Be better at reporting alias errors

compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/solve/fulfill.rs

@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ use rustc_middle::bug;
 use rustc_middle::ty::error::{ExpectedFound, TypeError};
 use rustc_middle::ty::{self, TyCtxt};
 use rustc_next_trait_solver::solve::{GenerateProofTree, HasChanged, SolverDelegateEvalExt as _};
-use tracing::instrument;
+use tracing::{instrument, trace};
 
 use super::Certainty;
 use super::delegate::SolverDelegate;
@@ -402,6 +402,7 @@ impl<'tcx> BestObligation<'tcx> {
                                         nested_goal.source(),
                                         GoalSource::ImplWhereBound
                                             | GoalSource::InstantiateHigherRanked
+                                            | GoalSource::AliasWellFormed
                                     ) && match self.consider_ambiguities {
                                         true => {
                                             matches!(
@@ -416,6 +417,13 @@ impl<'tcx> BestObligation<'tcx> {
                         })
                     });
                 }
+
+                // Prefer a non-rigid candidate if there is one.
+                if candidates.len() > 1 {
+                    candidates.retain(|candidate| {
+                        !matches!(candidate.kind(), inspect::ProbeKind::RigidAlias { .. })
+                    });
+                }
             }
         }
 
@@ -430,8 +438,11 @@ impl<'tcx> ProofTreeVisitor<'tcx> for BestObligation<'tcx> {
         self.obligation.cause.span
     }
 
+    #[instrument(level = "trace", skip(self, goal), fields(goal = ?goal.goal()))]
     fn visit_goal(&mut self, goal: &inspect::InspectGoal<'_, 'tcx>) -> Self::Result {
         let candidates = self.non_trivial_candidates(goal);
+        trace!(candidates = ?candidates.iter().map(|c| c.kind()).collect::<Vec<_>>());
+
         let [candidate] = candidates.as_slice() else {
             return ControlFlow::Break(self.obligation.clone());
         };
@@ -470,6 +481,8 @@ impl<'tcx> ProofTreeVisitor<'tcx> for BestObligation<'tcx> {
 
         let mut impl_where_bound_count = 0;
         for nested_goal in candidate.instantiate_nested_goals(self.span()) {
+            trace!(nested_goal = ?(nested_goal.goal(), nested_goal.source(), nested_goal.result()));
+
             let make_obligation = |cause| Obligation {
                 cause,
                 param_env: nested_goal.goal().param_env,
@@ -496,7 +509,7 @@ impl<'tcx> ProofTreeVisitor<'tcx> for BestObligation<'tcx> {
                 (_, GoalSource::InstantiateHigherRanked) => {
                     obligation = self.obligation.clone();
                 }
-                (ChildMode::PassThrough, _) => {
+                (ChildMode::PassThrough, _) | (_, GoalSource::AliasWellFormed) => {
                     obligation = make_obligation(self.obligation.cause.clone());
                 }
             }

compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/solve/inspect/analyse.rs

@@ -292,7 +292,8 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> InspectGoal<'a, 'tcx> {
                         | inspect::ProbeKind::Root { .. }
                         | inspect::ProbeKind::TryNormalizeNonRigid { .. }
                         | inspect::ProbeKind::TraitCandidate { .. }
-                        | inspect::ProbeKind::OpaqueTypeStorageLookup { .. } => {
+                        | inspect::ProbeKind::OpaqueTypeStorageLookup { .. }
+                        | inspect::ProbeKind::RigidAlias { .. } => {
                             // Nested probes have to prove goals added in their parent
                             // but do not leak them, so we truncate the added goals
                             // afterwards.
@@ -316,7 +317,8 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> InspectGoal<'a, 'tcx> {
             inspect::ProbeKind::Root { result }
             | inspect::ProbeKind::TryNormalizeNonRigid { result }
             | inspect::ProbeKind::TraitCandidate { source: _, result }
-            | inspect::ProbeKind::OpaqueTypeStorageLookup { result } => {
+            | inspect::ProbeKind::OpaqueTypeStorageLookup { result }
+            | inspect::ProbeKind::RigidAlias { result } => {
                 // We only add a candidate if `shallow_certainty` was set, which means
                 // that we ended up calling `evaluate_added_goals_and_make_canonical_response`.
                 if let Some(shallow_certainty) = shallow_certainty {

compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/solve/select.rs

@@ -177,7 +177,8 @@ fn to_selection<'tcx>(
         | ProbeKind::UpcastProjectionCompatibility
         | ProbeKind::OpaqueTypeStorageLookup { result: _ }
         | ProbeKind::Root { result: _ }
-        | ProbeKind::ShadowedEnvProbing => {
+        | ProbeKind::ShadowedEnvProbing
+        | ProbeKind::RigidAlias { result: _ } => {
             span_bug!(span, "didn't expect to assemble trait candidate from {:#?}", cand.kind())
         }
     })