Rollup merge of #116261 - lcnr:wf-only-clause, r=davidtwco
a small wf and clause cleanup - remove `Clause::from_projection_clause`, instead use `ToPredicate` - change `predicate_obligations` to directly take a `Clause` - remove some unnecessary `&` - use clause in `min_specialization` checks where easily applicable
This commit is contained in:
commit
8efbc2cbae
9 changed files with 81 additions and 101 deletions
|
@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ use rustc_infer::traits::util;
|
|||
use rustc_middle::ty::error::{ExpectedFound, TypeError};
|
||||
use rustc_middle::ty::fold::BottomUpFolder;
|
||||
use rustc_middle::ty::util::ExplicitSelf;
|
||||
use rustc_middle::ty::ToPredicate;
|
||||
use rustc_middle::ty::{
|
||||
self, GenericArgs, Ty, TypeFoldable, TypeFolder, TypeSuperFoldable, TypeVisitableExt,
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
@ -2279,16 +2280,16 @@ pub(super) fn check_type_bounds<'tcx>(
|
|||
//
|
||||
// impl<T> X for T where T: X { type Y = <T as X>::Y; }
|
||||
}
|
||||
_ => predicates.push(ty::Clause::from_projection_clause(
|
||||
tcx,
|
||||
_ => predicates.push(
|
||||
ty::Binder::bind_with_vars(
|
||||
ty::ProjectionPredicate {
|
||||
projection_ty: tcx.mk_alias_ty(trait_ty.def_id, rebased_args),
|
||||
term: normalize_impl_ty.into(),
|
||||
},
|
||||
bound_vars,
|
||||
),
|
||||
)),
|
||||
)
|
||||
.to_predicate(tcx),
|
||||
),
|
||||
};
|
||||
ty::ParamEnv::new(tcx.mk_clauses(&predicates), Reveal::UserFacing)
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -1130,11 +1130,11 @@ fn check_associated_type_bounds(wfcx: &WfCheckingCtxt<'_, '_>, item: ty::AssocIt
|
|||
let wf_obligations =
|
||||
bounds.instantiate_identity_iter_copied().flat_map(|(bound, bound_span)| {
|
||||
let normalized_bound = wfcx.normalize(span, None, bound);
|
||||
traits::wf::predicate_obligations(
|
||||
traits::wf::clause_obligations(
|
||||
wfcx.infcx,
|
||||
wfcx.param_env,
|
||||
wfcx.body_def_id,
|
||||
normalized_bound.as_predicate(),
|
||||
normalized_bound,
|
||||
bound_span,
|
||||
)
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
@ -1234,7 +1234,7 @@ fn check_impl<'tcx>(
|
|||
wfcx.infcx,
|
||||
wfcx.param_env,
|
||||
wfcx.body_def_id,
|
||||
&trait_pred,
|
||||
trait_pred,
|
||||
ast_trait_ref.path.span,
|
||||
item,
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
@ -1443,13 +1443,7 @@ fn check_where_clauses<'tcx>(wfcx: &WfCheckingCtxt<'_, 'tcx>, span: Span, def_id
|
|||
debug!(?predicates.predicates);
|
||||
assert_eq!(predicates.predicates.len(), predicates.spans.len());
|
||||
let wf_obligations = predicates.into_iter().flat_map(|(p, sp)| {
|
||||
traits::wf::predicate_obligations(
|
||||
infcx,
|
||||
wfcx.param_env,
|
||||
wfcx.body_def_id,
|
||||
p.as_predicate(),
|
||||
sp,
|
||||
)
|
||||
traits::wf::clause_obligations(infcx, wfcx.param_env, wfcx.body_def_id, p, sp)
|
||||
});
|
||||
let obligations: Vec<_> = wf_obligations.chain(default_obligations).collect();
|
||||
wfcx.register_obligations(obligations);
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -376,9 +376,9 @@ fn check_predicates<'tcx>(
|
|||
let always_applicable_traits = impl1_predicates
|
||||
.iter()
|
||||
.copied()
|
||||
.filter(|(clause, _span)| {
|
||||
.filter(|&(clause, _span)| {
|
||||
matches!(
|
||||
trait_predicate_kind(tcx, clause.as_predicate()),
|
||||
trait_specialization_kind(tcx, clause),
|
||||
Some(TraitSpecializationKind::AlwaysApplicable)
|
||||
)
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
@ -402,7 +402,7 @@ fn check_predicates<'tcx>(
|
|||
.iter()
|
||||
.any(|pred2| trait_predicates_eq(tcx, clause.as_predicate(), *pred2, span))
|
||||
{
|
||||
check_specialization_on(tcx, clause.as_predicate(), span)
|
||||
check_specialization_on(tcx, clause, span)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -441,19 +441,16 @@ fn trait_predicates_eq<'tcx>(
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[instrument(level = "debug", skip(tcx))]
|
||||
fn check_specialization_on<'tcx>(tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>, predicate: ty::Predicate<'tcx>, span: Span) {
|
||||
match predicate.kind().skip_binder() {
|
||||
fn check_specialization_on<'tcx>(tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>, clause: ty::Clause<'tcx>, span: Span) {
|
||||
match clause.kind().skip_binder() {
|
||||
// Global predicates are either always true or always false, so we
|
||||
// are fine to specialize on.
|
||||
_ if predicate.is_global() => (),
|
||||
_ if clause.is_global() => (),
|
||||
// We allow specializing on explicitly marked traits with no associated
|
||||
// items.
|
||||
ty::PredicateKind::Clause(ty::ClauseKind::Trait(ty::TraitPredicate {
|
||||
trait_ref,
|
||||
polarity: _,
|
||||
})) => {
|
||||
ty::ClauseKind::Trait(ty::TraitPredicate { trait_ref, polarity: _ }) => {
|
||||
if !matches!(
|
||||
trait_predicate_kind(tcx, predicate),
|
||||
trait_specialization_kind(tcx, clause),
|
||||
Some(TraitSpecializationKind::Marker)
|
||||
) {
|
||||
tcx.sess
|
||||
|
@ -467,10 +464,7 @@ fn check_specialization_on<'tcx>(tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>, predicate: ty::Predicate<'tc
|
|||
.emit();
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
ty::PredicateKind::Clause(ty::ClauseKind::Projection(ty::ProjectionPredicate {
|
||||
projection_ty,
|
||||
term,
|
||||
})) => {
|
||||
ty::ClauseKind::Projection(ty::ProjectionPredicate { projection_ty, term }) => {
|
||||
tcx.sess
|
||||
.struct_span_err(
|
||||
span,
|
||||
|
@ -478,7 +472,7 @@ fn check_specialization_on<'tcx>(tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>, predicate: ty::Predicate<'tc
|
|||
)
|
||||
.emit();
|
||||
}
|
||||
ty::PredicateKind::Clause(ty::ClauseKind::ConstArgHasType(..)) => {
|
||||
ty::ClauseKind::ConstArgHasType(..) => {
|
||||
// FIXME(min_specialization), FIXME(const_generics):
|
||||
// It probably isn't right to allow _every_ `ConstArgHasType` but I am somewhat unsure
|
||||
// about the actual rules that would be sound. Can't just always error here because otherwise
|
||||
|
@ -490,33 +484,25 @@ fn check_specialization_on<'tcx>(tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>, predicate: ty::Predicate<'tc
|
|||
}
|
||||
_ => {
|
||||
tcx.sess
|
||||
.struct_span_err(span, format!("cannot specialize on predicate `{predicate}`"))
|
||||
.struct_span_err(span, format!("cannot specialize on predicate `{clause}`"))
|
||||
.emit();
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn trait_predicate_kind<'tcx>(
|
||||
fn trait_specialization_kind<'tcx>(
|
||||
tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>,
|
||||
predicate: ty::Predicate<'tcx>,
|
||||
clause: ty::Clause<'tcx>,
|
||||
) -> Option<TraitSpecializationKind> {
|
||||
match predicate.kind().skip_binder() {
|
||||
ty::PredicateKind::Clause(ty::ClauseKind::Trait(ty::TraitPredicate {
|
||||
trait_ref,
|
||||
polarity: _,
|
||||
})) => Some(tcx.trait_def(trait_ref.def_id).specialization_kind),
|
||||
ty::PredicateKind::Clause(ty::ClauseKind::RegionOutlives(_))
|
||||
| ty::PredicateKind::Clause(ty::ClauseKind::TypeOutlives(_))
|
||||
| ty::PredicateKind::Clause(ty::ClauseKind::Projection(_))
|
||||
| ty::PredicateKind::Clause(ty::ClauseKind::ConstArgHasType(..))
|
||||
| ty::PredicateKind::AliasRelate(..)
|
||||
| ty::PredicateKind::Clause(ty::ClauseKind::WellFormed(_))
|
||||
| ty::PredicateKind::Subtype(_)
|
||||
| ty::PredicateKind::Coerce(_)
|
||||
| ty::PredicateKind::ObjectSafe(_)
|
||||
| ty::PredicateKind::ClosureKind(..)
|
||||
| ty::PredicateKind::Clause(ty::ClauseKind::ConstEvaluatable(..))
|
||||
| ty::PredicateKind::ConstEquate(..)
|
||||
| ty::PredicateKind::Ambiguous => None,
|
||||
match clause.kind().skip_binder() {
|
||||
ty::ClauseKind::Trait(ty::TraitPredicate { trait_ref, polarity: _ }) => {
|
||||
Some(tcx.trait_def(trait_ref.def_id).specialization_kind)
|
||||
}
|
||||
ty::ClauseKind::RegionOutlives(_)
|
||||
| ty::ClauseKind::TypeOutlives(_)
|
||||
| ty::ClauseKind::Projection(_)
|
||||
| ty::ClauseKind::ConstArgHasType(..)
|
||||
| ty::ClauseKind::WellFormed(_)
|
||||
| ty::ClauseKind::ConstEvaluatable(..) => None,
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue