Remove less relevant info from diagnostic
``` error[E0277]: the trait bound `dep_2_reexport::Type: Trait` is not satisfied because the trait comes from a different crate version --> multiple-dep-versions.rs:7:18 | 7 | do_something(Type); | ^^^^ the trait `Trait` is not implemented for `dep_2_reexport::Type` | note: there are multiple different versions of crate `dependency` in the dependency graph --> /home/gh-estebank/rust/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/test/run-make/crate-loading/rmake_out/multiple-dep-versions-1.rs:4:1 | 3 | pub struct Type(pub i32); | --------------- this type implements the required trait 4 | pub trait Trait { | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ this is the required trait | ::: multiple-dep-versions.rs:1:1 | 1 | extern crate dep_2_reexport; | ---------------------------- one version of crate `dependency` is used here, as a dependency of crate `foo` 2 | extern crate dependency; | ------------------------ one version of crate `dependency` is used here, as a direct dependency of the current crate | ::: /home/gh-estebank/rust/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/test/run-make/crate-loading/rmake_out/multiple-dep-versions-2.rs:3:1 | 3 | pub struct Type; | --------------- this type doesn't implement the required trait 4 | pub trait Trait { | --------------- this is the found trait = note: two types coming from two different versions of the same crate are different types even if they look the same = help: you can use `cargo tree` to explore your dependency tree ``` The approach to accomplish this is a HACK, and we'd want a better way to do this. I believe that moving E0277 to be a structured diagnostic would help in that regard.
This commit is contained in:
parent
6fbf4441a3
commit
8a568d9f15
2 changed files with 38 additions and 26 deletions
|
@ -1796,6 +1796,24 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> TypeErrCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
|
|||
StringPart::highlighted("cargo tree".to_string()),
|
||||
StringPart::normal("` to explore your dependency tree".to_string()),
|
||||
]);
|
||||
|
||||
// FIXME: this is a giant hack for the benefit of this specific diagnostic. Because
|
||||
// we're so nested in method calls before the error gets emitted, bubbling a single bit
|
||||
// flag informing the top level caller to stop adding extra detail to the diagnostic,
|
||||
// would actually be harder to follow. So we do something naughty here: we consume the
|
||||
// diagnostic, emit it and leave in its place a "delayed bug" that will continue being
|
||||
// modified but won't actually be printed to end users. This *is not ideal*, but allows
|
||||
// us to reduce the verbosity of an error that is already quite verbose and increase its
|
||||
// specificity. Below we modify the main message as well, in a way that *could* break if
|
||||
// the implementation of Diagnostics change significantly, but that would be caught with
|
||||
// a make test failure when this diagnostic is tested.
|
||||
err.primary_message(format!(
|
||||
"{} because the trait comes from a different crate version",
|
||||
err.messages[0].0.as_str().unwrap(),
|
||||
));
|
||||
let diag = err.clone();
|
||||
err.downgrade_to_delayed_bug();
|
||||
self.tcx.dcx().emit_diagnostic(diag);
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue