Rollup merge of #87529 - FabianWolff:issue-87496, r=nikomatsakis
Fix ICE in `improper_ctypes_definitions` lint with all-ZST transparent types
Fixes #87496. There is also another function in the same file that looks fishy, but I haven't been able to produce an ICE there, and in any case, it's not related to #87496:
fd853c00e2/compiler/rustc_lint/src/types.rs (L720-L734)
r? ```@JohnTitor```
This commit is contained in:
commit
81dc21699e
3 changed files with 36 additions and 2 deletions
|
@ -851,12 +851,18 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> ImproperCTypesVisitor<'a, 'tcx> {
|
|||
use FfiResult::*;
|
||||
|
||||
if def.repr.transparent() {
|
||||
// Can assume that only one field is not a ZST, so only check
|
||||
// Can assume that at most one field is not a ZST, so only check
|
||||
// that field's type for FFI-safety.
|
||||
if let Some(field) = transparent_newtype_field(self.cx.tcx, variant) {
|
||||
self.check_field_type_for_ffi(cache, field, substs)
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
bug!("malformed transparent type");
|
||||
// All fields are ZSTs; this means that the type should behave
|
||||
// like (), which is FFI-unsafe
|
||||
FfiUnsafe {
|
||||
ty,
|
||||
reason: "this struct contains only zero-sized fields".into(),
|
||||
help: None,
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
// We can't completely trust repr(C) markings; make sure the fields are
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue