Stop using specialization for this

Uses `__`-named `doc(hidden)` methods instead.
This commit is contained in:
Scott McMurray 2025-03-23 15:27:31 -07:00
parent 35248c6830
commit 7781346243
4 changed files with 95 additions and 84 deletions

View file

@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ mod bytewise;
pub(crate) use bytewise::BytewiseEq;
use self::Ordering::*;
use crate::ops::ControlFlow::{self, Break, Continue};
use crate::ops::ControlFlow;
/// Trait for comparisons using the equality operator.
///
@ -1436,6 +1436,67 @@ pub trait PartialOrd<Rhs: ?Sized = Self>: PartialEq<Rhs> {
fn ge(&self, other: &Rhs) -> bool {
self.partial_cmp(other).is_some_and(Ordering::is_ge)
}
/// If `self == other`, returns `ControlFlow::Continue(())`.
/// Otherwise, returns `ControlFlow::Break(self < other)`.
///
/// This is useful for chaining together calls when implementing a lexical
/// `PartialOrd::lt`, as it allows types (like primitives) which can cheaply
/// check `==` and `<` separately to do rather than needing to calculate
/// (then optimize out) the three-way `Ordering` result.
#[inline]
#[must_use]
// Added to improve the behaviour of tuples; not necessarily stabilization-track.
#[unstable(feature = "partial_ord_chaining_methods", issue = "none")]
#[doc(hidden)]
fn __chaining_lt(&self, other: &Rhs) -> ControlFlow<bool> {
default_chaining_impl(self, other, Ordering::is_lt)
}
/// Same as `__chaining_lt`, but for `<=` instead of `<`.
#[inline]
#[must_use]
#[unstable(feature = "partial_ord_chaining_methods", issue = "none")]
#[doc(hidden)]
fn __chaining_le(&self, other: &Rhs) -> ControlFlow<bool> {
default_chaining_impl(self, other, Ordering::is_le)
}
/// Same as `__chaining_lt`, but for `>` instead of `<`.
#[inline]
#[must_use]
#[unstable(feature = "partial_ord_chaining_methods", issue = "none")]
#[doc(hidden)]
fn __chaining_gt(&self, other: &Rhs) -> ControlFlow<bool> {
default_chaining_impl(self, other, Ordering::is_gt)
}
/// Same as `__chaining_lt`, but for `>=` instead of `<`.
#[inline]
#[must_use]
#[unstable(feature = "partial_ord_chaining_methods", issue = "none")]
#[doc(hidden)]
fn __chaining_ge(&self, other: &Rhs) -> ControlFlow<bool> {
default_chaining_impl(self, other, Ordering::is_ge)
}
}
fn default_chaining_impl<T: ?Sized, U: ?Sized>(
lhs: &T,
rhs: &U,
p: impl FnOnce(Ordering) -> bool,
) -> ControlFlow<bool>
where
T: PartialOrd<U>,
{
// It's important that this only call `partial_cmp` once, not call `eq` then
// one of the relational operators. We don't want to `bcmp`-then-`memcp` a
// `String`, for example, or similarly for other data structures (#108157).
match <T as PartialOrd<U>>::partial_cmp(lhs, rhs) {
Some(Equal) => ControlFlow::Continue(()),
Some(c) => ControlFlow::Break(p(c)),
None => ControlFlow::Break(false),
}
}
/// Derive macro generating an impl of the trait [`PartialOrd`].
@ -1447,54 +1508,6 @@ pub macro PartialOrd($item:item) {
/* compiler built-in */
}
/// Helpers for chaining together field PartialOrds into the full type's ordering.
///
/// If the two values are equal, returns `ControlFlow::Continue`.
/// If the two values are not equal, returns `ControlFlow::Break(self OP other)`.
///
/// This allows simple types like `i32` and `f64` to just emit two comparisons
/// directly, instead of needing to optimize the 3-way comparison.
///
/// Currently this is done using specialization, but it doesn't need that:
/// it could be provided methods on `PartialOrd` instead and work fine.
pub(crate) trait SpecChainingPartialOrd<Rhs>: PartialOrd<Rhs> {
fn spec_chain_lt(&self, other: &Rhs) -> ControlFlow<bool>;
fn spec_chain_le(&self, other: &Rhs) -> ControlFlow<bool>;
fn spec_chain_gt(&self, other: &Rhs) -> ControlFlow<bool>;
fn spec_chain_ge(&self, other: &Rhs) -> ControlFlow<bool>;
}
impl<T: PartialOrd<U>, U> SpecChainingPartialOrd<U> for T {
#[inline]
default fn spec_chain_lt(&self, other: &U) -> ControlFlow<bool> {
match PartialOrd::partial_cmp(self, other) {
Some(Equal) => Continue(()),
c => Break(c.is_some_and(Ordering::is_lt)),
}
}
#[inline]
default fn spec_chain_le(&self, other: &U) -> ControlFlow<bool> {
match PartialOrd::partial_cmp(self, other) {
Some(Equal) => Continue(()),
c => Break(c.is_some_and(Ordering::is_le)),
}
}
#[inline]
default fn spec_chain_gt(&self, other: &U) -> ControlFlow<bool> {
match PartialOrd::partial_cmp(self, other) {
Some(Equal) => Continue(()),
c => Break(c.is_some_and(Ordering::is_gt)),
}
}
#[inline]
default fn spec_chain_ge(&self, other: &U) -> ControlFlow<bool> {
match PartialOrd::partial_cmp(self, other) {
Some(Equal) => Continue(()),
c => Break(c.is_some_and(Ordering::is_ge)),
}
}
}
/// Compares and returns the minimum of two values.
///
/// Returns the first argument if the comparison determines them to be equal.
@ -1829,33 +1842,32 @@ mod impls {
eq_impl! { () bool char usize u8 u16 u32 u64 u128 isize i8 i16 i32 i64 i128 }
macro_rules! chaining_impl {
macro_rules! chaining_methods_impl {
($t:ty) => {
// These implementations are the same for `Ord` or `PartialOrd` types
// because if either is NAN the `==` test will fail so we end up in
// the `Break` case and the comparison will correctly return `false`.
impl super::SpecChainingPartialOrd<$t> for $t {
#[inline]
fn spec_chain_lt(&self, other: &Self) -> ControlFlow<bool> {
fn __chaining_lt(&self, other: &Self) -> ControlFlow<bool> {
let (lhs, rhs) = (*self, *other);
if lhs == rhs { Continue(()) } else { Break(lhs < rhs) }
}
#[inline]
fn spec_chain_le(&self, other: &Self) -> ControlFlow<bool> {
fn __chaining_le(&self, other: &Self) -> ControlFlow<bool> {
let (lhs, rhs) = (*self, *other);
if lhs == rhs { Continue(()) } else { Break(lhs <= rhs) }
}
#[inline]
fn spec_chain_gt(&self, other: &Self) -> ControlFlow<bool> {
fn __chaining_gt(&self, other: &Self) -> ControlFlow<bool> {
let (lhs, rhs) = (*self, *other);
if lhs == rhs { Continue(()) } else { Break(lhs > rhs) }
}
#[inline]
fn spec_chain_ge(&self, other: &Self) -> ControlFlow<bool> {
fn __chaining_ge(&self, other: &Self) -> ControlFlow<bool> {
let (lhs, rhs) = (*self, *other);
if lhs == rhs { Continue(()) } else { Break(lhs >= rhs) }
}
}
};
}
@ -1880,9 +1892,9 @@ mod impls {
fn ge(&self, other: &$t) -> bool { (*self) >= (*other) }
#[inline(always)]
fn gt(&self, other: &$t) -> bool { (*self) > (*other) }
}
chaining_impl!($t);
chaining_methods_impl!($t);
}
)*)
}
@ -1920,9 +1932,9 @@ mod impls {
fn ge(&self, other: &$t) -> bool { (*self) >= (*other) }
#[inline(always)]
fn gt(&self, other: &$t) -> bool { (*self) > (*other) }
}
chaining_impl!($t);
chaining_methods_impl!($t);
}
#[stable(feature = "rust1", since = "1.0.0")]
impl Ord for $t {

View file

@ -1,7 +1,6 @@
// See core/src/primitive_docs.rs for documentation.
use crate::cmp::Ordering::{self, *};
use crate::cmp::SpecChainingPartialOrd;
use crate::marker::{ConstParamTy_, StructuralPartialEq, UnsizedConstParamTy};
use crate::ops::ControlFlow::{Break, Continue};
@ -82,19 +81,19 @@ macro_rules! tuple_impls {
}
#[inline]
fn lt(&self, other: &($($T,)+)) -> bool {
lexical_ord!(lt, spec_chain_lt, $( ${ignore($T)} self.${index()}, other.${index()} ),+)
lexical_ord!(lt, __chaining_lt, $( ${ignore($T)} self.${index()}, other.${index()} ),+)
}
#[inline]
fn le(&self, other: &($($T,)+)) -> bool {
lexical_ord!(le, spec_chain_le, $( ${ignore($T)} self.${index()}, other.${index()} ),+)
lexical_ord!(le, __chaining_le, $( ${ignore($T)} self.${index()}, other.${index()} ),+)
}
#[inline]
fn ge(&self, other: &($($T,)+)) -> bool {
lexical_ord!(ge, spec_chain_ge, $( ${ignore($T)} self.${index()}, other.${index()} ),+)
lexical_ord!(ge, __chaining_ge, $( ${ignore($T)} self.${index()}, other.${index()} ),+)
}
#[inline]
fn gt(&self, other: &($($T,)+)) -> bool {
lexical_ord!(gt, spec_chain_gt, $( ${ignore($T)} self.${index()}, other.${index()} ),+)
lexical_ord!(gt, __chaining_gt, $( ${ignore($T)} self.${index()}, other.${index()} ),+)
}
}
}
@ -173,11 +172,11 @@ macro_rules! maybe_tuple_doc {
// `(a1, a2, a3) < (b1, b2, b3)` would be `lexical_ord!(lt, opt_is_lt, a1, b1,
// a2, b2, a3, b3)` (and similarly for `lexical_cmp`)
//
// `$chain_rel` is the method from `SpecChainingPartialOrd` to use for all but the
// `$chain_rel` is the chaining method from `PartialOrd` to use for all but the
// final value, to produce better results for simple primitives.
macro_rules! lexical_ord {
($rel: ident, $chain_rel: ident, $a:expr, $b:expr, $($rest_a:expr, $rest_b:expr),+) => {{
match SpecChainingPartialOrd::$chain_rel(&$a, &$b) {
match PartialOrd::$chain_rel(&$a, &$b) {
Break(val) => val,
Continue(()) => lexical_ord!($rel, $chain_rel, $($rest_a, $rest_b),+),
}

View file

@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ fn demo_ge_partial(_1: &(f32, f32), _2: &(f32, f32)) -> bool {
let _8: bool;
scope 3 {
}
scope 4 (inlined std::cmp::impls::<impl std::cmp::SpecChainingPartialOrd<f32> for f32>::spec_chain_ge) {
scope 4 (inlined std::cmp::impls::<impl PartialOrd for f32>::__chaining_ge) {
let mut _3: f32;
let mut _4: f32;
let mut _5: bool;

View file

@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ fn demo_le_total(_1: &(u16, i16), _2: &(u16, i16)) -> bool {
let _8: bool;
scope 3 {
}
scope 4 (inlined std::cmp::impls::<impl std::cmp::SpecChainingPartialOrd<u16> for u16>::spec_chain_le) {
scope 4 (inlined std::cmp::impls::<impl PartialOrd for u16>::__chaining_le) {
let mut _3: u16;
let mut _4: u16;
let mut _5: bool;