1
Fork 0

Rollup merge of #81291 - sexxi-goose:fix-struct-update-functional-record-update-syntax-error, r=nikomatsakis

Support FRU pattern with `[feature(capture_disjoint_fields)]`

In case of a functional record update syntax for creating a structure, `ExprUseVisitor` to only detect the precise use of some of the field in the `..x` part of the syntax. However, when we start building MIR, we
1. First, build the place for `x`
2. and then, add precise field projections so that only some parts of `x` end up getting read.

When `capture_disjoint_fields` is enabled, and FRU is used within a closure `x` won't be completely captured, and therefore the first step will fail. This PR updates `mir_build` to create a place builder in the first step and then create place from the builder only after applying the field projection.

Closes https://github.com/rust-lang/project-rfc-2229/issues/32
r? ``````@nikomatsakis``````
This commit is contained in:
Yuki Okushi 2021-01-30 13:36:46 +09:00 committed by GitHub
commit 7fa991fb85
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23
4 changed files with 67 additions and 5 deletions

View file

@ -303,7 +303,7 @@ impl<'tcx> PlaceBuilder<'tcx> {
self.base self.base
} }
fn field(self, f: Field, ty: Ty<'tcx>) -> Self { crate fn field(self, f: Field, ty: Ty<'tcx>) -> Self {
self.project(PlaceElem::Field(f, ty)) self.project(PlaceElem::Field(f, ty))
} }

View file

@ -296,7 +296,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> Builder<'a, 'tcx> {
let field_names = this.hir.all_fields(adt_def, variant_index); let field_names = this.hir.all_fields(adt_def, variant_index);
let fields: Vec<_> = if let Some(FruInfo { base, field_types }) = base { let fields: Vec<_> = if let Some(FruInfo { base, field_types }) = base {
let base = unpack!(block = this.as_place(block, base)); let place_builder = unpack!(block = this.as_place_builder(block, base));
// MIR does not natively support FRU, so for each // MIR does not natively support FRU, so for each
// base-supplied field, generate an operand that // base-supplied field, generate an operand that
@ -306,9 +306,14 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> Builder<'a, 'tcx> {
.zip(field_types.into_iter()) .zip(field_types.into_iter())
.map(|(n, ty)| match fields_map.get(&n) { .map(|(n, ty)| match fields_map.get(&n) {
Some(v) => v.clone(), Some(v) => v.clone(),
None => this.consume_by_copy_or_move( None => {
this.hir.tcx().mk_place_field(base, n, ty), let place_builder = place_builder.clone();
), this.consume_by_copy_or_move(
place_builder
.field(n, ty)
.into_place(this.hir.tcx(), this.hir.typeck_results()),
)
},
}) })
.collect() .collect()
} else { } else {

View file

@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
// run-pass
// Test that functional record update/struct update syntax works inside
// a closure when the feature `capture_disjoint_fields` is enabled.
#![feature(capture_disjoint_fields)]
//~^ WARNING: the feature `capture_disjoint_fields` is incomplete
//~| NOTE: `#[warn(incomplete_features)]` on by default
//~| NOTE: see issue #53488 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/53488>
#[derive(Clone)]
struct S {
a: String,
b: String,
}
struct T {
a: String,
s: S,
}
fn main() {
let a = String::new();
let b = String::new();
let c = String::new();
let s = S {a, b};
let t = T {
a: c,
s: s.clone()
};
let c = || {
let s2 = S {
a: format!("New s2"),
..s
};
let s3 = S {
a: format!("New s3"),
..t.s
};
println!("{} {}", s2.a, s2.b);
println!("{} {} {}", s3.a, s3.b, t.a);
};
c();
}

View file

@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
warning: the feature `capture_disjoint_fields` is incomplete and may not be safe to use and/or cause compiler crashes
--> $DIR/fru_syntax.rs:6:12
|
LL | #![feature(capture_disjoint_fields)]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
= note: `#[warn(incomplete_features)]` on by default
= note: see issue #53488 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/53488> for more information
warning: 1 warning emitted