Rollup merge of #122537 - RalfJung:interpret-allocation, r=oli-obk
interpret/allocation: fix aliasing issue in interpreter and refactor getters a bit That new raw getter will be needed to let Miri pass pointers to natively executed FFI code ("extern-so" mode). While doing that I realized our get_bytes_mut are named less scary than get_bytes_unchecked so I rectified that. Also I realized `mem_copy_repeatedly` would break if we called it for multiple overlapping copies so I made sure this does not happen. And I realized that we are actually [violating Stacked Borrows in the interpreter](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/136281-t-opsem/topic/I.20think.20Miri.20violates.20Stacked.20Borrows.20.F0.9F.99.88).^^ That was introduced in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/87777. r? ```@oli-obk```
This commit is contained in:
commit
84e55be8da
2 changed files with 45 additions and 14 deletions
|
@ -1159,11 +1159,11 @@ impl<'mir, 'tcx: 'mir, M: Machine<'mir, 'tcx>> InterpCx<'mir, 'tcx, M> {
|
|||
};
|
||||
|
||||
// Side-step AllocRef and directly access the underlying bytes more efficiently.
|
||||
// (We are staying inside the bounds here so all is good.)
|
||||
// (We are staying inside the bounds here and all bytes do get overwritten so all is good.)
|
||||
let alloc_id = alloc_ref.alloc_id;
|
||||
let bytes = alloc_ref
|
||||
.alloc
|
||||
.get_bytes_mut(&alloc_ref.tcx, alloc_ref.range)
|
||||
.get_bytes_unchecked_for_overwrite(&alloc_ref.tcx, alloc_ref.range)
|
||||
.map_err(move |e| e.to_interp_error(alloc_id))?;
|
||||
// `zip` would stop when the first iterator ends; we want to definitely
|
||||
// cover all of `bytes`.
|
||||
|
@ -1184,6 +1184,11 @@ impl<'mir, 'tcx: 'mir, M: Machine<'mir, 'tcx>> InterpCx<'mir, 'tcx, M> {
|
|||
self.mem_copy_repeatedly(src, dest, size, 1, nonoverlapping)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Performs `num_copies` many copies of `size` many bytes from `src` to `dest + i*size` (where
|
||||
/// `i` is the index of the copy).
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Either `nonoverlapping` must be true or `num_copies` must be 1; doing repeated copies that
|
||||
/// may overlap is not supported.
|
||||
pub fn mem_copy_repeatedly(
|
||||
&mut self,
|
||||
src: Pointer<Option<M::Provenance>>,
|
||||
|
@ -1245,8 +1250,9 @@ impl<'mir, 'tcx: 'mir, M: Machine<'mir, 'tcx>> InterpCx<'mir, 'tcx, M> {
|
|||
(dest_alloc_id, dest_prov),
|
||||
dest_range,
|
||||
)?;
|
||||
// Yes we do overwrite all bytes in `dest_bytes`.
|
||||
let dest_bytes = dest_alloc
|
||||
.get_bytes_mut_ptr(&tcx, dest_range)
|
||||
.get_bytes_unchecked_for_overwrite_ptr(&tcx, dest_range)
|
||||
.map_err(|e| e.to_interp_error(dest_alloc_id))?
|
||||
.as_mut_ptr();
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -1280,6 +1286,9 @@ impl<'mir, 'tcx: 'mir, M: Machine<'mir, 'tcx>> InterpCx<'mir, 'tcx, M> {
|
|||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
if num_copies > 1 {
|
||||
assert!(nonoverlapping, "multi-copy only supported in non-overlapping mode");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
let size_in_bytes = size.bytes_usize();
|
||||
// For particularly large arrays (where this is perf-sensitive) it's common that
|
||||
|
@ -1292,6 +1301,8 @@ impl<'mir, 'tcx: 'mir, M: Machine<'mir, 'tcx>> InterpCx<'mir, 'tcx, M> {
|
|||
} else if src_alloc_id == dest_alloc_id {
|
||||
let mut dest_ptr = dest_bytes;
|
||||
for _ in 0..num_copies {
|
||||
// Here we rely on `src` and `dest` being non-overlapping if there is more than
|
||||
// one copy.
|
||||
ptr::copy(src_bytes, dest_ptr, size_in_bytes);
|
||||
dest_ptr = dest_ptr.add(size_in_bytes);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue