2141,7 +2141,7 @@ fn confirm_impl_candidate<'cx, 'tcx>(
let identity_substs =
crate::traits::InternalSubsts::identity_for_item(tcx, assoc_ty.item.def_id);
let did = ty::WithOptConstParam::unknown(assoc_ty.item.def_id);
let kind = ty::ConstKind::Unevaluated(ty::Unevaluated::new(did, identity_substs));
let kind = ty::ConstKind::Unevaluated(ty::UnevaluatedConst::new(did, identity_substs));
ty.map_bound(|ty| tcx.mk_const(ty::ConstS { ty, kind }).into())
} else {
ty.map_bound(|ty| ty.into())