coverage: Track whether a node's count is the sum of its out-edges
This commit is contained in:
parent
6251d16e4c
commit
771659d264
2 changed files with 57 additions and 13 deletions
|
@ -316,6 +316,11 @@ impl<'a> MakeBcbCounters<'a> {
|
|||
|
||||
let successors = self.basic_coverage_blocks.successors[from_bcb].as_slice();
|
||||
|
||||
// If this node's out-edges won't sum to the node's counter,
|
||||
// then there's no reason to create edge counters here.
|
||||
if !self.basic_coverage_blocks[from_bcb].is_out_summable {
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
// If this node doesn't have multiple out-edges, or all of its out-edges
|
||||
// already have counters, then we don't need to create edge counters.
|
||||
let needs_out_edge_counters = successors.len() > 1
|
||||
|
@ -416,9 +421,10 @@ impl<'a> MakeBcbCounters<'a> {
|
|||
return self.get_or_make_node_counter(to_bcb);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// If the source BCB has only one successor (assumed to be the given target), an edge
|
||||
// counter is unnecessary. Just get or make a counter for the source BCB.
|
||||
if self.bcb_successors(from_bcb).len() == 1 {
|
||||
// If the source node has exactly one out-edge (i.e. this one) and would have
|
||||
// the same execution count as that edge, then just use the node's counter.
|
||||
if let Some(simple_succ) = self.basic_coverage_blocks.simple_successor(from_bcb) {
|
||||
assert_eq!(simple_succ, to_bcb);
|
||||
return self.get_or_make_node_counter(from_bcb);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -87,7 +87,11 @@ impl CoverageGraph {
|
|||
for &bb in basic_blocks.iter() {
|
||||
bb_to_bcb[bb] = Some(bcb);
|
||||
}
|
||||
let bcb_data = BasicCoverageBlockData::from(basic_blocks);
|
||||
|
||||
let is_out_summable = basic_blocks.last().map_or(false, |&bb| {
|
||||
bcb_filtered_successors(mir_body[bb].terminator()).is_out_summable()
|
||||
});
|
||||
let bcb_data = BasicCoverageBlockData { basic_blocks, is_out_summable };
|
||||
debug!("adding bcb{}: {:?}", bcb.index(), bcb_data);
|
||||
bcbs.push(bcb_data);
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
@ -168,8 +172,6 @@ impl CoverageGraph {
|
|||
/// edges, because if a node _doesn't_ have multiple in-edges, then there's
|
||||
/// no benefit in having a separate counter for its in-edge, because it
|
||||
/// would have the same value as the node's own counter.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// FIXME: That assumption might not be true for [`TerminatorKind::Yield`]?
|
||||
#[inline(always)]
|
||||
pub(crate) fn bcb_has_multiple_in_edges(&self, bcb: BasicCoverageBlock) -> bool {
|
||||
// Even though bcb0 conceptually has an extra virtual in-edge due to
|
||||
|
@ -179,6 +181,24 @@ impl CoverageGraph {
|
|||
// can't have a separate counter anyway.)
|
||||
self.predecessors[bcb].len() > 1
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Returns the target of this node's sole out-edge, if it has exactly
|
||||
/// one, but only if that edge can be assumed to have the same execution
|
||||
/// count as the node itself (in the absence of panics).
|
||||
pub(crate) fn simple_successor(
|
||||
&self,
|
||||
from_bcb: BasicCoverageBlock,
|
||||
) -> Option<BasicCoverageBlock> {
|
||||
// If a node's count is the sum of its out-edges, and it has exactly
|
||||
// one out-edge, then that edge has the same count as the node.
|
||||
if self.bcbs[from_bcb].is_out_summable
|
||||
&& let &[to_bcb] = self.successors[from_bcb].as_slice()
|
||||
{
|
||||
Some(to_bcb)
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
None
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl Index<BasicCoverageBlock> for CoverageGraph {
|
||||
|
@ -266,14 +286,16 @@ rustc_index::newtype_index! {
|
|||
#[derive(Debug, Clone)]
|
||||
pub(crate) struct BasicCoverageBlockData {
|
||||
pub(crate) basic_blocks: Vec<BasicBlock>,
|
||||
|
||||
/// If true, this node's execution count can be assumed to be the sum of the
|
||||
/// execution counts of all of its **out-edges** (assuming no panics).
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Notably, this is false for a node ending with [`TerminatorKind::Yield`],
|
||||
/// because the yielding coroutine might not be resumed.
|
||||
pub(crate) is_out_summable: bool,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl BasicCoverageBlockData {
|
||||
fn from(basic_blocks: Vec<BasicBlock>) -> Self {
|
||||
assert!(basic_blocks.len() > 0);
|
||||
Self { basic_blocks }
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[inline(always)]
|
||||
pub(crate) fn leader_bb(&self) -> BasicBlock {
|
||||
self.basic_blocks[0]
|
||||
|
@ -295,6 +317,9 @@ enum CoverageSuccessors<'a> {
|
|||
Chainable(BasicBlock),
|
||||
/// The block cannot be combined into the same BCB as its successor(s).
|
||||
NotChainable(&'a [BasicBlock]),
|
||||
/// Yield terminators are not chainable, and their execution count can also
|
||||
/// differ from the execution count of their out-edge.
|
||||
Yield(BasicBlock),
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl CoverageSuccessors<'_> {
|
||||
|
@ -302,6 +327,17 @@ impl CoverageSuccessors<'_> {
|
|||
match self {
|
||||
Self::Chainable(_) => true,
|
||||
Self::NotChainable(_) => false,
|
||||
Self::Yield(_) => false,
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Returns true if the terminator itself is assumed to have the same
|
||||
/// execution count as the sum of its out-edges (assuming no panics).
|
||||
fn is_out_summable(&self) -> bool {
|
||||
match self {
|
||||
Self::Chainable(_) => true,
|
||||
Self::NotChainable(_) => true,
|
||||
Self::Yield(_) => false,
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -312,7 +348,9 @@ impl IntoIterator for CoverageSuccessors<'_> {
|
|||
|
||||
fn into_iter(self) -> Self::IntoIter {
|
||||
match self {
|
||||
Self::Chainable(bb) => Some(bb).into_iter().chain((&[]).iter().copied()),
|
||||
Self::Chainable(bb) | Self::Yield(bb) => {
|
||||
Some(bb).into_iter().chain((&[]).iter().copied())
|
||||
}
|
||||
Self::NotChainable(bbs) => None.into_iter().chain(bbs.iter().copied()),
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -331,7 +369,7 @@ fn bcb_filtered_successors<'a, 'tcx>(terminator: &'a Terminator<'tcx>) -> Covera
|
|||
|
||||
// A yield terminator has exactly 1 successor, but should not be chained,
|
||||
// because its resume edge has a different execution count.
|
||||
Yield { ref resume, .. } => CoverageSuccessors::NotChainable(std::slice::from_ref(resume)),
|
||||
Yield { resume, .. } => CoverageSuccessors::Yield(resume),
|
||||
|
||||
// These terminators have exactly one coverage-relevant successor,
|
||||
// and can be chained into it.
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue