Add pretty, ui, and feature-gate tests for the enzyme/autodiff frontend

This commit is contained in:
Manuel Drehwald 2024-10-11 20:38:43 +02:00
parent 624c071b99
commit 7c37d2db98
15 changed files with 744 additions and 0 deletions

View file

@ -0,0 +1,107 @@
#![feature(prelude_import)]
#![no_std]
//@ needs-enzyme
#![feature(autodiff)]
#[prelude_import]
use ::std::prelude::rust_2015::*;
#[macro_use]
extern crate std;
//@ pretty-mode:expanded
//@ pretty-compare-only
//@ pp-exact:autodiff_forward.pp
// Test that forward mode ad macros are expanded correctly.
use std::autodiff::autodiff;
#[rustc_autodiff]
#[inline(never)]
pub fn f1(x: &[f64], y: f64) -> f64 {
// Not the most interesting derivative, but who are we to judge
// We want to be sure that the same function can be differentiated in different ways
::core::panicking::panic("not implemented")
}
#[rustc_autodiff(Forward, Dual, Const, Dual,)]
#[inline(never)]
pub fn df1(x: &[f64], bx: &[f64], y: f64) -> (f64, f64) {
unsafe { asm!("NOP", options(pure, nomem)); };
::core::hint::black_box(f1(x, y));
::core::hint::black_box((bx,));
::core::hint::black_box((f1(x, y), f64::default()))
}
#[rustc_autodiff]
#[inline(never)]
pub fn f2(x: &[f64], y: f64) -> f64 {
::core::panicking::panic("not implemented")
}
#[rustc_autodiff(Forward, Dual, Const, Const,)]
#[inline(never)]
pub fn df2(x: &[f64], bx: &[f64], y: f64) -> f64 {
unsafe { asm!("NOP", options(pure, nomem)); };
::core::hint::black_box(f2(x, y));
::core::hint::black_box((bx,));
::core::hint::black_box(f2(x, y))
}
#[rustc_autodiff]
#[inline(never)]
pub fn f3(x: &[f64], y: f64) -> f64 {
::core::panicking::panic("not implemented")
}
#[rustc_autodiff(ForwardFirst, Dual, Const, Const,)]
#[inline(never)]
pub fn df3(x: &[f64], bx: &[f64], y: f64) -> f64 {
unsafe { asm!("NOP", options(pure, nomem)); };
::core::hint::black_box(f3(x, y));
::core::hint::black_box((bx,));
::core::hint::black_box(f3(x, y))
}
#[rustc_autodiff]
#[inline(never)]
pub fn f4() {}
#[rustc_autodiff(Forward, None)]
#[inline(never)]
pub fn df4() {
unsafe { asm!("NOP", options(pure, nomem)); };
::core::hint::black_box(f4());
::core::hint::black_box(());
}
#[rustc_autodiff]
#[inline(never)]
#[rustc_autodiff]
#[inline(never)]
#[rustc_autodiff]
#[inline(never)]
pub fn f5(x: &[f64], y: f64) -> f64 {
::core::panicking::panic("not implemented")
}
#[rustc_autodiff(Forward, Const, Dual, Const,)]
#[inline(never)]
pub fn df5_y(x: &[f64], y: f64, by: f64) -> f64 {
unsafe { asm!("NOP", options(pure, nomem)); };
::core::hint::black_box(f5(x, y));
::core::hint::black_box((by,));
::core::hint::black_box(f5(x, y))
}
#[rustc_autodiff(Forward, Dual, Const, Const,)]
#[inline(never)]
pub fn df5_x(x: &[f64], bx: &[f64], y: f64) -> f64 {
unsafe { asm!("NOP", options(pure, nomem)); };
::core::hint::black_box(f5(x, y));
::core::hint::black_box((bx,));
::core::hint::black_box(f5(x, y))
}
#[rustc_autodiff(Reverse, Duplicated, Const, Active,)]
#[inline(never)]
pub fn df5_rev(x: &[f64], dx: &mut [f64], y: f64, dret: f64) -> f64 {
unsafe { asm!("NOP", options(pure, nomem)); };
::core::hint::black_box(f5(x, y));
::core::hint::black_box((dx, dret));
::core::hint::black_box(f5(x, y))
}
fn main() {}

View file

@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
//@ needs-enzyme
#![feature(autodiff)]
//@ pretty-mode:expanded
//@ pretty-compare-only
//@ pp-exact:autodiff_forward.pp
// Test that forward mode ad macros are expanded correctly.
use std::autodiff::autodiff;
#[autodiff(df1, Forward, Dual, Const, Dual)]
pub fn f1(x: &[f64], y: f64) -> f64 {
unimplemented!()
}
#[autodiff(df2, Forward, Dual, Const, Const)]
pub fn f2(x: &[f64], y: f64) -> f64 {
unimplemented!()
}
#[autodiff(df3, ForwardFirst, Dual, Const, Const)]
pub fn f3(x: &[f64], y: f64) -> f64 {
unimplemented!()
}
// Not the most interesting derivative, but who are we to judge
#[autodiff(df4, Forward)]
pub fn f4() {}
// We want to be sure that the same function can be differentiated in different ways
#[autodiff(df5_rev, Reverse, Duplicated, Const, Active)]
#[autodiff(df5_x, Forward, Dual, Const, Const)]
#[autodiff(df5_y, Forward, Const, Dual, Const)]
pub fn f5(x: &[f64], y: f64) -> f64 {
unimplemented!()
}
fn main() {}

View file

@ -0,0 +1,86 @@
#![feature(prelude_import)]
#![no_std]
//@ needs-enzyme
#![feature(autodiff)]
#[prelude_import]
use ::std::prelude::rust_2015::*;
#[macro_use]
extern crate std;
//@ pretty-mode:expanded
//@ pretty-compare-only
//@ pp-exact:autodiff_reverse.pp
// Test that reverse mode ad macros are expanded correctly.
use std::autodiff::autodiff;
#[rustc_autodiff]
#[inline(never)]
pub fn f1(x: &[f64], y: f64) -> f64 {
// Not the most interesting derivative, but who are we to judge
// What happens if we already have Reverse in type (enum variant decl) and value (enum variant
// constructor) namespace? > It's expected to work normally.
::core::panicking::panic("not implemented")
}
#[rustc_autodiff(Reverse, Duplicated, Const, Active,)]
#[inline(never)]
pub fn df1(x: &[f64], dx: &mut [f64], y: f64, dret: f64) -> f64 {
unsafe { asm!("NOP", options(pure, nomem)); };
::core::hint::black_box(f1(x, y));
::core::hint::black_box((dx, dret));
::core::hint::black_box(f1(x, y))
}
#[rustc_autodiff]
#[inline(never)]
pub fn f2() {}
#[rustc_autodiff(Reverse, None)]
#[inline(never)]
pub fn df2() {
unsafe { asm!("NOP", options(pure, nomem)); };
::core::hint::black_box(f2());
::core::hint::black_box(());
}
#[rustc_autodiff]
#[inline(never)]
pub fn f3(x: &[f64], y: f64) -> f64 {
::core::panicking::panic("not implemented")
}
#[rustc_autodiff(ReverseFirst, Duplicated, Const, Active,)]
#[inline(never)]
pub fn df3(x: &[f64], dx: &mut [f64], y: f64, dret: f64) -> f64 {
unsafe { asm!("NOP", options(pure, nomem)); };
::core::hint::black_box(f3(x, y));
::core::hint::black_box((dx, dret));
::core::hint::black_box(f3(x, y))
}
enum Foo { Reverse, }
use Foo::Reverse;
#[rustc_autodiff]
#[inline(never)]
pub fn f4(x: f32) { ::core::panicking::panic("not implemented") }
#[rustc_autodiff(Reverse, Const, None)]
#[inline(never)]
pub fn df4(x: f32) {
unsafe { asm!("NOP", options(pure, nomem)); };
::core::hint::black_box(f4(x));
::core::hint::black_box(());
}
#[rustc_autodiff]
#[inline(never)]
pub fn f5(x: *const f32, y: &f32) {
::core::panicking::panic("not implemented")
}
#[rustc_autodiff(Reverse, DuplicatedOnly, Duplicated, None)]
#[inline(never)]
pub unsafe fn df5(x: *const f32, dx: *mut f32, y: &f32, dy: &mut f32) {
unsafe { asm!("NOP", options(pure, nomem)); };
::core::hint::black_box(f5(x, y));
::core::hint::black_box((dx, dy));
}
fn main() {}

View file

@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
//@ needs-enzyme
#![feature(autodiff)]
//@ pretty-mode:expanded
//@ pretty-compare-only
//@ pp-exact:autodiff_reverse.pp
// Test that reverse mode ad macros are expanded correctly.
use std::autodiff::autodiff;
#[autodiff(df1, Reverse, Duplicated, Const, Active)]
pub fn f1(x: &[f64], y: f64) -> f64 {
unimplemented!()
}
// Not the most interesting derivative, but who are we to judge
#[autodiff(df2, Reverse)]
pub fn f2() {}
#[autodiff(df3, ReverseFirst, Duplicated, Const, Active)]
pub fn f3(x: &[f64], y: f64) -> f64 {
unimplemented!()
}
enum Foo { Reverse }
use Foo::Reverse;
// What happens if we already have Reverse in type (enum variant decl) and value (enum variant
// constructor) namespace? > It's expected to work normally.
#[autodiff(df4, Reverse, Const)]
pub fn f4(x: f32) {
unimplemented!()
}
#[autodiff(df5, Reverse, DuplicatedOnly, Duplicated)]
pub fn f5(x: *const f32, y: &f32) {
unimplemented!()
}
fn main() {}